Cargando…

Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking

To perform dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) for clinical applications safely and accurately, gimbaled head swing verification is important. We propose a quantitative gimbaled head swing verification method for daily quality assurance (QA), which uses feature point tracking and a web camera. The web came...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miura, Hideharu, Ozawa, Shuichi, Enosaki, Tsubasa, Kawakubo, Atsushi, Hosono, Fumika, Yamada, Kiyoshi, Nagata, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12004
_version_ 1783279478087090176
author Miura, Hideharu
Ozawa, Shuichi
Enosaki, Tsubasa
Kawakubo, Atsushi
Hosono, Fumika
Yamada, Kiyoshi
Nagata, Yasushi
author_facet Miura, Hideharu
Ozawa, Shuichi
Enosaki, Tsubasa
Kawakubo, Atsushi
Hosono, Fumika
Yamada, Kiyoshi
Nagata, Yasushi
author_sort Miura, Hideharu
collection PubMed
description To perform dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) for clinical applications safely and accurately, gimbaled head swing verification is important. We propose a quantitative gimbaled head swing verification method for daily quality assurance (QA), which uses feature point tracking and a web camera. The web camera was placed on a couch at the same position for every gimbaled head swing verification, and could move based on a determined input function (sinusoidal patterns; amplitude: ± 20 mm; cycle: 3 s) in the pan and tilt directions at isocenter plane. Two continuous images were then analyzed for each feature point using the pyramidal Lucas–Kanade (LK) method, which is an optical flow estimation algorithm. We used a tapped hole as a feature point of the gimbaled head. The period and amplitude were analyzed to acquire a quantitative gimbaled head swing value for daily QA. The mean ± SD of the period were 3.00 ± 0.03 (range: 3.00–3.07) s and 3.00 ± 0.02 (range: 3.00–3.07) s in the pan and tilt directions, respectively. The mean ± SD of the relative displacement were 19.7 ± 0.08 (range: 19.6–19.8) mm and 18.9 ± 0.2 (range: 18.4–19.5) mm in the pan and tilt directions, respectively. The gimbaled head swing was reliable for DTT. We propose a quantitative gimbaled head swing verification method for daily QA using the feature point tracking method and a web camera. Our method can quantitatively assess the gimbaled head swing for daily QA from baseline values, measured at the time of acceptance and commissioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56898842018-04-02 Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking Miura, Hideharu Ozawa, Shuichi Enosaki, Tsubasa Kawakubo, Atsushi Hosono, Fumika Yamada, Kiyoshi Nagata, Yasushi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics To perform dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) for clinical applications safely and accurately, gimbaled head swing verification is important. We propose a quantitative gimbaled head swing verification method for daily quality assurance (QA), which uses feature point tracking and a web camera. The web camera was placed on a couch at the same position for every gimbaled head swing verification, and could move based on a determined input function (sinusoidal patterns; amplitude: ± 20 mm; cycle: 3 s) in the pan and tilt directions at isocenter plane. Two continuous images were then analyzed for each feature point using the pyramidal Lucas–Kanade (LK) method, which is an optical flow estimation algorithm. We used a tapped hole as a feature point of the gimbaled head. The period and amplitude were analyzed to acquire a quantitative gimbaled head swing value for daily QA. The mean ± SD of the period were 3.00 ± 0.03 (range: 3.00–3.07) s and 3.00 ± 0.02 (range: 3.00–3.07) s in the pan and tilt directions, respectively. The mean ± SD of the relative displacement were 19.7 ± 0.08 (range: 19.6–19.8) mm and 18.9 ± 0.2 (range: 18.4–19.5) mm in the pan and tilt directions, respectively. The gimbaled head swing was reliable for DTT. We propose a quantitative gimbaled head swing verification method for daily QA using the feature point tracking method and a web camera. Our method can quantitatively assess the gimbaled head swing for daily QA from baseline values, measured at the time of acceptance and commissioning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5689884/ /pubmed/28291928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12004 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Miura, Hideharu
Ozawa, Shuichi
Enosaki, Tsubasa
Kawakubo, Atsushi
Hosono, Fumika
Yamada, Kiyoshi
Nagata, Yasushi
Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
title Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
title_full Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
title_fullStr Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
title_full_unstemmed Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
title_short Quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
title_sort quality assurance of a gimbaled head swing verification using feature point tracking
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12004
work_keys_str_mv AT miurahideharu qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking
AT ozawashuichi qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking
AT enosakitsubasa qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking
AT kawakuboatsushi qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking
AT hosonofumika qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking
AT yamadakiyoshi qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking
AT nagatayasushi qualityassuranceofagimbaledheadswingverificationusingfeaturepointtracking