Cargando…
Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence
BACKGROUND: Most countries recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) are vaccinated seasonally against influenza in order to protect themselves and patients. However, in many cases coverage remains low. A range of strategies have been implemented to increase uptake. Qualitative evidence can help in u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4 |
_version_ | 1783279228469379072 |
---|---|
author | Lorenc, Theo Marshall, David Wright, Kath Sutcliffe, Katy Sowden, Amanda |
author_facet | Lorenc, Theo Marshall, David Wright, Kath Sutcliffe, Katy Sowden, Amanda |
author_sort | Lorenc, Theo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most countries recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) are vaccinated seasonally against influenza in order to protect themselves and patients. However, in many cases coverage remains low. A range of strategies have been implemented to increase uptake. Qualitative evidence can help in understanding the context of interventions, including why interventions may fail to achieve the desired effect. This study aimed to synthesise evidence on HCWs’ perceptions and experiences of vaccination for seasonal influenza. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and included English-language studies which reported substantive qualitative data on the vaccination of HCWs for seasonal influenza. Findings were synthesised thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the review. HCWs may be motivated to accept vaccination to protect themselves and their patients against infection. However, a range of beliefs may act as barriers to vaccine uptake, including concerns about side-effects, scepticism about vaccine effectiveness, and the belief that influenza is not a serious illness. HCWs value their autonomy and professional responsibility in making decisions about vaccination. The implementation of interventions to promote vaccination uptake may face barriers both from HCWs’ personal beliefs and from the relationships between management and employees within the targeted organisations. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs’ vaccination behaviour needs to be understood in the context of HCWs’ relationships with each other, with management and with patients. Interventions to promote vaccination should take into account both the individual beliefs of targeted HCWs and the organisational context within which they are implemented. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5688738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56887382017-11-24 Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence Lorenc, Theo Marshall, David Wright, Kath Sutcliffe, Katy Sowden, Amanda BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most countries recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) are vaccinated seasonally against influenza in order to protect themselves and patients. However, in many cases coverage remains low. A range of strategies have been implemented to increase uptake. Qualitative evidence can help in understanding the context of interventions, including why interventions may fail to achieve the desired effect. This study aimed to synthesise evidence on HCWs’ perceptions and experiences of vaccination for seasonal influenza. METHODS: Systematic review of qualitative evidence. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and included English-language studies which reported substantive qualitative data on the vaccination of HCWs for seasonal influenza. Findings were synthesised thematically. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included in the review. HCWs may be motivated to accept vaccination to protect themselves and their patients against infection. However, a range of beliefs may act as barriers to vaccine uptake, including concerns about side-effects, scepticism about vaccine effectiveness, and the belief that influenza is not a serious illness. HCWs value their autonomy and professional responsibility in making decisions about vaccination. The implementation of interventions to promote vaccination uptake may face barriers both from HCWs’ personal beliefs and from the relationships between management and employees within the targeted organisations. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs’ vaccination behaviour needs to be understood in the context of HCWs’ relationships with each other, with management and with patients. Interventions to promote vaccination should take into account both the individual beliefs of targeted HCWs and the organisational context within which they are implemented. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5688738/ /pubmed/29141619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lorenc, Theo Marshall, David Wright, Kath Sutcliffe, Katy Sowden, Amanda Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
title | Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
title_full | Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
title_fullStr | Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
title_short | Seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
title_sort | seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers: systematic review of qualitative evidence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29141619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2703-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenctheo seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT marshalldavid seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT wrightkath seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT sutcliffekaty seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence AT sowdenamanda seasonalinfluenzavaccinationofhealthcareworkerssystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence |