Cargando…

Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization

PURPOSE: Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Jianfeng, Harold Li, H., Zhang, Tiezhi, Ma, Fangfang, Yang, Deshan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12172
_version_ 1783279486920294400
author Qiu, Jianfeng
Harold Li, H.
Zhang, Tiezhi
Ma, Fangfang
Yang, Deshan
author_facet Qiu, Jianfeng
Harold Li, H.
Zhang, Tiezhi
Ma, Fangfang
Yang, Deshan
author_sort Qiu, Jianfeng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. The goal was to provide tissue contrast optimized for each treatment site in order to support accurate patient daily treatment setup and the subsequent offline review. METHODS: The proposed method processes the 2D x‐ray images with an optimized image processing filter chain, which consists of a noise reduction filter and a high‐pass filter followed by a contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) filter. The most important innovation is to optimize the image processing parameters automatically to determine the required image contrast settings per disease site and imaging modality. Three major parameters controlling the image processing chain, i.e., the Gaussian smoothing weighting factor for the high‐pass filter, the block size, and the clip limiting parameter for the CLAHE filter, were determined automatically using an interior‐point constrained optimization algorithm. RESULTS: Fifty‐two kV and MV x‐ray images were included in this study. The results were manually evaluated and ranked with scores from 1 (worst, unacceptable) to 5 (significantly better than adequate and visually praise worthy) by physicians and physicists. The average scores for the images processed by the proposed method, the CLAHE, and the best window‐level adjustment were 3.92, 2.83, and 2.27, respectively. The percentage of the processed images received a score of 5 were 48, 29, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems. When the proposed method is implemented in the clinical systems as an automatic image processing filter, it could be useful for allowing quicker and potentially more accurate treatment setup and facilitating the subsequent offline review and verification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899212018-04-02 Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization Qiu, Jianfeng Harold Li, H. Zhang, Tiezhi Ma, Fangfang Yang, Deshan J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging PURPOSE: Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. The goal was to provide tissue contrast optimized for each treatment site in order to support accurate patient daily treatment setup and the subsequent offline review. METHODS: The proposed method processes the 2D x‐ray images with an optimized image processing filter chain, which consists of a noise reduction filter and a high‐pass filter followed by a contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) filter. The most important innovation is to optimize the image processing parameters automatically to determine the required image contrast settings per disease site and imaging modality. Three major parameters controlling the image processing chain, i.e., the Gaussian smoothing weighting factor for the high‐pass filter, the block size, and the clip limiting parameter for the CLAHE filter, were determined automatically using an interior‐point constrained optimization algorithm. RESULTS: Fifty‐two kV and MV x‐ray images were included in this study. The results were manually evaluated and ranked with scores from 1 (worst, unacceptable) to 5 (significantly better than adequate and visually praise worthy) by physicians and physicists. The average scores for the images processed by the proposed method, the CLAHE, and the best window‐level adjustment were 3.92, 2.83, and 2.27, respectively. The percentage of the processed images received a score of 5 were 48, 29, and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems. When the proposed method is implemented in the clinical systems as an automatic image processing filter, it could be useful for allowing quicker and potentially more accurate treatment setup and facilitating the subsequent offline review and verification. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5689921/ /pubmed/28875594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12172 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Qiu, Jianfeng
Harold Li, H.
Zhang, Tiezhi
Ma, Fangfang
Yang, Deshan
Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
title Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
title_full Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
title_fullStr Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
title_full_unstemmed Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
title_short Automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
title_sort automatic x‐ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto‐optimization
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28875594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12172
work_keys_str_mv AT qiujianfeng automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization
AT haroldlih automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization
AT zhangtiezhi automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization
AT mafangfang automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization
AT yangdeshan automaticxrayimagecontrastenhancementbasedonparameterautooptimization