Cargando…

Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”

The AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG) 5.a provides concise guidance on the commissioning and QA of beam modeling and dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment planning systems. This work discusses the implementation of the validation testing recommended in MPPG 5.a at two institutions....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacqmin, Dustin J., Bredfeldt, Jeremy S., Frigo, Sean P., Smilowitz, Jennifer B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12015
_version_ 1783279479537270784
author Jacqmin, Dustin J.
Bredfeldt, Jeremy S.
Frigo, Sean P.
Smilowitz, Jennifer B.
author_facet Jacqmin, Dustin J.
Bredfeldt, Jeremy S.
Frigo, Sean P.
Smilowitz, Jennifer B.
author_sort Jacqmin, Dustin J.
collection PubMed
description The AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG) 5.a provides concise guidance on the commissioning and QA of beam modeling and dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment planning systems. This work discusses the implementation of the validation testing recommended in MPPG 5.a at two institutions. The two institutions worked collaboratively to create a common set of treatment fields and analysis tools to deliver and analyze the validation tests. This included the development of a novel, open‐source software tool to compare scanning water tank measurements to 3D DICOM‐RT Dose distributions. Dose calculation algorithms in both Pinnacle and Eclipse were tested with MPPG 5.a to validate the modeling of Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators. The validation process resulted in more than 200 water tank scans and more than 50 point measurements per institution, each of which was compared to a dose calculation from the institution's treatment planning system (TPS). Overall, the validation testing recommended in MPPG 5.a took approximately 79 person‐hours for a machine with four photon and five electron energies for a single TPS. Of the 79 person‐hours, 26 person‐hours required time on the machine, and the remainder involved preparation and analysis. The basic photon, electron, and heterogeneity correction tests were evaluated with the tolerances in MPPG 5.a, and the tolerances were met for all tests. The MPPG 5.a evaluation criteria were used to assess the small field and IMRT/VMAT validation tests. Both institutions found the use of MPPG 5.a to be a valuable resource during the commissioning process. The validation testing in MPPG 5.a showed the strengths and limitations of the TPS models. In addition, the data collected during the validation testing is useful for routine QA of the TPS, validation of software upgrades, and commissioning of new algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56898902018-04-02 Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams” Jacqmin, Dustin J. Bredfeldt, Jeremy S. Frigo, Sean P. Smilowitz, Jennifer B. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG) 5.a provides concise guidance on the commissioning and QA of beam modeling and dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment planning systems. This work discusses the implementation of the validation testing recommended in MPPG 5.a at two institutions. The two institutions worked collaboratively to create a common set of treatment fields and analysis tools to deliver and analyze the validation tests. This included the development of a novel, open‐source software tool to compare scanning water tank measurements to 3D DICOM‐RT Dose distributions. Dose calculation algorithms in both Pinnacle and Eclipse were tested with MPPG 5.a to validate the modeling of Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators. The validation process resulted in more than 200 water tank scans and more than 50 point measurements per institution, each of which was compared to a dose calculation from the institution's treatment planning system (TPS). Overall, the validation testing recommended in MPPG 5.a took approximately 79 person‐hours for a machine with four photon and five electron energies for a single TPS. Of the 79 person‐hours, 26 person‐hours required time on the machine, and the remainder involved preparation and analysis. The basic photon, electron, and heterogeneity correction tests were evaluated with the tolerances in MPPG 5.a, and the tolerances were met for all tests. The MPPG 5.a evaluation criteria were used to assess the small field and IMRT/VMAT validation tests. Both institutions found the use of MPPG 5.a to be a valuable resource during the commissioning process. The validation testing in MPPG 5.a showed the strengths and limitations of the TPS models. In addition, the data collected during the validation testing is useful for routine QA of the TPS, validation of software upgrades, and commissioning of new algorithms. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5689890/ /pubmed/28291929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12015 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Jacqmin, Dustin J.
Bredfeldt, Jeremy S.
Frigo, Sean P.
Smilowitz, Jennifer B.
Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
title Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
title_full Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
title_fullStr Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
title_short Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a “Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
title_sort implementation of the validation testing in mppg 5.a “commissioning and qa of treatment planning dose calculations–megavoltage photon and electron beams”
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12015
work_keys_str_mv AT jacqmindustinj implementationofthevalidationtestinginmppg5acommissioningandqaoftreatmentplanningdosecalculationsmegavoltagephotonandelectronbeams
AT bredfeldtjeremys implementationofthevalidationtestinginmppg5acommissioningandqaoftreatmentplanningdosecalculationsmegavoltagephotonandelectronbeams
AT frigoseanp implementationofthevalidationtestinginmppg5acommissioningandqaoftreatmentplanningdosecalculationsmegavoltagephotonandelectronbeams
AT smilowitzjenniferb implementationofthevalidationtestinginmppg5acommissioningandqaoftreatmentplanningdosecalculationsmegavoltagephotonandelectronbeams