Cargando…

Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task

Despite step-down inhibitory avoidance procedures that have been widely implemented in rats and mice to study learning and emotion phenomena, performance of other species in these tasks has received less attention. The case of the Mongolian gerbil is of relevance considering the discrepancies in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo, González-León, Camilo, Arias-Higuera, Mónica A., Cardona, Angelo, Medina, Lucia G., García-Muñoz, Laura, Sánchez, Christian, Cifuentes, Julián, Forigua, Juan Carlos, Ortiz, Andrea, Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A., Rico, Javier L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152417
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4009
_version_ 1783279297650229248
author Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo
González-León, Camilo
Arias-Higuera, Mónica A.
Cardona, Angelo
Medina, Lucia G.
García-Muñoz, Laura
Sánchez, Christian
Cifuentes, Julián
Forigua, Juan Carlos
Ortiz, Andrea
Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A.
Rico, Javier L.
author_facet Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo
González-León, Camilo
Arias-Higuera, Mónica A.
Cardona, Angelo
Medina, Lucia G.
García-Muñoz, Laura
Sánchez, Christian
Cifuentes, Julián
Forigua, Juan Carlos
Ortiz, Andrea
Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A.
Rico, Javier L.
author_sort Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo
collection PubMed
description Despite step-down inhibitory avoidance procedures that have been widely implemented in rats and mice to study learning and emotion phenomena, performance of other species in these tasks has received less attention. The case of the Mongolian gerbil is of relevance considering the discrepancies in the parameters of the step-down protocols implemented, especially the wide range of foot-shock intensities (i.e., 0.4–4.0 mA), and the lack of information on long-term performance, extinction effects, and behavioral patterning during these tasks. Experiment 1 aimed to (a) characterize gerbils’ acquisition, extinction, and steady-state performance during a multisession (i.e., extended) step-down protocol adapted for implementation in a commercially-available behavioral package (Video Fear Conditioning System—MED Associates Fairfax, VT, USA), and (b) compare gerbils’ performance in this task with two shock intensities – 0.5 vs. 1.0 mA—considered in the low-to-mid range. Results indicated that the 1.0 mA protocol produced more reliable and clear evidence of avoidance learning, extinction, and reacquisition in terms of increments in freezing and on-platform time as well as suppression of platform descent. Experiment 2 aimed to (a) assess whether an alternate protocol consisting of a random delivery of foot shocks could replicate the effects of Experiment 1 and (b) characterize gerbils’ exploratory behavior during the step-down task (jumping, digging, rearing, and probing). Random shocks did not reproduce the effects observed with the first protocol. The data also indicated that a change from random to response-dependent shocks affects (a) the length of each visit to the platform, but not the frequency of platform descends or freezing time, and (b) the patterns of exploratory behavior, namely, suppression of digging and rearing, as well as increments in probing and jumping. Overall, the study demonstrated the feasibility of the extended step-down protocol for studying steady performance, extinction, and reacquisition of avoidance behavior in gerbils, which could be easily implemented in a commercially available system. The observation that 1.0 mA shocks produced a clear and consistent avoidance behavior suggests that implementation of higher intensities is unnecessary for reproducing aversive-conditioning effects in this species. The observed patterning of freezing, platform descents, and exploratory responses produced by the change from random to periodic shocks may relate to the active defensive system of the gerbil. Of special interest is the probing behavior, which could be interpreted as risk assessment and has not been reported in other rodent species exposed to step-down and similar tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56890202017-11-17 Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo González-León, Camilo Arias-Higuera, Mónica A. Cardona, Angelo Medina, Lucia G. García-Muñoz, Laura Sánchez, Christian Cifuentes, Julián Forigua, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Andrea Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A. Rico, Javier L. PeerJ Animal Behavior Despite step-down inhibitory avoidance procedures that have been widely implemented in rats and mice to study learning and emotion phenomena, performance of other species in these tasks has received less attention. The case of the Mongolian gerbil is of relevance considering the discrepancies in the parameters of the step-down protocols implemented, especially the wide range of foot-shock intensities (i.e., 0.4–4.0 mA), and the lack of information on long-term performance, extinction effects, and behavioral patterning during these tasks. Experiment 1 aimed to (a) characterize gerbils’ acquisition, extinction, and steady-state performance during a multisession (i.e., extended) step-down protocol adapted for implementation in a commercially-available behavioral package (Video Fear Conditioning System—MED Associates Fairfax, VT, USA), and (b) compare gerbils’ performance in this task with two shock intensities – 0.5 vs. 1.0 mA—considered in the low-to-mid range. Results indicated that the 1.0 mA protocol produced more reliable and clear evidence of avoidance learning, extinction, and reacquisition in terms of increments in freezing and on-platform time as well as suppression of platform descent. Experiment 2 aimed to (a) assess whether an alternate protocol consisting of a random delivery of foot shocks could replicate the effects of Experiment 1 and (b) characterize gerbils’ exploratory behavior during the step-down task (jumping, digging, rearing, and probing). Random shocks did not reproduce the effects observed with the first protocol. The data also indicated that a change from random to response-dependent shocks affects (a) the length of each visit to the platform, but not the frequency of platform descends or freezing time, and (b) the patterns of exploratory behavior, namely, suppression of digging and rearing, as well as increments in probing and jumping. Overall, the study demonstrated the feasibility of the extended step-down protocol for studying steady performance, extinction, and reacquisition of avoidance behavior in gerbils, which could be easily implemented in a commercially available system. The observation that 1.0 mA shocks produced a clear and consistent avoidance behavior suggests that implementation of higher intensities is unnecessary for reproducing aversive-conditioning effects in this species. The observed patterning of freezing, platform descents, and exploratory responses produced by the change from random to periodic shocks may relate to the active defensive system of the gerbil. Of special interest is the probing behavior, which could be interpreted as risk assessment and has not been reported in other rodent species exposed to step-down and similar tasks. PeerJ Inc. 2017-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5689020/ /pubmed/29152417 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4009 Text en ©2017 Hurtado-Parrado et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Animal Behavior
Hurtado-Parrado, Camilo
González-León, Camilo
Arias-Higuera, Mónica A.
Cardona, Angelo
Medina, Lucia G.
García-Muñoz, Laura
Sánchez, Christian
Cifuentes, Julián
Forigua, Juan Carlos
Ortiz, Andrea
Acevedo-Triana, Cesar A.
Rico, Javier L.
Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
title Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
title_full Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
title_fullStr Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
title_short Assessing Mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
title_sort assessing mongolian gerbil emotional behavior: effects of two shock intensities and response-independent shocks during an extended inhibitory-avoidance task
topic Animal Behavior
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152417
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4009
work_keys_str_mv AT hurtadoparradocamilo assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT gonzalezleoncamilo assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT ariashigueramonicaa assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT cardonaangelo assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT medinaluciag assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT garciamunozlaura assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT sanchezchristian assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT cifuentesjulian assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT foriguajuancarlos assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT ortizandrea assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT acevedotrianacesara assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask
AT ricojavierl assessingmongoliangerbilemotionalbehavioreffectsoftwoshockintensitiesandresponseindependentshocksduringanextendedinhibitoryavoidancetask