Cargando…
In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely
The routine use of adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (AWBRT) after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery is now discouraged by a number of international expert panels. Three decades of randomised studies have shown that, although AWBRT improves radiological measures of intracranial disease control, t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3672-z |
_version_ | 1783279221256224768 |
---|---|
author | Pinkham, Mark B. Sahgal, Arjun Pullar, Andrew P. Foote, Matthew C. |
author_facet | Pinkham, Mark B. Sahgal, Arjun Pullar, Andrew P. Foote, Matthew C. |
author_sort | Pinkham, Mark B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The routine use of adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (AWBRT) after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery is now discouraged by a number of international expert panels. Three decades of randomised studies have shown that, although AWBRT improves radiological measures of intracranial disease control, the clinical benefit is unclear and it is also associated with inferior quality of life and neurocognitive function. The number of patients with melanoma in these trials was low, but data suggesting that treatment-related side effects should vary according to histology of the primary malignancy are lacking. For metastatic melanoma, the role of AWBRT to control microscopic disease in the brain is also a less relevant concern because systemic therapies with intracranial activity are now available. Whether AWBRT is useful in select patients deemed at high risk of neurologic death remains undefined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5688708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56887082017-11-24 In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely Pinkham, Mark B. Sahgal, Arjun Pullar, Andrew P. Foote, Matthew C. BMC Cancer Correspondence The routine use of adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy (AWBRT) after surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery is now discouraged by a number of international expert panels. Three decades of randomised studies have shown that, although AWBRT improves radiological measures of intracranial disease control, the clinical benefit is unclear and it is also associated with inferior quality of life and neurocognitive function. The number of patients with melanoma in these trials was low, but data suggesting that treatment-related side effects should vary according to histology of the primary malignancy are lacking. For metastatic melanoma, the role of AWBRT to control microscopic disease in the brain is also a less relevant concern because systemic therapies with intracranial activity are now available. Whether AWBRT is useful in select patients deemed at high risk of neurologic death remains undefined. BioMed Central 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688708/ /pubmed/29141597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3672-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Pinkham, Mark B. Sahgal, Arjun Pullar, Andrew P. Foote, Matthew C. In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
title | In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
title_full | In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
title_fullStr | In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
title_full_unstemmed | In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
title_short | In response to Fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
title_sort | in response to fogarty et al. and why adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy is not recommended routinely |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3672-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinkhammarkb inresponsetofogartyetalandwhyadjuvantwholebrainradiotherapyisnotrecommendedroutinely AT sahgalarjun inresponsetofogartyetalandwhyadjuvantwholebrainradiotherapyisnotrecommendedroutinely AT pullarandrewp inresponsetofogartyetalandwhyadjuvantwholebrainradiotherapyisnotrecommendedroutinely AT footematthewc inresponsetofogartyetalandwhyadjuvantwholebrainradiotherapyisnotrecommendedroutinely |