Cargando…

Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations

INTRODUCTION: Premixed insulin analogs represent an alternative to basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). “Low-mix” formulations with a low rapid-acting to long-acting analog ratio (e.g., 25/75) are commonly used, but 50/50 formulations (Mix50) may be more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deed, Gary, Kilov, Gary, Dunning, Trisha, Cutfield, Richard, Overland, Jane, Wu, Ted
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0328-6
_version_ 1783279291813855232
author Deed, Gary
Kilov, Gary
Dunning, Trisha
Cutfield, Richard
Overland, Jane
Wu, Ted
author_facet Deed, Gary
Kilov, Gary
Dunning, Trisha
Cutfield, Richard
Overland, Jane
Wu, Ted
author_sort Deed, Gary
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Premixed insulin analogs represent an alternative to basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). “Low-mix” formulations with a low rapid-acting to long-acting analog ratio (e.g., 25/75) are commonly used, but 50/50 formulations (Mix50) may be more appropriate for some patients. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the efficacy and safety of Mix50, compared with low-mix, basal, or basal–bolus therapy, for insulin initiation and intensification. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, LillyTrials.com, and NovoNordisk-trials.com were searched (11 or 13 Dec 2016) using terms for T2D, premixed insulin analogs, and/or Mix50. Studies (randomized, nonrandomized, or observational; English only) comparing Mix50 with other insulins (except human) and reporting key efficacy [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial glucose] and/or safety (hypoglycemia, weight gain) outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Narrative reviews, letters, editorials, and conference abstracts were excluded. Risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches identified 716 unique studies, of which 32 met inclusion criteria. An additional three studies were identified in the other databases. All 19 randomized trials except one were open label; risk of other biases was generally low. Although not conclusive, the evidence suggests that Mix50 may provide better glycemic control (HbA1c reduction) and, particularly, postprandial glucose reduction in certain patients, such as those with high carbohydrate diets and Asian patients, than low-mix and basal therapy. Based on this evidence and our experience, we provide clinical guidance on factors to consider when deciding whether Mix50 is appropriate for individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mix50 may be more suitable than low-mix therapy for certain patients. Clinicians should consider not only efficacy and safety but also patient characteristics and preferences when tailoring insulin treatment to individuals with T2D. FUNDING: Eli Lilly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0328-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5688993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56889932017-11-29 Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations Deed, Gary Kilov, Gary Dunning, Trisha Cutfield, Richard Overland, Jane Wu, Ted Diabetes Ther Review INTRODUCTION: Premixed insulin analogs represent an alternative to basal or basal–bolus insulin regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). “Low-mix” formulations with a low rapid-acting to long-acting analog ratio (e.g., 25/75) are commonly used, but 50/50 formulations (Mix50) may be more appropriate for some patients. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess the efficacy and safety of Mix50, compared with low-mix, basal, or basal–bolus therapy, for insulin initiation and intensification. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, LillyTrials.com, and NovoNordisk-trials.com were searched (11 or 13 Dec 2016) using terms for T2D, premixed insulin analogs, and/or Mix50. Studies (randomized, nonrandomized, or observational; English only) comparing Mix50 with other insulins (except human) and reporting key efficacy [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial glucose] and/or safety (hypoglycemia, weight gain) outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Narrative reviews, letters, editorials, and conference abstracts were excluded. Risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane tool. RESULTS: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches identified 716 unique studies, of which 32 met inclusion criteria. An additional three studies were identified in the other databases. All 19 randomized trials except one were open label; risk of other biases was generally low. Although not conclusive, the evidence suggests that Mix50 may provide better glycemic control (HbA1c reduction) and, particularly, postprandial glucose reduction in certain patients, such as those with high carbohydrate diets and Asian patients, than low-mix and basal therapy. Based on this evidence and our experience, we provide clinical guidance on factors to consider when deciding whether Mix50 is appropriate for individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mix50 may be more suitable than low-mix therapy for certain patients. Clinicians should consider not only efficacy and safety but also patient characteristics and preferences when tailoring insulin treatment to individuals with T2D. FUNDING: Eli Lilly. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0328-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2017-11-07 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5688993/ /pubmed/29116584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0328-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Deed, Gary
Kilov, Gary
Dunning, Trisha
Cutfield, Richard
Overland, Jane
Wu, Ted
Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations
title Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations
title_full Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations
title_fullStr Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations
title_short Use of 50/50 Premixed Insulin Analogs in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Clinical Recommendations
title_sort use of 50/50 premixed insulin analogs in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and clinical recommendations
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29116584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0328-6
work_keys_str_mv AT deedgary useof5050premixedinsulinanalogsintype2diabetessystematicreviewandclinicalrecommendations
AT kilovgary useof5050premixedinsulinanalogsintype2diabetessystematicreviewandclinicalrecommendations
AT dunningtrisha useof5050premixedinsulinanalogsintype2diabetessystematicreviewandclinicalrecommendations
AT cutfieldrichard useof5050premixedinsulinanalogsintype2diabetessystematicreviewandclinicalrecommendations
AT overlandjane useof5050premixedinsulinanalogsintype2diabetessystematicreviewandclinicalrecommendations
AT wuted useof5050premixedinsulinanalogsintype2diabetessystematicreviewandclinicalrecommendations