Cargando…

Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis testing is offered to youth in Sweden, through a network of Youth Health Clinics, free at the point of care, in an attempt to bring down the prevalence and incidence of the infection. Nevertheless, infections rates have continued to rise during the past two decades...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Anna, De Costa, Ayesha, Danielsson, Kristina Gemzell, Salazar, Mariano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2681-6
_version_ 1783279224574967808
author Nielsen, Anna
De Costa, Ayesha
Danielsson, Kristina Gemzell
Salazar, Mariano
author_facet Nielsen, Anna
De Costa, Ayesha
Danielsson, Kristina Gemzell
Salazar, Mariano
author_sort Nielsen, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis testing is offered to youth in Sweden, through a network of Youth Health Clinics, free at the point of care, in an attempt to bring down the prevalence and incidence of the infection. Nevertheless, infections rates have continued to rise during the past two decades and re-testing rates among youth for Chlamydia trachomatis has been reported to be high in Stockholm County. A few literature reports suggest that testing for sexually transmitted infections and the test result itself can have an undesirable impact on the sexual behaviour for the individual, i.e. increase sexual risk-taking. METHODS: This qualitative study aimed to explore the motives for repeated testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among youth using the services of the Youth Health Clinics in Stockholm, and how testing affects their subsequent risk-taking. We interviewed 15 repeat testers aging 18–22 years. RESULTS: Our main findings were that the fear of social stigma related to infecting a peer was a major driver of the re-testing process. The repetitive testing process, the test result, and the encounter with personnel did not decrease sexual risk-taking among this group. CONCLUSIONS: While testing and treatment services are an important part of Chlamydia trachomatis prevention it must not take the focus away from primary prevention strategies. Testing should be encouraged, but not to the exclusion of risk reduction measures. The testing services must be complemented with stronger emphasis on safe sex, especially for those who attend the clinics repeatedly, otherwise the easy accessible testing services risk counteracting its own purpose. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating youth appropriate interventions to increase condom use, taking into consideration factors which youth perceive as important to drive this behaviour change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2681-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56887212017-11-24 Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm Nielsen, Anna De Costa, Ayesha Danielsson, Kristina Gemzell Salazar, Mariano BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis testing is offered to youth in Sweden, through a network of Youth Health Clinics, free at the point of care, in an attempt to bring down the prevalence and incidence of the infection. Nevertheless, infections rates have continued to rise during the past two decades and re-testing rates among youth for Chlamydia trachomatis has been reported to be high in Stockholm County. A few literature reports suggest that testing for sexually transmitted infections and the test result itself can have an undesirable impact on the sexual behaviour for the individual, i.e. increase sexual risk-taking. METHODS: This qualitative study aimed to explore the motives for repeated testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among youth using the services of the Youth Health Clinics in Stockholm, and how testing affects their subsequent risk-taking. We interviewed 15 repeat testers aging 18–22 years. RESULTS: Our main findings were that the fear of social stigma related to infecting a peer was a major driver of the re-testing process. The repetitive testing process, the test result, and the encounter with personnel did not decrease sexual risk-taking among this group. CONCLUSIONS: While testing and treatment services are an important part of Chlamydia trachomatis prevention it must not take the focus away from primary prevention strategies. Testing should be encouraged, but not to the exclusion of risk reduction measures. The testing services must be complemented with stronger emphasis on safe sex, especially for those who attend the clinics repeatedly, otherwise the easy accessible testing services risk counteracting its own purpose. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating youth appropriate interventions to increase condom use, taking into consideration factors which youth perceive as important to drive this behaviour change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2681-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688721/ /pubmed/29141635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2681-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nielsen, Anna
De Costa, Ayesha
Danielsson, Kristina Gemzell
Salazar, Mariano
Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm
title Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm
title_full Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm
title_fullStr Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm
title_full_unstemmed Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm
title_short Repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in Stockholm
title_sort repeat testing for chlamydia trachomatis, a “safe approach” to unsafe sex? a qualitative exploration among youth in stockholm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2681-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenanna repeattestingforchlamydiatrachomatisasafeapproachtounsafesexaqualitativeexplorationamongyouthinstockholm
AT decostaayesha repeattestingforchlamydiatrachomatisasafeapproachtounsafesexaqualitativeexplorationamongyouthinstockholm
AT danielssonkristinagemzell repeattestingforchlamydiatrachomatisasafeapproachtounsafesexaqualitativeexplorationamongyouthinstockholm
AT salazarmariano repeattestingforchlamydiatrachomatisasafeapproachtounsafesexaqualitativeexplorationamongyouthinstockholm