Cargando…

The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality

BACKGROUND: Improving maternal health, reducing global maternal mortality, and working toward universal access to reproductive health care are global priorities for United Nations agencies, national governments, and civil society organizations. Human rights lawyers have joined this global movement,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunn, Jennifer Templeton, Lesyna, Katherine, Zaret, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29143674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1496-0
_version_ 1783279177530605568
author Dunn, Jennifer Templeton
Lesyna, Katherine
Zaret, Anna
author_facet Dunn, Jennifer Templeton
Lesyna, Katherine
Zaret, Anna
author_sort Dunn, Jennifer Templeton
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving maternal health, reducing global maternal mortality, and working toward universal access to reproductive health care are global priorities for United Nations agencies, national governments, and civil society organizations. Human rights lawyers have joined this global movement, using international law and domestic constitutions to hold nations accountable for preventable maternal death and for failing to provide access to reproductive health care services. CASE PRESENTATION: This article discusses three decisions in which international treaty bodies find the nations of Brazil and Peru responsible for violations of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and also two domestic decisions alleging constitutional violations in India and Uganda. CONCLUSIONS: The authors analyze the impact of these decisions on access to maternal and other reproductive health services in Brazil, Peru, India, and Uganda and conclude that litigation is most effective when aligned with ongoing efforts by the public health community and civil society organizations. In filing these complaints and cases on behalf of individual women and their families, legal advocates highlight health system failures and challenge the historical structures and hierarchies that discriminate against and devalue women. These international and domestic decisions empower women and their communities and inspire nations and other stakeholders to commit to broader social, economic, and political change. Human rights litigation brings attention to existing public health campaigns and supports the development of local and global movements and coalitions to improve women’s health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article doi: (10.1186/s12884-017-1496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56884912017-11-22 The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality Dunn, Jennifer Templeton Lesyna, Katherine Zaret, Anna BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Case Report BACKGROUND: Improving maternal health, reducing global maternal mortality, and working toward universal access to reproductive health care are global priorities for United Nations agencies, national governments, and civil society organizations. Human rights lawyers have joined this global movement, using international law and domestic constitutions to hold nations accountable for preventable maternal death and for failing to provide access to reproductive health care services. CASE PRESENTATION: This article discusses three decisions in which international treaty bodies find the nations of Brazil and Peru responsible for violations of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and also two domestic decisions alleging constitutional violations in India and Uganda. CONCLUSIONS: The authors analyze the impact of these decisions on access to maternal and other reproductive health services in Brazil, Peru, India, and Uganda and conclude that litigation is most effective when aligned with ongoing efforts by the public health community and civil society organizations. In filing these complaints and cases on behalf of individual women and their families, legal advocates highlight health system failures and challenge the historical structures and hierarchies that discriminate against and devalue women. These international and domestic decisions empower women and their communities and inspire nations and other stakeholders to commit to broader social, economic, and political change. Human rights litigation brings attention to existing public health campaigns and supports the development of local and global movements and coalitions to improve women’s health. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article doi: (10.1186/s12884-017-1496-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5688491/ /pubmed/29143674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1496-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Dunn, Jennifer Templeton
Lesyna, Katherine
Zaret, Anna
The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
title The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
title_full The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
title_fullStr The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
title_full_unstemmed The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
title_short The role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
title_sort role of human rights litigation in improving access to reproductive health care and achieving reductions in maternal mortality
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29143674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1496-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dunnjennifertempleton theroleofhumanrightslitigationinimprovingaccesstoreproductivehealthcareandachievingreductionsinmaternalmortality
AT lesynakatherine theroleofhumanrightslitigationinimprovingaccesstoreproductivehealthcareandachievingreductionsinmaternalmortality
AT zaretanna theroleofhumanrightslitigationinimprovingaccesstoreproductivehealthcareandachievingreductionsinmaternalmortality
AT dunnjennifertempleton roleofhumanrightslitigationinimprovingaccesstoreproductivehealthcareandachievingreductionsinmaternalmortality
AT lesynakatherine roleofhumanrightslitigationinimprovingaccesstoreproductivehealthcareandachievingreductionsinmaternalmortality
AT zaretanna roleofhumanrightslitigationinimprovingaccesstoreproductivehealthcareandachievingreductionsinmaternalmortality