Cargando…
Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range
This study aimed to investigate the energy dependence and the angular dependence of commercially available optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) point dosimeters in the mammography energy range. The energy dependence was evaluated to calculate calibration factors (CFs). The half‐value layer range...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12041 |
_version_ | 1783279495131693056 |
---|---|
author | Kawaguchi, Ai Matsunaga, Yuta Suzuki, Shoichi Chida, Koichi |
author_facet | Kawaguchi, Ai Matsunaga, Yuta Suzuki, Shoichi Chida, Koichi |
author_sort | Kawaguchi, Ai |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the energy dependence and the angular dependence of commercially available optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) point dosimeters in the mammography energy range. The energy dependence was evaluated to calculate calibration factors (CFs). The half‐value layer range was 0.31–0.60 mmAl (Mo/Mo 22–28 kV, Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, and W/Rh 30–34 kV at 2‐kV intervals). Mo/Rh 28 kV was the reference condition. Angular dependence was tested by rotating the X‐ray tube from −90° to 90° in 30° increments, and signal counts from angled nanoDots were normalized to the 0° signal counts. Angular dependence was compared with three tube voltage and target/filter combinations (Mo/Mo 26 kV, Mo/Rh 28 kV and W/Rh 32 kV). The CFs of energy dependence were 0.94–1.06. In Mo/Mo 26–28 kV and Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, the range of CF was 0.99–1.01, which was very similar. For angular dependence, the most deteriorated normalized values (Mo/Mo, 0.37; Mo/Rh, 0.43; and W/Rh, 0.58) were observed when the X‐ray tube was rotated at a 90° angle, compared to 0°. The most angular dependences of ± 30°, 60°, and 90° decreased by approximately 4%, 14%, and 63% respectively. The mean deteriorated measurement 30° intervals from 0° to ± 30° was 2%, from ± 30° to ± 60° was 8%, and from ± 60° to ± 90° was 40%. The range of energy dependence in typical mammography energy range was not as much as that in general radiography and computed tomography. For accurate measurement using nanoDot, the tilt needs to be under 30°. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56899522018-04-02 Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range Kawaguchi, Ai Matsunaga, Yuta Suzuki, Shoichi Chida, Koichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements This study aimed to investigate the energy dependence and the angular dependence of commercially available optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) point dosimeters in the mammography energy range. The energy dependence was evaluated to calculate calibration factors (CFs). The half‐value layer range was 0.31–0.60 mmAl (Mo/Mo 22–28 kV, Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, and W/Rh 30–34 kV at 2‐kV intervals). Mo/Rh 28 kV was the reference condition. Angular dependence was tested by rotating the X‐ray tube from −90° to 90° in 30° increments, and signal counts from angled nanoDots were normalized to the 0° signal counts. Angular dependence was compared with three tube voltage and target/filter combinations (Mo/Mo 26 kV, Mo/Rh 28 kV and W/Rh 32 kV). The CFs of energy dependence were 0.94–1.06. In Mo/Mo 26–28 kV and Mo/Rh 28–32 kV, the range of CF was 0.99–1.01, which was very similar. For angular dependence, the most deteriorated normalized values (Mo/Mo, 0.37; Mo/Rh, 0.43; and W/Rh, 0.58) were observed when the X‐ray tube was rotated at a 90° angle, compared to 0°. The most angular dependences of ± 30°, 60°, and 90° decreased by approximately 4%, 14%, and 63% respectively. The mean deteriorated measurement 30° intervals from 0° to ± 30° was 2%, from ± 30° to ± 60° was 8%, and from ± 60° to ± 90° was 40%. The range of energy dependence in typical mammography energy range was not as much as that in general radiography and computed tomography. For accurate measurement using nanoDot, the tilt needs to be under 30°. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5689952/ /pubmed/28300371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12041 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Measurements Kawaguchi, Ai Matsunaga, Yuta Suzuki, Shoichi Chida, Koichi Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
title | Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
title_full | Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
title_fullStr | Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
title_full_unstemmed | Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
title_short | Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
title_sort | energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range |
topic | Radiation Measurements |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawaguchiai energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange AT matsunagayuta energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange AT suzukishoichi energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange AT chidakoichi energydependenceandangulardependenceofanopticallystimulatedluminescencedosimeterinthemammographyenergyrange |