Cargando…

Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Patients with TB have diverse and often challenging clinical and social needs that may hamper successful treatment outcomes. Understanding the need for additional support during treatment (enhanced case management, or ECM) is important for workforce capacity planning. North West England...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tucker, Angela, Mithoo, Jeniffer, Cleary, Paul, Woodhead, Mark, MacPherson, Peter, Wingfield, Tom, Davies, Stefanie, Wake, Carolyn, McMaster, Paddy, Bertel Squire, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4892-5
_version_ 1783279226301972480
author Tucker, Angela
Mithoo, Jeniffer
Cleary, Paul
Woodhead, Mark
MacPherson, Peter
Wingfield, Tom
Davies, Stefanie
Wake, Carolyn
McMaster, Paddy
Bertel Squire, S.
author_facet Tucker, Angela
Mithoo, Jeniffer
Cleary, Paul
Woodhead, Mark
MacPherson, Peter
Wingfield, Tom
Davies, Stefanie
Wake, Carolyn
McMaster, Paddy
Bertel Squire, S.
author_sort Tucker, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with TB have diverse and often challenging clinical and social needs that may hamper successful treatment outcomes. Understanding the need for additional support during treatment (enhanced case management, or ECM) is important for workforce capacity planning. North West England TB Cohort Audit (TBCA) has introduced a 4-level ECM classification system (ECM 0–3) to quantify the need for ECM in the region. This study describes the data from the first 2 years of ECM classification. METHODS: Data collected between April 2013 and July 2015 were used to analyse the proportions of patients allocated to each ECM level and the prevalence of social and clinical factors indicating need for ECM. Single variable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between ECM level and treatment outcome. RESULTS: Of 1714 notified cases 99.8% were assigned an ECM level: 31% ECM1, 19% ECM2 and 14% ECM3. The most common factors indicating need for ECM were language barriers (20.3%) and clinical complexity (16.9%). 1342/1493 (89.9%) of drug-sensitive, non-CNS cases completed treatment within 12 months. Patients in ECM2 and 3 were less likely to complete treatment at 12 months than patients in ECM0 (adjusted OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27–0.84] and 0.23 [0.13–0.41] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Use of TBCA to quantify different levels of need for ECM is feasible and has demonstrated that social and clinical complexity is common in the region. Results will inform regional workforce planning and assist development of innovative methods to improve treatment outcomes in these vulnerable groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4892-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56887292017-11-24 Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study Tucker, Angela Mithoo, Jeniffer Cleary, Paul Woodhead, Mark MacPherson, Peter Wingfield, Tom Davies, Stefanie Wake, Carolyn McMaster, Paddy Bertel Squire, S. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients with TB have diverse and often challenging clinical and social needs that may hamper successful treatment outcomes. Understanding the need for additional support during treatment (enhanced case management, or ECM) is important for workforce capacity planning. North West England TB Cohort Audit (TBCA) has introduced a 4-level ECM classification system (ECM 0–3) to quantify the need for ECM in the region. This study describes the data from the first 2 years of ECM classification. METHODS: Data collected between April 2013 and July 2015 were used to analyse the proportions of patients allocated to each ECM level and the prevalence of social and clinical factors indicating need for ECM. Single variable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between ECM level and treatment outcome. RESULTS: Of 1714 notified cases 99.8% were assigned an ECM level: 31% ECM1, 19% ECM2 and 14% ECM3. The most common factors indicating need for ECM were language barriers (20.3%) and clinical complexity (16.9%). 1342/1493 (89.9%) of drug-sensitive, non-CNS cases completed treatment within 12 months. Patients in ECM2 and 3 were less likely to complete treatment at 12 months than patients in ECM0 (adjusted OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27–0.84] and 0.23 [0.13–0.41] respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Use of TBCA to quantify different levels of need for ECM is feasible and has demonstrated that social and clinical complexity is common in the region. Results will inform regional workforce planning and assist development of innovative methods to improve treatment outcomes in these vulnerable groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4892-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688729/ /pubmed/29141600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4892-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tucker, Angela
Mithoo, Jeniffer
Cleary, Paul
Woodhead, Mark
MacPherson, Peter
Wingfield, Tom
Davies, Stefanie
Wake, Carolyn
McMaster, Paddy
Bertel Squire, S.
Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study
title Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study
title_full Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study
title_fullStr Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study
title_short Quantifying the need for enhanced case management for TB patients as part of TB cohort audit in the North West of England: a descriptive study
title_sort quantifying the need for enhanced case management for tb patients as part of tb cohort audit in the north west of england: a descriptive study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4892-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tuckerangela quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT mithoojeniffer quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT clearypaul quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT woodheadmark quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT macphersonpeter quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT wingfieldtom quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT daviesstefanie quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT wakecarolyn quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT mcmasterpaddy quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy
AT bertelsquires quantifyingtheneedforenhancedcasemanagementfortbpatientsaspartoftbcohortauditinthenorthwestofenglandadescriptivestudy