Cargando…
Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation
In this study, we evaluated the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system, COMPASS version 3, which has a dedicated beam models and dose calculation engine. It was possible to reconstruct the 3D dose distributions in patient anatomy based on the measured fluence using the Matr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5199 |
_version_ | 1783279506122866688 |
---|---|
author | Nakaguchi, Yuji Ono, Takeshi Maruyama, Masato Nagasue, Nozomu Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Kai, Yudai |
author_facet | Nakaguchi, Yuji Ono, Takeshi Maruyama, Masato Nagasue, Nozomu Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Kai, Yudai |
author_sort | Nakaguchi, Yuji |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we evaluated the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system, COMPASS version 3, which has a dedicated beam models and dose calculation engine. It was possible to reconstruct the 3D dose distributions in patient anatomy based on the measured fluence using the MatriXX 2D array. The COMPASS system was compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MC), glass rod dosimeter (GRD), and 3DVH, using an anthropomorphic phantom for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification in clinical neck cases. The GRD measurements agreed with the MC within 5% at most measurement points. In addition, most points for COMPASS and 3DVH also agreed with the MC within 5%. The COMPASS system showed better results than 3DVH for dose profiles due to individual adjustments, such as beam modeling for each linac. Regarding the dose‐volume histograms, there were no large differences between MC, analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), 3DVH, and the COMPASS system. However, AAA underestimated the dose to the clinical target volume and Rt‐Parotid slightly. This is because AAA has some problems with dose calculation accuracy. Our results indicated that the COMPASS system offers highly accurate 3D dose calculation for clinical IMRT quality assurance. Also, the COMPASS system will be useful as a commissioning tool in routine clinical practice for TPS. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.61.Bj |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5689999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56899992018-04-02 Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation Nakaguchi, Yuji Ono, Takeshi Maruyama, Masato Nagasue, Nozomu Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Kai, Yudai J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In this study, we evaluated the performance of a three‐dimensional (3D) dose verification system, COMPASS version 3, which has a dedicated beam models and dose calculation engine. It was possible to reconstruct the 3D dose distributions in patient anatomy based on the measured fluence using the MatriXX 2D array. The COMPASS system was compared with Monte Carlo simulation (MC), glass rod dosimeter (GRD), and 3DVH, using an anthropomorphic phantom for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose verification in clinical neck cases. The GRD measurements agreed with the MC within 5% at most measurement points. In addition, most points for COMPASS and 3DVH also agreed with the MC within 5%. The COMPASS system showed better results than 3DVH for dose profiles due to individual adjustments, such as beam modeling for each linac. Regarding the dose‐volume histograms, there were no large differences between MC, analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), 3DVH, and the COMPASS system. However, AAA underestimated the dose to the clinical target volume and Rt‐Parotid slightly. This is because AAA has some problems with dose calculation accuracy. Our results indicated that the COMPASS system offers highly accurate 3D dose calculation for clinical IMRT quality assurance. Also, the COMPASS system will be useful as a commissioning tool in routine clinical practice for TPS. PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.61.Bj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5689999/ /pubmed/25679177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5199 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Nakaguchi, Yuji Ono, Takeshi Maruyama, Masato Nagasue, Nozomu Shimohigashi, Yoshinobu Kai, Yudai Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation |
title | Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation |
title_full | Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation |
title_fullStr | Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation |
title_short | Validation of fluence‐based 3D IMRT dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using Monte Carlo simulation |
title_sort | validation of fluence‐based 3d imrt dose reconstruction on a heterogeneous anthropomorphic phantom using monte carlo simulation |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakaguchiyuji validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation AT onotakeshi validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation AT maruyamamasato validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation AT nagasuenozomu validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation AT shimohigashiyoshinobu validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation AT kaiyudai validationoffluencebased3dimrtdosereconstructiononaheterogeneousanthropomorphicphantomusingmontecarlosimulation |