Cargando…

Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities affecting mobility. It leads to pain and disability if untreated. The Ponseti method is widely used for the correction of clubfoot. There is variation in how the result of clubfoot management is measured and reported. This review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smythe, Tracey, Mudariki, Debra, Kuper, Hannah, Lavy, Christopher, Foster, Allen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8
_version_ 1783279213019660288
author Smythe, Tracey
Mudariki, Debra
Kuper, Hannah
Lavy, Christopher
Foster, Allen
author_facet Smythe, Tracey
Mudariki, Debra
Kuper, Hannah
Lavy, Christopher
Foster, Allen
author_sort Smythe, Tracey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities affecting mobility. It leads to pain and disability if untreated. The Ponseti method is widely used for the correction of clubfoot. There is variation in how the result of clubfoot management is measured and reported. This review aims to determine and evaluate how success with the Ponseti method is reported in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Five databases were examined in August 2017 for studies that met the inclusion criteria of: (1) evaluation of the effect of clubfoot management; (2) use of the Ponseti method; (3) original study undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa; (4) published between 2000 and 2017. We used the PRISMA statement to report the scope of studies. The included studies were categorised according to a hierarchy of study methodologies and a 27-item quality measure identified methodological strengths and weaknesses. The definition of success was based on the primary outcome reported. RESULTS: Seventy-seven articles were identified by the search. Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 (64%) reported a primary outcome. Outcomes were predominantly reported though case series and the quality of evidence was low. Clinical assessment was the most commonly reported outcome measure and few studies reported long-term outcome. The literature available to assess success of clubfoot management is characterised by a lack of standardisation of outcomes, with different measures reporting success in 68% to 98% of cases. CONCLUSION: We found variation in the criteria used to define success resulting in a wide range of results. There is need for an agreed definition of good outcome (successful management) following both the correction and the bracing phases of the Ponseti method to establish standards to monitor and evaluate service delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56886742017-11-22 Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review Smythe, Tracey Mudariki, Debra Kuper, Hannah Lavy, Christopher Foster, Allen BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Clubfoot is one of the most common congenital deformities affecting mobility. It leads to pain and disability if untreated. The Ponseti method is widely used for the correction of clubfoot. There is variation in how the result of clubfoot management is measured and reported. This review aims to determine and evaluate how success with the Ponseti method is reported in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Five databases were examined in August 2017 for studies that met the inclusion criteria of: (1) evaluation of the effect of clubfoot management; (2) use of the Ponseti method; (3) original study undertaken in sub-Saharan Africa; (4) published between 2000 and 2017. We used the PRISMA statement to report the scope of studies. The included studies were categorised according to a hierarchy of study methodologies and a 27-item quality measure identified methodological strengths and weaknesses. The definition of success was based on the primary outcome reported. RESULTS: Seventy-seven articles were identified by the search. Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 14 (64%) reported a primary outcome. Outcomes were predominantly reported though case series and the quality of evidence was low. Clinical assessment was the most commonly reported outcome measure and few studies reported long-term outcome. The literature available to assess success of clubfoot management is characterised by a lack of standardisation of outcomes, with different measures reporting success in 68% to 98% of cases. CONCLUSION: We found variation in the criteria used to define success resulting in a wide range of results. There is need for an agreed definition of good outcome (successful management) following both the correction and the bracing phases of the Ponseti method to establish standards to monitor and evaluate service delivery. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688674/ /pubmed/29141609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smythe, Tracey
Mudariki, Debra
Kuper, Hannah
Lavy, Christopher
Foster, Allen
Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_full Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_short Assessment of success of the Ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review
title_sort assessment of success of the ponseti method of clubfoot management in sub-saharan africa: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1814-8
work_keys_str_mv AT smythetracey assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT mudarikidebra assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT kuperhannah assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT lavychristopher assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview
AT fosterallen assessmentofsuccessoftheponsetimethodofclubfootmanagementinsubsaharanafricaasystematicreview