Cargando…

Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation

In this study, we evaluated the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system, COMPASS version 3, which has a dedicated beam models and dose calculation engine. It was possible to reconstruct the 3D dose distributions in patient anatomy based on the measured fluence using the Matr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakaguchi, Yuji, Ono, Takeshi, Maruyama, Masato, Nagasue, Nozomu, Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu, Kai, Yudai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5199
_version_ 1783279506122866688
author Nakaguchi, Yuji
Ono, Takeshi
Maruyama, Masato
Nagasue, Nozomu
Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
Kai, Yudai
author_facet Nakaguchi, Yuji
Ono, Takeshi
Maruyama, Masato
Nagasue, Nozomu
Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
Kai, Yudai
author_sort Nakaguchi, Yuji
collection PubMed
description In this study, we evaluated the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system, COMPASS version 3, which has a dedicated beam models and dose calculation engine. It was possible to reconstruct the 3D dose distributions in patient anatomy based on the measured fluence using the MatriXX 2D array. The COMPASS system was compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MC), glass rod dosimeter (GRD), and 3DVH, using an anthropomorphic phantom for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification in clinical neck cases. The GRD measurements agreed with the MC within 5% at most measurement points. In addition, most points for COMPASS and 3DVH also agreed with the MC within 5%. The COMPASS system showed better results than 3DVH for dose profiles due to individual adjustments, such as beam modeling for each linac. Regarding the dose‐volume histograms, there were no large differences between MC, analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), 3DVH, and the COMPASS system. However, AAA underestimated the dose to the clinical target volume and Rt‐Parotid slightly. This is because AAA has some problems with dose calculation accuracy. Our results indicated that the COMPASS system offers highly accurate 3D dose calculation for clinical IMRT quality assurance. Also, the COMPASS system will be useful as a commissioning tool in routine clinical practice for TPS. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.61.Bj
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5689999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56899992018-04-02 Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation Nakaguchi, Yuji Ono, Takeshi Maruyama, Masato Nagasue, Nozomu Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Kai, Yudai J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In this study, we evaluated the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system, COMPASS version 3, which has a dedicated beam models and dose calculation engine. It was possible to reconstruct the 3D dose distributions in patient anatomy based on the measured fluence using the MatriXX 2D array. The COMPASS system was compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MC), glass rod dosimeter (GRD), and 3DVH, using an anthropomorphic phantom for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification in clinical neck cases. The GRD measurements agreed with the MC within 5% at most measurement points. In addition, most points for COMPASS and 3DVH also agreed with the MC within 5%. The COMPASS system showed better results than 3DVH for dose profiles due to individual adjustments, such as beam modeling for each linac. Regarding the dose‐volume histograms, there were no large differences between MC, analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), 3DVH, and the COMPASS system. However, AAA underestimated the dose to the clinical target volume and Rt‐Parotid slightly. This is because AAA has some problems with dose calculation accuracy. Our results indicated that the COMPASS system offers highly accurate 3D dose calculation for clinical IMRT quality assurance. Also, the COMPASS system will be useful as a commissioning tool in routine clinical practice for TPS. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.61.Bj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5689999/ /pubmed/25679177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5199 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Nakaguchi, Yuji
Ono, Takeshi
Maruyama, Masato
Nagasue, Nozomu
Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu
Kai, Yudai
Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
title Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
title_full Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
title_fullStr Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
title_full_unstemmed Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
title_short Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
title_sort validation of fluence‐based 3d imrt dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using monte carlo simulation
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5199
work_keys_str_mv AT nakaguchiyuji validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation
AT onotakeshi validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation
AT maruyamamasato validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation
AT nagasuenozomu validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation
AT shimohigashiyoshinobu validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation
AT kaiyudai validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation