Cargando…

Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy

A formal communication process was established and evaluated for the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) receiving radiation therapy (RT). Methods to estimate dose to the CIED were evaluated for their appropriateness in the management of these patients. A retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prisciandaro, Joann I., Makkar, Akash, Fox, Colleen J., Hayman, James A., Horwood, Laura, Pelosi, Frank, Moran, Jean M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5189
_version_ 1783279503726870528
author Prisciandaro, Joann I.
Makkar, Akash
Fox, Colleen J.
Hayman, James A.
Horwood, Laura
Pelosi, Frank
Moran, Jean M.
author_facet Prisciandaro, Joann I.
Makkar, Akash
Fox, Colleen J.
Hayman, James A.
Horwood, Laura
Pelosi, Frank
Moran, Jean M.
author_sort Prisciandaro, Joann I.
collection PubMed
description A formal communication process was established and evaluated for the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) receiving radiation therapy (RT). Methods to estimate dose to the CIED were evaluated for their appropriateness in the management of these patients. A retrospective, institutional review board (IRB) approved study of 69 patients with CIEDs treated with RT between 2005 and 2011 was performed. The treatment sites, techniques, and the estimated doses to the CIEDs were analyzed and compared to estimates from published peripheral dose (PD) data and three treatment planning systems (TPSs) — UMPlan, Eclipse's AAA and Acuros algorithms. When measurements were indicated, radiation doses to the CIEDs ranged from 0.01–5.06 Gy. Total peripheral dose estimates based on publications differed from TLD measurements by an average of 0.94 Gy (0.05–4.49 Gy) and 0.51 Gy (0–2.74 Gy) for CIEDs within 2.5 cm and between 2.5 and 10 cm of the treatment field edge, respectively. Total peripheral dose estimates based on three TPSs differed from measurements by an average of 0.69 Gy (0.02–3.72 Gy) for CIEDs within 2.5 cm of the field edge. Of the 69 patients evaluated in this study, only two with defibrillators experienced a partial reset of their device during treatment. Based on this study, few CIED‐related events were observed during RT. The only noted correlation with treatment parameters for these two events was beam energy, as both patients were treated with high‐energy photon beams (16 MV). Differences in estimated and measured CIED doses were observed when using published PD data and TPS calculations. As such, we continue to follow conservative guidelines and measure CIED doses when the device is within 10 cm of the field or the estimated dose is greater than 2 Gy for pacemakers or 1 Gy for defibrillators. PACS number: 87.55.N‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899882018-04-02 Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy Prisciandaro, Joann I. Makkar, Akash Fox, Colleen J. Hayman, James A. Horwood, Laura Pelosi, Frank Moran, Jean M. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A formal communication process was established and evaluated for the management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) receiving radiation therapy (RT). Methods to estimate dose to the CIED were evaluated for their appropriateness in the management of these patients. A retrospective, institutional review board (IRB) approved study of 69 patients with CIEDs treated with RT between 2005 and 2011 was performed. The treatment sites, techniques, and the estimated doses to the CIEDs were analyzed and compared to estimates from published peripheral dose (PD) data and three treatment planning systems (TPSs) — UMPlan, Eclipse's AAA and Acuros algorithms. When measurements were indicated, radiation doses to the CIEDs ranged from 0.01–5.06 Gy. Total peripheral dose estimates based on publications differed from TLD measurements by an average of 0.94 Gy (0.05–4.49 Gy) and 0.51 Gy (0–2.74 Gy) for CIEDs within 2.5 cm and between 2.5 and 10 cm of the treatment field edge, respectively. Total peripheral dose estimates based on three TPSs differed from measurements by an average of 0.69 Gy (0.02–3.72 Gy) for CIEDs within 2.5 cm of the field edge. Of the 69 patients evaluated in this study, only two with defibrillators experienced a partial reset of their device during treatment. Based on this study, few CIED‐related events were observed during RT. The only noted correlation with treatment parameters for these two events was beam energy, as both patients were treated with high‐energy photon beams (16 MV). Differences in estimated and measured CIED doses were observed when using published PD data and TPS calculations. As such, we continue to follow conservative guidelines and measure CIED doses when the device is within 10 cm of the field or the estimated dose is greater than 2 Gy for pacemakers or 1 Gy for defibrillators. PACS number: 87.55.N‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5689988/ /pubmed/25679176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5189 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Prisciandaro, Joann I.
Makkar, Akash
Fox, Colleen J.
Hayman, James A.
Horwood, Laura
Pelosi, Frank
Moran, Jean M.
Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
title Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
title_full Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
title_short Dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
title_sort dosimetric review of cardiac implantable electronic device patients receiving radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5189
work_keys_str_mv AT prisciandarojoanni dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy
AT makkarakash dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy
AT foxcolleenj dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy
AT haymanjamesa dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy
AT horwoodlaura dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy
AT pelosifrank dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy
AT moranjeanm dosimetricreviewofcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicepatientsreceivingradiotherapy