Cargando…

Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence

BACKGROUND: Most countries recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) are vaccinated seasonally against influenza in order to protect themselves and patients. However, in many cases coverage remains low. A range of strategies have been implemented to increase uptake. Qualitative evidence can help in u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenc, Theo, Marshall, David, Wright, Kath, Sutcliffe, Katy, Sowden, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4
_version_ 1783279228469379072
author Lorenc, Theo
Marshall, David
Wright, Kath
Sutcliffe, Katy
Sowden, Amanda
author_facet Lorenc, Theo
Marshall, David
Wright, Kath
Sutcliffe, Katy
Sowden, Amanda
author_sort Lorenc, Theo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most countries recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) are vaccinated seasonally against influenza in order to protect themselves and patients. However, in many cases coverage remains low. A range of strategies have been implemented to increase uptake. Qualitative evidence can help in understanding the context of interventions, including why interventions may fail to achieve the desired effect. This study aimed to synthesise evidence on HCWs’ perceptions and experiences of vaccination for seasonal influenza. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and included English-language studies which reported substantive qualitative data on the vaccination of HCWs for seasonal influenza. Findings were synthesised thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the review. HCWs may be motivated to accept vaccination to protect themselves and their patients against infection. However, a range of beliefs may act as barriers to vaccine uptake, including concerns about side-effects, scepticism about vaccine effectiveness, and the belief that influenza is not a serious illness. HCWs value their autonomy and professional responsibility in making decisions about vaccination. The implementation of interventions to promote vaccination uptake may face barriers both from HCWs’ personal beliefs and from the relationships between management and employees within the targeted organisations. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs’ vaccination behaviour needs to be understood in the context of HCWs’ relationships with each other, with management and with patients. Interventions to promote vaccination should take into account both the individual beliefs of targeted HCWs and the organisational context within which they are implemented. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56887382017-11-24 Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence Lorenc, Theo Marshall, David Wright, Kath Sutcliffe, Katy Sowden, Amanda BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most countries recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) are vaccinated seasonally against influenza in order to protect themselves and patients. However, in many cases coverage remains low. A range of strategies have been implemented to increase uptake. Qualitative evidence can help in understanding the context of interventions, including why interventions may fail to achieve the desired effect. This study aimed to synthesise evidence on HCWs’ perceptions and experiences of vaccination for seasonal influenza. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and included English-language studies which reported substantive qualitative data on the vaccination of HCWs for seasonal influenza. Findings were synthesised thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the review. HCWs may be motivated to accept vaccination to protect themselves and their patients against infection. However, a range of beliefs may act as barriers to vaccine uptake, including concerns about side-effects, scepticism about vaccine effectiveness, and the belief that influenza is not a serious illness. HCWs value their autonomy and professional responsibility in making decisions about vaccination. The implementation of interventions to promote vaccination uptake may face barriers both from HCWs’ personal beliefs and from the relationships between management and employees within the targeted organisations. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs’ vaccination behaviour needs to be understood in the context of HCWs’ relationships with each other, with management and with patients. Interventions to promote vaccination should take into account both the individual beliefs of targeted HCWs and the organisational context within which they are implemented. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688738/ /pubmed/29141619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lorenc, Theo
Marshall, David
Wright, Kath
Sutcliffe, Katy
Sowden, Amanda
Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
title Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_full Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_fullStr Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_short Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_sort seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenctheo seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT marshalldavid seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT wrightkath seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT sutcliffekaty seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT sowdenamanda seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence