Cargando…

Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms

The aim of this study is to measure the radiographic dose in adult, adolescent, and child head‐sized PMMA phantoms for three panoramic‐imaging devices: the panoramic mode on two CBCT machines (Carestream 9300 and i‐CAT NG) and the Planmeca ProMax 2D. A SEDENTEXCT dose index adult phantom and custom‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wahid, Muizz A., Choi, Ella, MacDonald, David S., Ford, Nancy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12059
_version_ 1783279493373231104
author Wahid, Muizz A.
Choi, Ella
MacDonald, David S.
Ford, Nancy L.
author_facet Wahid, Muizz A.
Choi, Ella
MacDonald, David S.
Ford, Nancy L.
author_sort Wahid, Muizz A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to measure the radiographic dose in adult, adolescent, and child head‐sized PMMA phantoms for three panoramic‐imaging devices: the panoramic mode on two CBCT machines (Carestream 9300 and i‐CAT NG) and the Planmeca ProMax 2D. A SEDENTEXCT dose index adult phantom and custom‐built adolescent and pediatric PMMA dosimetry phantoms were used. Panoramic radiographs were performed using a Planmeca ProMax 2D and the panoramic mode on a Carestream 9300 CBCT and an i‐CAT NG using the protocols used clinically. Point dose measurements were performed at the center, around the periphery and on the surface of each phantom using a thimble ionization chamber. Five repeat measurements were taken at each location. For each machine, single‐factor ANOVA was conducted to determine dose differences between protocols in each phantom, as well as determine the differences in absorbed dose when the same protocol was used for different‐sized phantoms. For any individual phantom, using protocols with lower kVp, mA, or acquisition times resulted in statistically significant dose savings, as expected. When the same protocol was used for different‐sized phantoms, the smaller phantom had a higher radiation dose due to less attenuation of x‐rays by the smaller phantom and differences in the positioning of the ion chamber relative to the focal trough. The panoramic‐mode on the CBCT machines produce images suitable for clinical use with similar dose levels to the stand‐alone panoramic device. Significant dose savings may result by selecting age‐ and size‐ appropriate protocols for pediatric patients, but a wider range of protocols for children and adolescents may be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899442018-04-02 Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms Wahid, Muizz A. Choi, Ella MacDonald, David S. Ford, Nancy L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements The aim of this study is to measure the radiographic dose in adult, adolescent, and child head‐sized PMMA phantoms for three panoramic‐imaging devices: the panoramic mode on two CBCT machines (Carestream 9300 and i‐CAT NG) and the Planmeca ProMax 2D. A SEDENTEXCT dose index adult phantom and custom‐built adolescent and pediatric PMMA dosimetry phantoms were used. Panoramic radiographs were performed using a Planmeca ProMax 2D and the panoramic mode on a Carestream 9300 CBCT and an i‐CAT NG using the protocols used clinically. Point dose measurements were performed at the center, around the periphery and on the surface of each phantom using a thimble ionization chamber. Five repeat measurements were taken at each location. For each machine, single‐factor ANOVA was conducted to determine dose differences between protocols in each phantom, as well as determine the differences in absorbed dose when the same protocol was used for different‐sized phantoms. For any individual phantom, using protocols with lower kVp, mA, or acquisition times resulted in statistically significant dose savings, as expected. When the same protocol was used for different‐sized phantoms, the smaller phantom had a higher radiation dose due to less attenuation of x‐rays by the smaller phantom and differences in the positioning of the ion chamber relative to the focal trough. The panoramic‐mode on the CBCT machines produce images suitable for clinical use with similar dose levels to the stand‐alone panoramic device. Significant dose savings may result by selecting age‐ and size‐ appropriate protocols for pediatric patients, but a wider range of protocols for children and adolescents may be beneficial. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5689944/ /pubmed/28300383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12059 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Wahid, Muizz A.
Choi, Ella
MacDonald, David S.
Ford, Nancy L.
Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
title Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
title_full Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
title_fullStr Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
title_short Dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
title_sort dosimetry analysis of panoramic‐imaging devices in different‐sized phantoms
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12059
work_keys_str_mv AT wahidmuizza dosimetryanalysisofpanoramicimagingdevicesindifferentsizedphantoms
AT choiella dosimetryanalysisofpanoramicimagingdevicesindifferentsizedphantoms
AT macdonalddavids dosimetryanalysisofpanoramicimagingdevicesindifferentsizedphantoms
AT fordnancyl dosimetryanalysisofpanoramicimagingdevicesindifferentsizedphantoms