Cargando…
Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy
Image‐guided position verification in breast radiotherapy is accurately performed with kilovoltage cone beam CT (kV‐CBCT). The technique is, however, time‐consuming and there is a risk for patient collision. Online position verification performed with orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.4796 |
_version_ | 1783279504455630848 |
---|---|
author | Petillion, Saskia Verhoeven, Karolien Weltens, Caroline Van den Heuvel, Frank |
author_facet | Petillion, Saskia Verhoeven, Karolien Weltens, Caroline Van den Heuvel, Frank |
author_sort | Petillion, Saskia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Image‐guided position verification in breast radiotherapy is accurately performed with kilovoltage cone beam CT (kV‐CBCT). The technique is, however, time‐consuming and there is a risk for patient collision. Online position verification performed with orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging is less time‐consuming at the expense of inferior accuracy compared to kV‐CBCT. We therefore investigated whether a new tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging technique can reduce the residual error (RE) of orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging. The latter was applied to 20 breast cancer patients. Tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging was investigated in 20 breast and 20 breast cancer patients with locoregional lymph node irradiation. The central lung distance (CLD) residual error and the longitudinal residual error were determined during the first 5 treatment fractions. Off‐line matching of the tangential breast field images, acquired after online position correction, was used. The mean, systematic, and random REs of each patient group were calculated. The systematic REs were checked for significant differences using the F‐test. Tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging significantly reduced the systematic CLD residual error of orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging for the breast cancer patients, from 2.3 mm to 1.0 mm, and also significantly decreased the systematic longitudinal RE from 2.4 mm to 1.3 mm. PTV margins, which account for the residual error [Formula: see text] , were also calculated. The [Formula: see text] margin needed to account for the RE of orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging (i.e., 8 mm) was halved by tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging. The differences between the systematic REs of tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging of the breast cancer patients and the breast cancer patients with locoregional lymph node irradiation were not significant, yielding comparable [Formula: see text] margins. In this study, we showed that tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging is superior to orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging to correct the position errors in whole breast radiotherapy. PACS numbers: 87.57N‐, 87.56Da, 87.53Kn |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56899912018-04-02 Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy Petillion, Saskia Verhoeven, Karolien Weltens, Caroline Van den Heuvel, Frank J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Image‐guided position verification in breast radiotherapy is accurately performed with kilovoltage cone beam CT (kV‐CBCT). The technique is, however, time‐consuming and there is a risk for patient collision. Online position verification performed with orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging is less time‐consuming at the expense of inferior accuracy compared to kV‐CBCT. We therefore investigated whether a new tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging technique can reduce the residual error (RE) of orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging. The latter was applied to 20 breast cancer patients. Tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging was investigated in 20 breast and 20 breast cancer patients with locoregional lymph node irradiation. The central lung distance (CLD) residual error and the longitudinal residual error were determined during the first 5 treatment fractions. Off‐line matching of the tangential breast field images, acquired after online position correction, was used. The mean, systematic, and random REs of each patient group were calculated. The systematic REs were checked for significant differences using the F‐test. Tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging significantly reduced the systematic CLD residual error of orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging for the breast cancer patients, from 2.3 mm to 1.0 mm, and also significantly decreased the systematic longitudinal RE from 2.4 mm to 1.3 mm. PTV margins, which account for the residual error [Formula: see text] , were also calculated. The [Formula: see text] margin needed to account for the RE of orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging (i.e., 8 mm) was halved by tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging. The differences between the systematic REs of tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging of the breast cancer patients and the breast cancer patients with locoregional lymph node irradiation were not significant, yielding comparable [Formula: see text] margins. In this study, we showed that tangential‐angled single modality paired imaging is superior to orthogonal‐angled mixed modality paired imaging to correct the position errors in whole breast radiotherapy. PACS numbers: 87.57N‐, 87.56Da, 87.53Kn John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5689991/ /pubmed/25679154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.4796 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Petillion, Saskia Verhoeven, Karolien Weltens, Caroline Van den Heuvel, Frank Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
title | Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
title_full | Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
title_short | Accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
title_sort | accuracy of a new paired imaging technique for position correction in whole breast radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.4796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petillionsaskia accuracyofanewpairedimagingtechniqueforpositioncorrectioninwholebreastradiotherapy AT verhoevenkarolien accuracyofanewpairedimagingtechniqueforpositioncorrectioninwholebreastradiotherapy AT weltenscaroline accuracyofanewpairedimagingtechniqueforpositioncorrectioninwholebreastradiotherapy AT vandenheuvelfrank accuracyofanewpairedimagingtechniqueforpositioncorrectioninwholebreastradiotherapy |