Cargando…
Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate experimentally the accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm AcurosXB in small field highly modulated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). METHOD: The 1000SRS detector array inserted in the rotational Octavius 4D phantom (PTW) was used for 3D dose...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12029 |
_version_ | 1783279476413562880 |
---|---|
author | Swinnen, Ans C.C. Öllers, Michel C. Roijen, Erik Nijsten, Sebastiaan M. Verhaegen, Frank |
author_facet | Swinnen, Ans C.C. Öllers, Michel C. Roijen, Erik Nijsten, Sebastiaan M. Verhaegen, Frank |
author_sort | Swinnen, Ans C.C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate experimentally the accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm AcurosXB in small field highly modulated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). METHOD: The 1000SRS detector array inserted in the rotational Octavius 4D phantom (PTW) was used for 3D dose verification of VMAT treatments characterized by small to very small targets. Clinical treatment plans (n = 28) were recalculated on the phantom CT data set in the Eclipse TPS. All measurements were done on a Varian TrueBeamSTx, which can provide the jaw tracking technique (JTT). The effect of disabling the JTT, thereby fixing the jaws at static field size of 3 × 3 cm(2) and applying the MLC to shape the smallest apertures, was investigated for static fields between 0.5 × 0.5−3 × 3 cm(2) and for seven VMAT patients with small brain metastases. The dose calculation accuracy has been evaluated by comparing the measured and calculated dose outputs and dose distributions. The dosimetric agreement has been presented by a local gamma evaluation criterion of 2%/2 mm. RESULTS: Regarding the clinical plans, the mean ± SD of the volumetric gamma evaluation scores considering the dose levels for evaluation of 10%, 50%, 80% and 95% are (96.0 ± 6.9)%, (95.2 ± 6.8)%, (86.7 ± 14.8)% and (56.3 ± 42.3)% respectively. For the smallest field VMAT treatments, discrepancies between calculated and measured doses up to 16% are obtained. The difference between the 1000SRS central chamber measurements compared to the calculated dose outputs for static fields 3 × 3, 2 × 2, 1 × 1 and 0.5 × 0.5 cm(2) collimated with MLC whereby jaws are fixed at 3 × 3 cm(2) and for static fields shaped with the collimator jaws only (MLC retracted), is on average respectively, 0.2%, 0.8%, 6.8%, 5.7% (6 MV) and 0.1%, 1.3%, 11.7%, 21.6% (10 MV). For the seven brain mets patients was found that the smaller the target volumes, the higher the improvement in agreement between measured and calculated doses after disabling the JTT. CONCLUSION: Fixing the jaws at 3 × 3 cm(2) and using the MLC with high positional accuracy to shape the smallest apertures in contrast to the JTT is currently found to be the most accurate treatment technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56898752018-04-02 Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans Swinnen, Ans C.C. Öllers, Michel C. Roijen, Erik Nijsten, Sebastiaan M. Verhaegen, Frank J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate experimentally the accuracy of the dose calculation algorithm AcurosXB in small field highly modulated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). METHOD: The 1000SRS detector array inserted in the rotational Octavius 4D phantom (PTW) was used for 3D dose verification of VMAT treatments characterized by small to very small targets. Clinical treatment plans (n = 28) were recalculated on the phantom CT data set in the Eclipse TPS. All measurements were done on a Varian TrueBeamSTx, which can provide the jaw tracking technique (JTT). The effect of disabling the JTT, thereby fixing the jaws at static field size of 3 × 3 cm(2) and applying the MLC to shape the smallest apertures, was investigated for static fields between 0.5 × 0.5−3 × 3 cm(2) and for seven VMAT patients with small brain metastases. The dose calculation accuracy has been evaluated by comparing the measured and calculated dose outputs and dose distributions. The dosimetric agreement has been presented by a local gamma evaluation criterion of 2%/2 mm. RESULTS: Regarding the clinical plans, the mean ± SD of the volumetric gamma evaluation scores considering the dose levels for evaluation of 10%, 50%, 80% and 95% are (96.0 ± 6.9)%, (95.2 ± 6.8)%, (86.7 ± 14.8)% and (56.3 ± 42.3)% respectively. For the smallest field VMAT treatments, discrepancies between calculated and measured doses up to 16% are obtained. The difference between the 1000SRS central chamber measurements compared to the calculated dose outputs for static fields 3 × 3, 2 × 2, 1 × 1 and 0.5 × 0.5 cm(2) collimated with MLC whereby jaws are fixed at 3 × 3 cm(2) and for static fields shaped with the collimator jaws only (MLC retracted), is on average respectively, 0.2%, 0.8%, 6.8%, 5.7% (6 MV) and 0.1%, 1.3%, 11.7%, 21.6% (10 MV). For the seven brain mets patients was found that the smaller the target volumes, the higher the improvement in agreement between measured and calculated doses after disabling the JTT. CONCLUSION: Fixing the jaws at 3 × 3 cm(2) and using the MLC with high positional accuracy to shape the smallest apertures in contrast to the JTT is currently found to be the most accurate treatment technique. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5689875/ /pubmed/28291941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12029 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Swinnen, Ans C.C. Öllers, Michel C. Roijen, Erik Nijsten, Sebastiaan M. Verhaegen, Frank Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans |
title | Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans |
title_full | Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans |
title_fullStr | Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans |
title_short | Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans |
title_sort | influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field vmat plans |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swinnenanscc influenceofthejawtrackingtechniqueonthedosecalculationaccuracyofsmallfieldvmatplans AT ollersmichelc influenceofthejawtrackingtechniqueonthedosecalculationaccuracyofsmallfieldvmatplans AT roijenerik influenceofthejawtrackingtechniqueonthedosecalculationaccuracyofsmallfieldvmatplans AT nijstensebastiaanm influenceofthejawtrackingtechniqueonthedosecalculationaccuracyofsmallfieldvmatplans AT verhaegenfrank influenceofthejawtrackingtechniqueonthedosecalculationaccuracyofsmallfieldvmatplans |