Cargando…
COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial)
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a key treatment in COPD. However, despite the existing evidence and a strong recommendation from lung associations worldwide, 50% of patients with COPD decline to participate in COPD rehabilitation program an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0488-1 |
_version_ | 1783279326064541696 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Henrik Bieler, Theresa Beyer, Nina Godtfredsen, Nina Kallemose, Thomas Frølich, Anne |
author_facet | Hansen, Henrik Bieler, Theresa Beyer, Nina Godtfredsen, Nina Kallemose, Thomas Frølich, Anne |
author_sort | Hansen, Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a key treatment in COPD. However, despite the existing evidence and a strong recommendation from lung associations worldwide, 50% of patients with COPD decline to participate in COPD rehabilitation program and 30–50% drop-out before completion. The main reasons are severe symptoms, inflexible accessibility and necessity for transportation. Currently there are no well-established and evident rehabilitation alternatives. Supervised online screen rehabilitation could be a useful approach to increase accessibility and compliance. The aim of this multicenter RCT study is to compare the potential benefits of a 10-week online COPD rehabilitation program (CORe) with conventional outpatient COPD rehabilitation (CCRe). METHODS: This study is a randomized assessor- and statistician blinded superiority multicenter trial with two parallel groups, employing 1:1 allocation to the intervention and the comparison group.On the basis of a sample size calculation, 134 patients with severe or very severe COPD and eligible to conventional hospital based outpatient COPD rehabilitation will be included and randomized from eight different hospitals. The CORe intervention group receives group supervised resistance- and endurance training and patient education, 60 min, three times/week for 10 weeks at home via online-screen. The CCRe comparison group receives group based supervised resistance- and endurance training and patient education, 90 min, two times/week for 10 weeks (two hospitals) or 12 weeks (six hospitals) in groups at the local hospital. The primary outcome is change in the 6-min walking distance after 10/12 weeks; the secondary outcomes are changes in 30 s sit-to-stand chair test, physical activity level, symptoms, anxiety and depression symptoms, disease specific and generic quality of life. Primary endpoint is 10/12 weeks from baseline, while secondary endpoints are 22, 36, 62 weeks from baseline assessments. DISCUSSION: The study will likely contribute to knowledge regarding COPD tele-rehabilitation and to which extent it is more feasible and thereby more efficient than conventional COPD rehabilitation in patients with severe and very severe COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02667171. Registration data: January 28th 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56891782017-11-24 COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) Hansen, Henrik Bieler, Theresa Beyer, Nina Godtfredsen, Nina Kallemose, Thomas Frølich, Anne BMC Pulm Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a key treatment in COPD. However, despite the existing evidence and a strong recommendation from lung associations worldwide, 50% of patients with COPD decline to participate in COPD rehabilitation program and 30–50% drop-out before completion. The main reasons are severe symptoms, inflexible accessibility and necessity for transportation. Currently there are no well-established and evident rehabilitation alternatives. Supervised online screen rehabilitation could be a useful approach to increase accessibility and compliance. The aim of this multicenter RCT study is to compare the potential benefits of a 10-week online COPD rehabilitation program (CORe) with conventional outpatient COPD rehabilitation (CCRe). METHODS: This study is a randomized assessor- and statistician blinded superiority multicenter trial with two parallel groups, employing 1:1 allocation to the intervention and the comparison group.On the basis of a sample size calculation, 134 patients with severe or very severe COPD and eligible to conventional hospital based outpatient COPD rehabilitation will be included and randomized from eight different hospitals. The CORe intervention group receives group supervised resistance- and endurance training and patient education, 60 min, three times/week for 10 weeks at home via online-screen. The CCRe comparison group receives group based supervised resistance- and endurance training and patient education, 90 min, two times/week for 10 weeks (two hospitals) or 12 weeks (six hospitals) in groups at the local hospital. The primary outcome is change in the 6-min walking distance after 10/12 weeks; the secondary outcomes are changes in 30 s sit-to-stand chair test, physical activity level, symptoms, anxiety and depression symptoms, disease specific and generic quality of life. Primary endpoint is 10/12 weeks from baseline, while secondary endpoints are 22, 36, 62 weeks from baseline assessments. DISCUSSION: The study will likely contribute to knowledge regarding COPD tele-rehabilitation and to which extent it is more feasible and thereby more efficient than conventional COPD rehabilitation in patients with severe and very severe COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02667171. Registration data: January 28th 2016. BioMed Central 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5689178/ /pubmed/29145831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0488-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hansen, Henrik Bieler, Theresa Beyer, Nina Godtfredsen, Nina Kallemose, Thomas Frølich, Anne COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) |
title | COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) |
title_full | COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) |
title_fullStr | COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) |
title_full_unstemmed | COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) |
title_short | COPD online-rehabilitation versus conventional COPD rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (CORe trial) |
title_sort | copd online-rehabilitation versus conventional copd rehabilitation – rationale and design for a multicenter randomized controlled trial study protocol (core trial) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0488-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenhenrik copdonlinerehabilitationversusconventionalcopdrehabilitationrationaleanddesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocolcoretrial AT bielertheresa copdonlinerehabilitationversusconventionalcopdrehabilitationrationaleanddesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocolcoretrial AT beyernina copdonlinerehabilitationversusconventionalcopdrehabilitationrationaleanddesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocolcoretrial AT godtfredsennina copdonlinerehabilitationversusconventionalcopdrehabilitationrationaleanddesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocolcoretrial AT kallemosethomas copdonlinerehabilitationversusconventionalcopdrehabilitationrationaleanddesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocolcoretrial AT frølichanne copdonlinerehabilitationversusconventionalcopdrehabilitationrationaleanddesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocolcoretrial |