Cargando…

Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data

PURPOSE: Commissioning beam data for proton spot scanning beams are compared for the first two Varian ProBeam sites in the United States, at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC) and Scripps Proton Therapy Center (SPTC). In addition, the extent to which beams can be matched between gantry room...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langner, Ulrich W., Eley, John G., Dong, Lei, Langen, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12078
_version_ 1783279473276223488
author Langner, Ulrich W.
Eley, John G.
Dong, Lei
Langen, Katja
author_facet Langner, Ulrich W.
Eley, John G.
Dong, Lei
Langen, Katja
author_sort Langner, Ulrich W.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Commissioning beam data for proton spot scanning beams are compared for the first two Varian ProBeam sites in the United States, at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC) and Scripps Proton Therapy Center (SPTC). In addition, the extent to which beams can be matched between gantry rooms at MPTC is investigated. METHOD: Beam data for the two sites were acquired with independent dosimetry systems and compared. Integrated depth dose curves (IDDs) were acquired with Bragg peak ion chambers in a 3D water tank for pencil beams at both sites. Spot profiles were acquired at different distances from the isocenter at a gantry angle of 0° as well as a function of gantry angles. Absolute dose calibration was compared between SPTC and the gantries at MPTC. Dosimetric verification of test plans, output as a function of gantry angle, monitor unit (MU) linearity, end effects, dose rate dependence, and plan reproducibility were compared for different gantries at MPTC. RESULTS: The IDDs for the two sites were similar, except in the plateau region, where the SPTC data were on average 4.5% higher for lower energies. This increase in the plateau region decreased as energy increased, with no marked difference for energies higher than 180 MeV. Range in water coincided for all energies within 0.5 mm. The sigmas of the spot profiles in air were within 10% agreement at isocenter. This difference increased as detector distance from the isocenter increased. Absolute doses for the gantries measured at both sites were within 1% agreement. Test plans, output as function of gantry angle, MU linearity, end effects, dose rate dependence, and plan reproducibility were all within tolerances given by TG142. CONCLUSION: Beam data for the two sites and between different gantry rooms were well matched.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56898622018-04-02 Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data Langner, Ulrich W. Eley, John G. Dong, Lei Langen, Katja J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Commissioning beam data for proton spot scanning beams are compared for the first two Varian ProBeam sites in the United States, at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC) and Scripps Proton Therapy Center (SPTC). In addition, the extent to which beams can be matched between gantry rooms at MPTC is investigated. METHOD: Beam data for the two sites were acquired with independent dosimetry systems and compared. Integrated depth dose curves (IDDs) were acquired with Bragg peak ion chambers in a 3D water tank for pencil beams at both sites. Spot profiles were acquired at different distances from the isocenter at a gantry angle of 0° as well as a function of gantry angles. Absolute dose calibration was compared between SPTC and the gantries at MPTC. Dosimetric verification of test plans, output as a function of gantry angle, monitor unit (MU) linearity, end effects, dose rate dependence, and plan reproducibility were compared for different gantries at MPTC. RESULTS: The IDDs for the two sites were similar, except in the plateau region, where the SPTC data were on average 4.5% higher for lower energies. This increase in the plateau region decreased as energy increased, with no marked difference for energies higher than 180 MeV. Range in water coincided for all energies within 0.5 mm. The sigmas of the spot profiles in air were within 10% agreement at isocenter. This difference increased as detector distance from the isocenter increased. Absolute doses for the gantries measured at both sites were within 1% agreement. Test plans, output as function of gantry angle, MU linearity, end effects, dose rate dependence, and plan reproducibility were all within tolerances given by TG142. CONCLUSION: Beam data for the two sites and between different gantry rooms were well matched. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5689862/ /pubmed/28422381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12078 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Langner, Ulrich W.
Eley, John G.
Dong, Lei
Langen, Katja
Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
title Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
title_full Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
title_fullStr Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
title_short Comparison of multi‐institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
title_sort comparison of multi‐institutional varian probeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28422381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12078
work_keys_str_mv AT langnerulrichw comparisonofmultiinstitutionalvarianprobeampencilbeamscanningprotonbeamcommissioningdata
AT eleyjohng comparisonofmultiinstitutionalvarianprobeampencilbeamscanningprotonbeamcommissioningdata
AT donglei comparisonofmultiinstitutionalvarianprobeampencilbeamscanningprotonbeamcommissioningdata
AT langenkatja comparisonofmultiinstitutionalvarianprobeampencilbeamscanningprotonbeamcommissioningdata