Cargando…

Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: Treatment decision-making in older patients with colorectal (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PC) needs improvement. We introduced the EASYcare in Geriatric Onco-surgery (EASY-GO) intervention to optimize the shared decision-making (SDM) process among these patients. METHODS: The EASY-GO interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geessink, Noralie H, Schoon, Yvonne, Olde Rikkert, Marcel GM, van Goor, Harry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184443
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S147312
_version_ 1783279298615967744
author Geessink, Noralie H
Schoon, Yvonne
Olde Rikkert, Marcel GM
van Goor, Harry
author_facet Geessink, Noralie H
Schoon, Yvonne
Olde Rikkert, Marcel GM
van Goor, Harry
author_sort Geessink, Noralie H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Treatment decision-making in older patients with colorectal (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PC) needs improvement. We introduced the EASYcare in Geriatric Onco-surgery (EASY-GO) intervention to optimize the shared decision-making (SDM) process among these patients. METHODS: The EASY-GO intervention comprised a working method with geriatric assessment and SDM training for surgeons. A non-equivalent control group design was used. Newly diagnosed CRC/PC patients aged ≥65 years were included. Primary patient-reported experiences were the quality of SDM (SDM-Q-9, range 0–100), involvement in decision-making (Visual Analog Scale for Involvement in the decision-making process [range 0–10]), satisfaction about decision-making (Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction concerning the decision-making process [range 0–10]), and decisional regret (Decisional Regret Scale [DRS], range 0–100). Only for DRS, lower scores are better. RESULTS: A total of 71.4% of the involved consultants and 42.9% of the involved residents participated in the EASY-GO training. Only 4 trained surgeons consulted patients both before (n=19) and after (n=19) training and were consequently included in the analyses. All patient-reported experience measures showed a consistent but non-significant change in the direction of improved decision-making after training. According to surgeons, decisions were significantly more often made together with the patient after training (before, 38.9% vs after, 73.7%, p=0.04). Sub-analyses per diagnosis showed that patient experiences among older PC patients consistent and clinically relevant changed in the direction of improved decision-making after training (SDM-Q-9 +13.4 [95% CI −7.9; 34.6], VAS-I +0.27 [95% CI −1.1; 1.6], VAS-S +0.88 [95% CI −0.5; 2.2], DRS −10.3 [95% CI −27.8; 7.1]). CONCLUSION: This pilot study strengthens the practical potential of the intervention’s concept among older surgical cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56890242017-11-28 Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study Geessink, Noralie H Schoon, Yvonne Olde Rikkert, Marcel GM van Goor, Harry Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: Treatment decision-making in older patients with colorectal (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PC) needs improvement. We introduced the EASYcare in Geriatric Onco-surgery (EASY-GO) intervention to optimize the shared decision-making (SDM) process among these patients. METHODS: The EASY-GO intervention comprised a working method with geriatric assessment and SDM training for surgeons. A non-equivalent control group design was used. Newly diagnosed CRC/PC patients aged ≥65 years were included. Primary patient-reported experiences were the quality of SDM (SDM-Q-9, range 0–100), involvement in decision-making (Visual Analog Scale for Involvement in the decision-making process [range 0–10]), satisfaction about decision-making (Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction concerning the decision-making process [range 0–10]), and decisional regret (Decisional Regret Scale [DRS], range 0–100). Only for DRS, lower scores are better. RESULTS: A total of 71.4% of the involved consultants and 42.9% of the involved residents participated in the EASY-GO training. Only 4 trained surgeons consulted patients both before (n=19) and after (n=19) training and were consequently included in the analyses. All patient-reported experience measures showed a consistent but non-significant change in the direction of improved decision-making after training. According to surgeons, decisions were significantly more often made together with the patient after training (before, 38.9% vs after, 73.7%, p=0.04). Sub-analyses per diagnosis showed that patient experiences among older PC patients consistent and clinically relevant changed in the direction of improved decision-making after training (SDM-Q-9 +13.4 [95% CI −7.9; 34.6], VAS-I +0.27 [95% CI −1.1; 1.6], VAS-S +0.88 [95% CI −0.5; 2.2], DRS −10.3 [95% CI −27.8; 7.1]). CONCLUSION: This pilot study strengthens the practical potential of the intervention’s concept among older surgical cancer patients. Dove Medical Press 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5689024/ /pubmed/29184443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S147312 Text en © 2017 Geessink et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Geessink, Noralie H
Schoon, Yvonne
Olde Rikkert, Marcel GM
van Goor, Harry
Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
title Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
title_full Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
title_fullStr Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
title_short Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
title_sort training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29184443
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S147312
work_keys_str_mv AT geessinknoralieh trainingsurgeonsinshareddecisionmakingwithcancerpatientsaged65yearsandolderapilotstudy
AT schoonyvonne trainingsurgeonsinshareddecisionmakingwithcancerpatientsaged65yearsandolderapilotstudy
AT olderikkertmarcelgm trainingsurgeonsinshareddecisionmakingwithcancerpatientsaged65yearsandolderapilotstudy
AT vangoorharry trainingsurgeonsinshareddecisionmakingwithcancerpatientsaged65yearsandolderapilotstudy