Cargando…

Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module

OBJECTIVE: To carry out preliminary evaluation of a training module for doctors to enhance their ability to involve their patients in medical decision making. The training refers to the shared decision‐making (SDM) communication concept. METHODS: The training module includes a comprehensive manual,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasper, Jürgen, Liethmann, Katrin, Heesen, Christoph, Reissmann, Daniel R, Geiger, Friedemann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28521082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12565
_version_ 1783279338923229184
author Kasper, Jürgen
Liethmann, Katrin
Heesen, Christoph
Reissmann, Daniel R
Geiger, Friedemann
author_facet Kasper, Jürgen
Liethmann, Katrin
Heesen, Christoph
Reissmann, Daniel R
Geiger, Friedemann
author_sort Kasper, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To carry out preliminary evaluation of a training module for doctors to enhance their ability to involve their patients in medical decision making. The training refers to the shared decision‐making (SDM) communication concept. METHODS: The training module includes a comprehensive manual, a corresponding video tutorial with communication examples and a 15‐minute face‐to‐face feedback session based on an SDM analysis of a consultation recording provided by the trainee. Ten trainees (four neurologists, three dentists, and three general practitioners) participating in the pretest each recorded four clinical consultations (total sample: N=40) and received three training components. After the training, doctors provided feedback on the module's feasibility in a questionnaire. Communication performance of doctors, patients and doctor–patient dyads was assessed by trained observers and self‐assessed by doctors and patients using the MAPPIN’SDM approach. Training effects were determined using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests comparing baseline values with post‐intervention performance as assessed in the fourth consultations. RESULTS: The face‐to‐face training sessions were short and feasible with regard to clinical reality. Participants considered the training supportive for acquiring SDM skills and recommended more emphasis on the face‐to‐face feedback. Communication improved according to observers rating doctors (P=.05) and doctor–patient dyads (P=.07) and to doctors’ own judgements (P=.02). No improvement was observed in patients’ SDM behaviour (P=.11); accordingly, patients’ judgements did not indicate improvement (P=.14). CONCLUSIONS: The training is designed to meet clinicians’ needs. Improvement of risk communication after training encourages optimization according to doctors’ feedback. Following this study, the efficacy of the training is now being examined in a randomized controlled trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56892312017-12-01 Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module Kasper, Jürgen Liethmann, Katrin Heesen, Christoph Reissmann, Daniel R Geiger, Friedemann Health Expect Original Research Papers OBJECTIVE: To carry out preliminary evaluation of a training module for doctors to enhance their ability to involve their patients in medical decision making. The training refers to the shared decision‐making (SDM) communication concept. METHODS: The training module includes a comprehensive manual, a corresponding video tutorial with communication examples and a 15‐minute face‐to‐face feedback session based on an SDM analysis of a consultation recording provided by the trainee. Ten trainees (four neurologists, three dentists, and three general practitioners) participating in the pretest each recorded four clinical consultations (total sample: N=40) and received three training components. After the training, doctors provided feedback on the module's feasibility in a questionnaire. Communication performance of doctors, patients and doctor–patient dyads was assessed by trained observers and self‐assessed by doctors and patients using the MAPPIN’SDM approach. Training effects were determined using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests comparing baseline values with post‐intervention performance as assessed in the fourth consultations. RESULTS: The face‐to‐face training sessions were short and feasible with regard to clinical reality. Participants considered the training supportive for acquiring SDM skills and recommended more emphasis on the face‐to‐face feedback. Communication improved according to observers rating doctors (P=.05) and doctor–patient dyads (P=.07) and to doctors’ own judgements (P=.02). No improvement was observed in patients’ SDM behaviour (P=.11); accordingly, patients’ judgements did not indicate improvement (P=.14). CONCLUSIONS: The training is designed to meet clinicians’ needs. Improvement of risk communication after training encourages optimization according to doctors’ feedback. Following this study, the efficacy of the training is now being examined in a randomized controlled trial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-18 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5689231/ /pubmed/28521082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12565 Text en © 2017 The Authors Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Kasper, Jürgen
Liethmann, Katrin
Heesen, Christoph
Reissmann, Daniel R
Geiger, Friedemann
Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module
title Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module
title_full Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module
title_fullStr Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module
title_full_unstemmed Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module
title_short Training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—Preliminary testing of a newly developed module
title_sort training doctors briefly and in situ to involve their patients in making medical decisions—preliminary testing of a newly developed module
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28521082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12565
work_keys_str_mv AT kasperjurgen trainingdoctorsbrieflyandinsitutoinvolvetheirpatientsinmakingmedicaldecisionspreliminarytestingofanewlydevelopedmodule
AT liethmannkatrin trainingdoctorsbrieflyandinsitutoinvolvetheirpatientsinmakingmedicaldecisionspreliminarytestingofanewlydevelopedmodule
AT heesenchristoph trainingdoctorsbrieflyandinsitutoinvolvetheirpatientsinmakingmedicaldecisionspreliminarytestingofanewlydevelopedmodule
AT reissmanndanielr trainingdoctorsbrieflyandinsitutoinvolvetheirpatientsinmakingmedicaldecisionspreliminarytestingofanewlydevelopedmodule
AT geigerfriedemann trainingdoctorsbrieflyandinsitutoinvolvetheirpatientsinmakingmedicaldecisionspreliminarytestingofanewlydevelopedmodule