Cargando…

Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces

There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double‐prosth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulu, David, Alaei, Parham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12060
_version_ 1783279470886518784
author Paulu, David
Alaei, Parham
author_facet Paulu, David
Alaei, Parham
author_sort Paulu, David
collection PubMed
description There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double‐prosthesis. Modern treatment planning systems employ algorithms with improved dose calculation accuracies but even these algorithms may not predict the dose accurately at high atomic number interfaces. The current study evaluates the dose calculation accuracy of three common dose calculation algorithms employed in two commercial treatment planning systems. A hip prosthesis was molded inside a cylindrical phantom and the dose at several points within the phantom at the interface with prosthesis was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The measured doses were then compared to the predicted ones by the planning systems. The results of the study indicate all three algorithms underestimate the dose at the prosthesis interface, albeit to varying degrees, and for both low‐ and high‐energy x rays. The measured doses are higher than calculated ones by 5–22% for Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm, 2–23% for Eclipse Acuros XB, and 6–25% for Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. There are generally better agreements for AXB algorithm and the worst results are for the AAA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56898502018-04-02 Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces Paulu, David Alaei, Parham J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double‐prosthesis. Modern treatment planning systems employ algorithms with improved dose calculation accuracies but even these algorithms may not predict the dose accurately at high atomic number interfaces. The current study evaluates the dose calculation accuracy of three common dose calculation algorithms employed in two commercial treatment planning systems. A hip prosthesis was molded inside a cylindrical phantom and the dose at several points within the phantom at the interface with prosthesis was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The measured doses were then compared to the predicted ones by the planning systems. The results of the study indicate all three algorithms underestimate the dose at the prosthesis interface, albeit to varying degrees, and for both low‐ and high‐energy x rays. The measured doses are higher than calculated ones by 5–22% for Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm, 2–23% for Eclipse Acuros XB, and 6–25% for Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. There are generally better agreements for AXB algorithm and the worst results are for the AAA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5689850/ /pubmed/28317312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12060 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Paulu, David
Alaei, Parham
Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
title Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
title_full Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
title_fullStr Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
title_short Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
title_sort evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12060
work_keys_str_mv AT pauludavid evaluationofdosecalculationaccuracyoftreatmentplanningsystemsathipprosthesisinterfaces
AT alaeiparham evaluationofdosecalculationaccuracyoftreatmentplanningsystemsathipprosthesisinterfaces