Cargando…

Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK

PURPOSE: Our objective was to estimate the economic outcomes of using mirabegron versus antimuscarinics in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) from a societal perspective in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed using Microsoft Excel(®). The time horizon and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nazir, Jameel, Berling, Malin, McCrea, Charles, Fatoye, Francis, Bowditch, Sally, Hakimi, Zalmai, Wagg, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29442303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0011-x
_version_ 1783279301435588608
author Nazir, Jameel
Berling, Malin
McCrea, Charles
Fatoye, Francis
Bowditch, Sally
Hakimi, Zalmai
Wagg, Adrian
author_facet Nazir, Jameel
Berling, Malin
McCrea, Charles
Fatoye, Francis
Bowditch, Sally
Hakimi, Zalmai
Wagg, Adrian
author_sort Nazir, Jameel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Our objective was to estimate the economic outcomes of using mirabegron versus antimuscarinics in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) from a societal perspective in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed using Microsoft Excel(®). The time horizon and cycle length are 12 and 1 months, respectively; and the hypothetical cohort size 100 patients. Antimuscarinic comparators are fesoterodine, oxybutynin extended release (ER) and immediate release (IR), solifenacin, tolterodine ER/IR, trospium ER/IR, darifenacin and flavoxate. Model inputs included real-world treatment patterns data, healthcare resource use (e.g. clinic visits) and direct and indirect costs (e.g. drug acquisition and productivity loss). Model outputs included patient disposition, healthcare resource use, drug acquisition costs and other treatment-related costs over a 1-year time horizon. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the key drivers of the model. RESULTS: In a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients, total annual costs per patient were lower with mirabegron than with all antimuscarinics (£1270.84 vs. 1321.71–1607.48). Healthcare resource use was lower with mirabegron than with all antimuscarinics (115 vs. 119–123 general practitioner visits; 173 vs. 178–185 specialist visits and 0.0042 vs. 0.0050–0.0060 surgical operations) and fewer work hours were lost (4017 vs. 5114–6990 [all per 100 patients]). Sensitivity analysis showed the model was sensitive to persistence and switching rates, although the impact on the overall results was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK, using mirabegron to treat OAB may improve persistence and lead to reductions in switching treatment, healthcare resource utilization, productivity costs, and overall treatment costs versus antimuscarinics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0011-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56890352017-12-18 Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK Nazir, Jameel Berling, Malin McCrea, Charles Fatoye, Francis Bowditch, Sally Hakimi, Zalmai Wagg, Adrian Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article PURPOSE: Our objective was to estimate the economic outcomes of using mirabegron versus antimuscarinics in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder (OAB) from a societal perspective in the UK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed using Microsoft Excel(®). The time horizon and cycle length are 12 and 1 months, respectively; and the hypothetical cohort size 100 patients. Antimuscarinic comparators are fesoterodine, oxybutynin extended release (ER) and immediate release (IR), solifenacin, tolterodine ER/IR, trospium ER/IR, darifenacin and flavoxate. Model inputs included real-world treatment patterns data, healthcare resource use (e.g. clinic visits) and direct and indirect costs (e.g. drug acquisition and productivity loss). Model outputs included patient disposition, healthcare resource use, drug acquisition costs and other treatment-related costs over a 1-year time horizon. A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the key drivers of the model. RESULTS: In a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients, total annual costs per patient were lower with mirabegron than with all antimuscarinics (£1270.84 vs. 1321.71–1607.48). Healthcare resource use was lower with mirabegron than with all antimuscarinics (115 vs. 119–123 general practitioner visits; 173 vs. 178–185 specialist visits and 0.0042 vs. 0.0050–0.0060 surgical operations) and fewer work hours were lost (4017 vs. 5114–6990 [all per 100 patients]). Sensitivity analysis showed the model was sensitive to persistence and switching rates, although the impact on the overall results was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: In the UK, using mirabegron to treat OAB may improve persistence and lead to reductions in switching treatment, healthcare resource utilization, productivity costs, and overall treatment costs versus antimuscarinics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s41669-017-0011-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5689035/ /pubmed/29442303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0011-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Nazir, Jameel
Berling, Malin
McCrea, Charles
Fatoye, Francis
Bowditch, Sally
Hakimi, Zalmai
Wagg, Adrian
Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK
title Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK
title_full Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK
title_fullStr Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK
title_short Economic Impact of Mirabegron Versus Antimuscarinics for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in the UK
title_sort economic impact of mirabegron versus antimuscarinics for the treatment of overactive bladder in the uk
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29442303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0011-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nazirjameel economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk
AT berlingmalin economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk
AT mccreacharles economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk
AT fatoyefrancis economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk
AT bowditchsally economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk
AT hakimizalmai economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk
AT waggadrian economicimpactofmirabegronversusantimuscarinicsforthetreatmentofoveractivebladderintheuk