Cargando…
Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
PURPOSE: Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12172 |
_version_ | 1783279486920294400 |
---|---|
author | Qiu, Jianfeng Harold Li, H. Zhang, Tiezhi Ma, Fangfang Yang, Deshan |
author_facet | Qiu, Jianfeng Harold Li, H. Zhang, Tiezhi Ma, Fangfang Yang, Deshan |
author_sort | Qiu, Jianfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. The goal was to provide tissue contrast optimized for each treatment site in order to support accurate patient daily treatment setup and the subsequent offline review. METHODS: The proposed method processes the 2D x‐ray images with an optimized image processing filter chain, which consists of a noise reduction filter and a high‐pass filter followed by a contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) filter. The most important innovation is to optimize the image processing parameters automatically to determine the required image contrast settings per disease site and imaging modality. Three major parameters controlling the image processing chain, i.e., the Gaussian smoothing weighting factor for the high‐pass filter, the block size, and the clip limiting parameter for the CLAHE filter, were determined automatically using an interior‐point constrained optimization algorithm. RESULTS: Fifty‐two kV and MV x‐ray images were included in this study. The results were manually evaluated and ranked with scores from 1 (worst, unacceptable) to 5 (significantly better than adequate and visually praise worthy) by physicians and physicists. The average scores for the images processed by the proposed method, the CLAHE, and the best window‐level adjustment were 3.92, 2.83, and 2.27, respectively. The percentage of the processed images received a score of 5 were 48, 29, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems. When the proposed method is implemented in the clinical systems as an automatic image processing filter, it could be useful for allowing quicker and potentially more accurate treatment setup and facilitating the subsequent offline review and verification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56899212018-04-02 Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization Qiu, Jianfeng Harold Li, H. Zhang, Tiezhi Ma, Fangfang Yang, Deshan J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. The goal was to provide tissue contrast optimized for each treatment site in order to support accurate patient daily treatment setup and the subsequent offline review. METHODS: The proposed method processes the 2D x‐ray images with an optimized image processing filter chain, which consists of a noise reduction filter and a high‐pass filter followed by a contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) filter. The most important innovation is to optimize the image processing parameters automatically to determine the required image contrast settings per disease site and imaging modality. Three major parameters controlling the image processing chain, i.e., the Gaussian smoothing weighting factor for the high‐pass filter, the block size, and the clip limiting parameter for the CLAHE filter, were determined automatically using an interior‐point constrained optimization algorithm. RESULTS: Fifty‐two kV and MV x‐ray images were included in this study. The results were manually evaluated and ranked with scores from 1 (worst, unacceptable) to 5 (significantly better than adequate and visually praise worthy) by physicians and physicists. The average scores for the images processed by the proposed method, the CLAHE, and the best window‐level adjustment were 3.92, 2.83, and 2.27, respectively. The percentage of the processed images received a score of 5 were 48, 29, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems. When the proposed method is implemented in the clinical systems as an automatic image processing filter, it could be useful for allowing quicker and potentially more accurate treatment setup and facilitating the subsequent offline review and verification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5689921/ /pubmed/28875594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12172 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Qiu, Jianfeng Harold Li, H. Zhang, Tiezhi Ma, Fangfang Yang, Deshan Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
title | Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
title_full | Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
title_fullStr | Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
title_short | Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
title_sort | automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiujianfeng automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization AT haroldlih automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization AT zhangtiezhi automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization AT mafangfang automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization AT yangdeshan automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization |