Cargando…

Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Heeteak, Polf, Jerimy, Badiyan, Shahed, Biagioli, Matthew, Fernandez, Daniel, Latifi, Kujtim, Wilder, Richard, Mehta, Minesh, Chuong, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12001
_version_ 1783279482409320448
author Chung, Heeteak
Polf, Jerimy
Badiyan, Shahed
Biagioli, Matthew
Fernandez, Daniel
Latifi, Kujtim
Wilder, Richard
Mehta, Minesh
Chuong, Michael
author_facet Chung, Heeteak
Polf, Jerimy
Badiyan, Shahed
Biagioli, Matthew
Fernandez, Daniel
Latifi, Kujtim
Wilder, Richard
Mehta, Minesh
Chuong, Michael
author_sort Chung, Heeteak
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who received photon therapy (12 with rectal spacer (DuraSeal™ gel) and 8 without). Two PBS treatment plans were retrospectively created for each patient using the following beam arrangements: (1) lateral‐opposed (LAT) fields and (2) left and right anterior oblique (LAO/RAO) fields. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and right and left femoral heads. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity was calculated using the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model and compared between patients with and without the rectal spacer. A significantly lower mean rectal DVH was achieved in patients with rectal spacer compared to those without. For LAT plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 4.19 and 13.5%, respectively. For LAO/RAO plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 5.07 and 13.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found in any rectal dosimetric parameters between the LAT and the LAO/RAO plans generated with the rectal spacers. We found that ≥ 9 mm space resulted in a significant decrease in NTCP modeled for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity. Rectal spacers can significantly decrease modeled rectal dose and predicted ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated in silico with PBS. A minimum of 9 mm separation between the prostate and anterior rectal wall yields the largest benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899022018-04-02 Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer Chung, Heeteak Polf, Jerimy Badiyan, Shahed Biagioli, Matthew Fernandez, Daniel Latifi, Kujtim Wilder, Richard Mehta, Minesh Chuong, Michael J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who received photon therapy (12 with rectal spacer (DuraSeal™ gel) and 8 without). Two PBS treatment plans were retrospectively created for each patient using the following beam arrangements: (1) lateral‐opposed (LAT) fields and (2) left and right anterior oblique (LAO/RAO) fields. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and right and left femoral heads. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity was calculated using the Lyman–Kutcher–Burman model and compared between patients with and without the rectal spacer. A significantly lower mean rectal DVH was achieved in patients with rectal spacer compared to those without. For LAT plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 4.19 and 13.5%, respectively. For LAO/RAO plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 5.07 and 13.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found in any rectal dosimetric parameters between the LAT and the LAO/RAO plans generated with the rectal spacers. We found that ≥ 9 mm space resulted in a significant decrease in NTCP modeled for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity. Rectal spacers can significantly decrease modeled rectal dose and predicted ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated in silico with PBS. A minimum of 9 mm separation between the prostate and anterior rectal wall yields the largest benefit. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5689902/ /pubmed/28291917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12001 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chung, Heeteak
Polf, Jerimy
Badiyan, Shahed
Biagioli, Matthew
Fernandez, Daniel
Latifi, Kujtim
Wilder, Richard
Mehta, Minesh
Chuong, Michael
Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
title Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
title_full Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
title_fullStr Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
title_full_unstemmed Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
title_short Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
title_sort rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28291917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12001
work_keys_str_mv AT chungheeteak rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT polfjerimy rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT badiyanshahed rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT biagiolimatthew rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT fernandezdaniel rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT latifikujtim rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT wilderrichard rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT mehtaminesh rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer
AT chuongmichael rectaldosetoprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithprotontherapywithorwithoutrectalspacer