Cargando…
Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces
There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double‐prosth...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12060 |
_version_ | 1783279470886518784 |
---|---|
author | Paulu, David Alaei, Parham |
author_facet | Paulu, David Alaei, Parham |
author_sort | Paulu, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double‐prosthesis. Modern treatment planning systems employ algorithms with improved dose calculation accuracies but even these algorithms may not predict the dose accurately at high atomic number interfaces. The current study evaluates the dose calculation accuracy of three common dose calculation algorithms employed in two commercial treatment planning systems. A hip prosthesis was molded inside a cylindrical phantom and the dose at several points within the phantom at the interface with prosthesis was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The measured doses were then compared to the predicted ones by the planning systems. The results of the study indicate all three algorithms underestimate the dose at the prosthesis interface, albeit to varying degrees, and for both low‐ and high‐energy x rays. The measured doses are higher than calculated ones by 5–22% for Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm, 2–23% for Eclipse Acuros XB, and 6–25% for Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. There are generally better agreements for AXB algorithm and the worst results are for the AAA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56898502018-04-02 Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces Paulu, David Alaei, Parham J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics There are an increasing number of radiation therapy patients with hip prosthesis. The common method of minimizing treatment planning inaccuracies is to avoid radiation beams to transit through the prosthesis. However, the beams often exit through them, especially when the patient has a double‐prosthesis. Modern treatment planning systems employ algorithms with improved dose calculation accuracies but even these algorithms may not predict the dose accurately at high atomic number interfaces. The current study evaluates the dose calculation accuracy of three common dose calculation algorithms employed in two commercial treatment planning systems. A hip prosthesis was molded inside a cylindrical phantom and the dose at several points within the phantom at the interface with prosthesis was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The measured doses were then compared to the predicted ones by the planning systems. The results of the study indicate all three algorithms underestimate the dose at the prosthesis interface, albeit to varying degrees, and for both low‐ and high‐energy x rays. The measured doses are higher than calculated ones by 5–22% for Pinnacle Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm, 2–23% for Eclipse Acuros XB, and 6–25% for Eclipse Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. There are generally better agreements for AXB algorithm and the worst results are for the AAA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5689850/ /pubmed/28317312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12060 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Paulu, David Alaei, Parham Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
title | Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
title_full | Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
title_short | Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
title_sort | evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28317312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pauludavid evaluationofdosecalculationaccuracyoftreatmentplanningsystemsathipprosthesisinterfaces AT alaeiparham evaluationofdosecalculationaccuracyoftreatmentplanningsystemsathipprosthesisinterfaces |