Cargando…
Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
Despite step-down inhibitory avoidance procedures that have been widely implemented in rats and mice to study learning and emotion phenomena, performance of other species in these tasks has received less attention. The case of the Mongolian gerbil is of relevance considering the discrepancies in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152417 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4009 |
_version_ | 1783279297650229248 |
---|---|
author | Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo González-León, Camilo Arias-Higuera, Mónica A. Cardona, Angelo Medina, Lucia G. García-Muñoz, Laura Sánchez, Christian Cifuentes, Julián Forigua, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Andrea Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A. Rico, Javier L. |
author_facet | Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo González-León, Camilo Arias-Higuera, Mónica A. Cardona, Angelo Medina, Lucia G. García-Muñoz, Laura Sánchez, Christian Cifuentes, Julián Forigua, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Andrea Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A. Rico, Javier L. |
author_sort | Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite step-down inhibitory avoidance procedures that have been widely implemented in rats and mice to study learning and emotion phenomena, performance of other species in these tasks has received less attention. The case of the Mongolian gerbil is of relevance considering the discrepancies in the parameters of the step-down protocols implemented, especially the wide range of foot-shock intensities (i.e., 0.4–4.0 mA), and the lack of information on long-term performance, extinction effects, and behavioral patterning during these tasks. Experiment 1 aimed to (a) characterize gerbils’ acquisition, extinction, and steady-state performance during a multisession (i.e., extended) step-down protocol adapted for implementation in a commercially-available behavioral package (Video Fear Conditioning System—MED Associates Fairfax, VT, USA), and (b) compare gerbils’ performance in this task with two shock intensities – 0.5 vs. 1.0 mA—considered in the low-to-mid range. Results indicated that the 1.0 mA protocol produced more reliable and clear evidence of avoidance learning, extinction, and reacquisition in terms of increments in freezing and on-platform time as well as suppression of platform descent. Experiment 2 aimed to (a) assess whether an alternate protocol consisting of a random delivery of foot shocks could replicate the effects of Experiment 1 and (b) characterize gerbils’ exploratory behavior during the step-down task (jumping, digging, rearing, and probing). Random shocks did not reproduce the effects observed with the first protocol. The data also indicated that a change from random to response-dependent shocks affects (a) the length of each visit to the platform, but not the frequency of platform descends or freezing time, and (b) the patterns of exploratory behavior, namely, suppression of digging and rearing, as well as increments in probing and jumping. Overall, the study demonstrated the feasibility of the extended step-down protocol for studying steady performance, extinction, and reacquisition of avoidance behavior in gerbils, which could be easily implemented in a commercially available system. The observation that 1.0 mA shocks produced a clear and consistent avoidance behavior suggests that implementation of higher intensities is unnecessary for reproducing aversive-conditioning effects in this species. The observed patterning of freezing, platform descents, and exploratory responses produced by the change from random to periodic shocks may relate to the active defensive system of the gerbil. Of special interest is the probing behavior, which could be interpreted as risk assessment and has not been reported in other rodent species exposed to step-down and similar tasks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56890202017-11-17 Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo González-León, Camilo Arias-Higuera, Mónica A. Cardona, Angelo Medina, Lucia G. García-Muñoz, Laura Sánchez, Christian Cifuentes, Julián Forigua, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Andrea Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A. Rico, Javier L. PeerJ Animal Behavior Despite step-down inhibitory avoidance procedures that have been widely implemented in rats and mice to study learning and emotion phenomena, performance of other species in these tasks has received less attention. The case of the Mongolian gerbil is of relevance considering the discrepancies in the parameters of the step-down protocols implemented, especially the wide range of foot-shock intensities (i.e., 0.4–4.0 mA), and the lack of information on long-term performance, extinction effects, and behavioral patterning during these tasks. Experiment 1 aimed to (a) characterize gerbils’ acquisition, extinction, and steady-state performance during a multisession (i.e., extended) step-down protocol adapted for implementation in a commercially-available behavioral package (Video Fear Conditioning System—MED Associates Fairfax, VT, USA), and (b) compare gerbils’ performance in this task with two shock intensities – 0.5 vs. 1.0 mA—considered in the low-to-mid range. Results indicated that the 1.0 mA protocol produced more reliable and clear evidence of avoidance learning, extinction, and reacquisition in terms of increments in freezing and on-platform time as well as suppression of platform descent. Experiment 2 aimed to (a) assess whether an alternate protocol consisting of a random delivery of foot shocks could replicate the effects of Experiment 1 and (b) characterize gerbils’ exploratory behavior during the step-down task (jumping, digging, rearing, and probing). Random shocks did not reproduce the effects observed with the first protocol. The data also indicated that a change from random to response-dependent shocks affects (a) the length of each visit to the platform, but not the frequency of platform descends or freezing time, and (b) the patterns of exploratory behavior, namely, suppression of digging and rearing, as well as increments in probing and jumping. Overall, the study demonstrated the feasibility of the extended step-down protocol for studying steady performance, extinction, and reacquisition of avoidance behavior in gerbils, which could be easily implemented in a commercially available system. The observation that 1.0 mA shocks produced a clear and consistent avoidance behavior suggests that implementation of higher intensities is unnecessary for reproducing aversive-conditioning effects in this species. The observed patterning of freezing, platform descents, and exploratory responses produced by the change from random to periodic shocks may relate to the active defensive system of the gerbil. Of special interest is the probing behavior, which could be interpreted as risk assessment and has not been reported in other rodent species exposed to step-down and similar tasks. PeerJ Inc. 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5689020/ /pubmed/29152417 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4009 Text en ©2017 Hurtado-Parrado et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo González-León, Camilo Arias-Higuera, Mónica A. Cardona, Angelo Medina, Lucia G. García-Muñoz, Laura Sánchez, Christian Cifuentes, Julián Forigua, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Andrea Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A. Rico, Javier L. Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
title | Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
title_full | Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
title_fullStr | Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
title_short | Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
title_sort | assessing mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task |
topic | Animal Behavior |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152417 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurtadoparradocamilo assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT gonzalezleoncamilo assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT ariashigueramonicaa assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT cardonaangelo assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT medinaluciag assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT garciamunozlaura assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT sanchezchristian assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT cifuentesjulian assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT foriguajuancarlos assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT ortizandrea assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT acevedotrianacesara assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask AT ricojavierl assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask |