Cargando…

Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods

AlignRT is a surface imaging system that has been utilized for localizing and tracking patient position during radiotherapy. AlignRT has two calibration procedures that can set the system's isocenter called “Monthly Calibration” (MC) and “Isocentre Calibration” (IC). The MC utilizes a calibrati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paxton, Adam B., Manger, Ryan P., Pawlicki, Todd, Kim, Gwe‐Ya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12054
_version_ 1783279496725528576
author Paxton, Adam B.
Manger, Ryan P.
Pawlicki, Todd
Kim, Gwe‐Ya
author_facet Paxton, Adam B.
Manger, Ryan P.
Pawlicki, Todd
Kim, Gwe‐Ya
author_sort Paxton, Adam B.
collection PubMed
description AlignRT is a surface imaging system that has been utilized for localizing and tracking patient position during radiotherapy. AlignRT has two calibration procedures that can set the system's isocenter called “Monthly Calibration” (MC) and “Isocentre Calibration” (IC). The MC utilizes a calibration plate. In addition to the calibration plate, the IC utilizes a cubic phantom that is imaged with the linac treatment beam to aid in aligning the AlignRT and treatment‐beam isocenters. This work evaluated the effects of misaligning the calibration plate during the calibration process. The plate was intentionally shifted away from isocenter ±3.0 mm in the longitudinal and lateral directions and ±1.0 mm in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions. A mock stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment was used to evaluate the effects of the miscalibrations. An anthropomorphic head phantom was placed in an SRS treatment position and monitored with the AlignRT system. The AlignRT‐indicated offsets were recorded at 270°, 315°, 0°, 45°, and 90° couch angles for each intentional misalignment of the calibration plate during the MC. The IC was also performed after each miscalibration, and the measurements were repeated and compared to the previous results. With intentional longitudinal and lateral shifts of ±3.0 mm and ±1.0 mm of the calibration plate, the average indicated offsets at couch rotations of ±90° were 4.3 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. This was in agreement with the theoretical offset of √2*(shift‐of‐the‐calibration plate). Since vertical shifts were along the rotation axis of the couch, these shifts had little effect on the offsets with changing couch angle. When the IC was applied, the indicated offsets were all within 0.5 mm for all couch angles for each of the miscalibrations. These offsets were in agreement with the known magnitude of couch walkout. The IC method effectively removes the potential miscalibration artifacts of the MC method due to misalignments of the calibration plate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899592018-04-02 Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods Paxton, Adam B. Manger, Ryan P. Pawlicki, Todd Kim, Gwe‐Ya J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics AlignRT is a surface imaging system that has been utilized for localizing and tracking patient position during radiotherapy. AlignRT has two calibration procedures that can set the system's isocenter called “Monthly Calibration” (MC) and “Isocentre Calibration” (IC). The MC utilizes a calibration plate. In addition to the calibration plate, the IC utilizes a cubic phantom that is imaged with the linac treatment beam to aid in aligning the AlignRT and treatment‐beam isocenters. This work evaluated the effects of misaligning the calibration plate during the calibration process. The plate was intentionally shifted away from isocenter ±3.0 mm in the longitudinal and lateral directions and ±1.0 mm in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions. A mock stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment was used to evaluate the effects of the miscalibrations. An anthropomorphic head phantom was placed in an SRS treatment position and monitored with the AlignRT system. The AlignRT‐indicated offsets were recorded at 270°, 315°, 0°, 45°, and 90° couch angles for each intentional misalignment of the calibration plate during the MC. The IC was also performed after each miscalibration, and the measurements were repeated and compared to the previous results. With intentional longitudinal and lateral shifts of ±3.0 mm and ±1.0 mm of the calibration plate, the average indicated offsets at couch rotations of ±90° were 4.3 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. This was in agreement with the theoretical offset of √2*(shift‐of‐the‐calibration plate). Since vertical shifts were along the rotation axis of the couch, these shifts had little effect on the offsets with changing couch angle. When the IC was applied, the indicated offsets were all within 0.5 mm for all couch angles for each of the miscalibrations. These offsets were in agreement with the known magnitude of couch walkout. The IC method effectively removes the potential miscalibration artifacts of the MC method due to misalignments of the calibration plate. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5689959/ /pubmed/28300386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12054 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Paxton, Adam B.
Manger, Ryan P.
Pawlicki, Todd
Kim, Gwe‐Ya
Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
title Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
title_full Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
title_fullStr Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
title_short Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
title_sort evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28300386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12054
work_keys_str_mv AT paxtonadamb evaluationofasurfaceimagingsystemsisocentercalibrationmethods
AT mangerryanp evaluationofasurfaceimagingsystemsisocentercalibrationmethods
AT pawlickitodd evaluationofasurfaceimagingsystemsisocentercalibrationmethods
AT kimgweya evaluationofasurfaceimagingsystemsisocentercalibrationmethods