Cargando…

Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging

For accurate delivery of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the gantry position should be synchronized with the multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions and the dose rate. This study, therefore, aims to implement quality control (QC) of VMAT synchronization, with as few arcs as possible and w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bedford, James L., Chajecka‐Szczygielska, Honorata, Thomas, Michael D. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5238
_version_ 1783279504928538624
author Bedford, James L.
Chajecka‐Szczygielska, Honorata
Thomas, Michael D. R.
author_facet Bedford, James L.
Chajecka‐Szczygielska, Honorata
Thomas, Michael D. R.
author_sort Bedford, James L.
collection PubMed
description For accurate delivery of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the gantry position should be synchronized with the multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions and the dose rate. This study, therefore, aims to implement quality control (QC) of VMAT synchronization, with as few arcs as possible and with minimal data handling time, using portal imaging. A steel bar of diameter 12 mm is accurately positioned in the G–T direction, 80 mm laterally from the isocenter. An arc prescription irradiates the bar with a [Formula: see text] field during a complete 360° arc, so as to cast a shadow of the bar onto the portal imager. This results in a sinusoidal sweep of the field and shadow across the portal imager and back. The method is evaluated by simulating gantry position errors of 1°–9° at one control point, dose errors of 2 monitor units to 20 monitor units (MU) at one control point (0.3%–3% overall), and MLC leaf position errors of 1 mm ‐ 6 mm at one control point. Inhomogeneity metrics are defined to characterize the synchronization of all leaves and of individual leaves with respect to the complete set. Typical behavior is also investigated for three models of accelerator. In the absence of simulated errors, the integrated images show uniformity, and with simulated delivery errors, irregular patterns appear. The inhomogeneity metrics increase by 67% due to a 4° gantry position error, 33% due to an 8 MU (1.25%) dose error, and 70% due to a 2 mm MLC leaf position error. The method is more sensitive to errors at gantry angle 90°/270° than at 0°/180° due to the geometry of the test. This method provides fast and effective VMAT QC suitable for inclusion in a monthly accelerator QC program. The test is able to detect errors in the delivery of individual control points, with the possibility of using movie images to further investigate suspicious image features. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899942018-04-02 Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging Bedford, James L. Chajecka‐Szczygielska, Honorata Thomas, Michael D. R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics For accurate delivery of volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the gantry position should be synchronized with the multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions and the dose rate. This study, therefore, aims to implement quality control (QC) of VMAT synchronization, with as few arcs as possible and with minimal data handling time, using portal imaging. A steel bar of diameter 12 mm is accurately positioned in the G–T direction, 80 mm laterally from the isocenter. An arc prescription irradiates the bar with a [Formula: see text] field during a complete 360° arc, so as to cast a shadow of the bar onto the portal imager. This results in a sinusoidal sweep of the field and shadow across the portal imager and back. The method is evaluated by simulating gantry position errors of 1°–9° at one control point, dose errors of 2 monitor units to 20 monitor units (MU) at one control point (0.3%–3% overall), and MLC leaf position errors of 1 mm ‐ 6 mm at one control point. Inhomogeneity metrics are defined to characterize the synchronization of all leaves and of individual leaves with respect to the complete set. Typical behavior is also investigated for three models of accelerator. In the absence of simulated errors, the integrated images show uniformity, and with simulated delivery errors, irregular patterns appear. The inhomogeneity metrics increase by 67% due to a 4° gantry position error, 33% due to an 8 MU (1.25%) dose error, and 70% due to a 2 mm MLC leaf position error. The method is more sensitive to errors at gantry angle 90°/270° than at 0°/180° due to the geometry of the test. This method provides fast and effective VMAT QC suitable for inclusion in a monthly accelerator QC program. The test is able to detect errors in the delivery of individual control points, with the possibility of using movie images to further investigate suspicious image features. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5689994/ /pubmed/25679179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5238 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Bedford, James L.
Chajecka‐Szczygielska, Honorata
Thomas, Michael D. R.
Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging
title Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging
title_full Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging
title_fullStr Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging
title_full_unstemmed Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging
title_short Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging
title_sort quality control of vmat synchronization using portal imaging
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5238
work_keys_str_mv AT bedfordjamesl qualitycontrolofvmatsynchronizationusingportalimaging
AT chajeckaszczygielskahonorata qualitycontrolofvmatsynchronizationusingportalimaging
AT thomasmichaeldr qualitycontrolofvmatsynchronizationusingportalimaging