Cargando…

Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range

This study aimed to investigate the energy dependence and the angular dependence of commercially available optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) point dosimeters in the mammography energy range. The energy dependence was evaluated to calculate calibration factors (CFs). The half‐value layer range...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawaguchi, Ai, Matsunaga, Yuta, Suzuki, Shoichi, Chida, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12041
_version_ 1783279495131693056
author Kawaguchi, Ai
Matsunaga, Yuta
Suzuki, Shoichi
Chida, Koichi
author_facet Kawaguchi, Ai
Matsunaga, Yuta
Suzuki, Shoichi
Chida, Koichi
author_sort Kawaguchi, Ai
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the energy dependence and the angular dependence of commercially available optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) point dosimeters in the mammography energy range. The energy dependence was evaluated to calculate calibration factors (CFs). The half‐value layer range was 0.31–0.60 mmAl (Mo/Mo 22–28 kV, Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, and W/Rh 30–34 kV at 2‐kV intervals). Mo/Rh 28 kV was the reference condition. Angular dependence was tested by rotating the X‐ray tube from −90° to 90° in 30° increments, and signal counts from angled nanoDots were normalized to the 0° signal counts. Angular dependence was compared with three tube voltage and target/filter combinations (Mo/Mo 26 kV, Mo/Rh 28 kV and W/Rh 32 kV). The CFs of energy dependence were 0.94–1.06. In Mo/Mo 26–28 kV and Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, the range of CF was 0.99–1.01, which was very similar. For angular dependence, the most deteriorated normalized values (Mo/Mo, 0.37; Mo/Rh, 0.43; and W/Rh, 0.58) were observed when the X‐ray tube was rotated at a 90° angle, compared to 0°. The most angular dependences of ± 30°, 60°, and 90° decreased by approximately 4%, 14%, and 63% respectively. The mean deteriorated measurement 30° intervals from 0° to ± 30° was 2%, from ± 30° to ± 60° was 8%, and from ± 60° to ± 90° was 40%. The range of energy dependence in typical mammography energy range was not as much as that in general radiography and computed tomography. For accurate measurement using nanoDot, the tilt needs to be under 30°.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899522018-04-02 Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range Kawaguchi, Ai Matsunaga, Yuta Suzuki, Shoichi Chida, Koichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements This study aimed to investigate the energy dependence and the angular dependence of commercially available optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) point dosimeters in the mammography energy range. The energy dependence was evaluated to calculate calibration factors (CFs). The half‐value layer range was 0.31–0.60 mmAl (Mo/Mo 22–28 kV, Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, and W/Rh 30–34 kV at 2‐kV intervals). Mo/Rh 28 kV was the reference condition. Angular dependence was tested by rotating the X‐ray tube from −90° to 90° in 30° increments, and signal counts from angled nanoDots were normalized to the 0° signal counts. Angular dependence was compared with three tube voltage and target/filter combinations (Mo/Mo 26 kV, Mo/Rh 28 kV and W/Rh 32 kV). The CFs of energy dependence were 0.94–1.06. In Mo/Mo 26–28 kV and Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, the range of CF was 0.99–1.01, which was very similar. For angular dependence, the most deteriorated normalized values (Mo/Mo, 0.37; Mo/Rh, 0.43; and W/Rh, 0.58) were observed when the X‐ray tube was rotated at a 90° angle, compared to 0°. The most angular dependences of ± 30°, 60°, and 90° decreased by approximately 4%, 14%, and 63% respectively. The mean deteriorated measurement 30° intervals from 0° to ± 30° was 2%, from ± 30° to ± 60° was 8%, and from ± 60° to ± 90° was 40%. The range of energy dependence in typical mammography energy range was not as much as that in general radiography and computed tomography. For accurate measurement using nanoDot, the tilt needs to be under 30°. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5689952/ /pubmed/28300371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12041 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Kawaguchi, Ai
Matsunaga, Yuta
Suzuki, Shoichi
Chida, Koichi
Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
title Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
title_full Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
title_fullStr Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
title_full_unstemmed Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
title_short Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
title_sort energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12041
work_keys_str_mv AT kawaguchiai energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange
AT matsunagayuta energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange
AT suzukishoichi energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange
AT chidakoichi energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange