Cargando…

A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography

In this study, the relationship between ground‐glass opacity (GGO) visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening was investigated. An anthropomorphic chest phantom that included synthetic GGOs with CT numbers of [Formula: see text] Houns...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ichikawa, Katsuhiro, Kobayashi, Takeshi, Sagawa, Motoyasu, Katagiri, Ayako, Uno, Yukiko, Nishioka, Ryo, Matsuyama, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5001
_version_ 1783279507547881472
author Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
Kobayashi, Takeshi
Sagawa, Motoyasu
Katagiri, Ayako
Uno, Yukiko
Nishioka, Ryo
Matsuyama, Jun
author_facet Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
Kobayashi, Takeshi
Sagawa, Motoyasu
Katagiri, Ayako
Uno, Yukiko
Nishioka, Ryo
Matsuyama, Jun
author_sort Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
collection PubMed
description In this study, the relationship between ground‐glass opacity (GGO) visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening was investigated. An anthropomorphic chest phantom that included synthetic GGOs with CT numbers of [Formula: see text] Hounsfield units (HU; high attenuation GGO: HGGO) and [Formula: see text] HU (low attenuation GGO: LGGO), and three phantoms for physical measurements were employed. The phantoms were scanned using 12 CT systems located in 11 screening centers in Japan. The slice thicknesses and CT dose indices ([Formula: see text]) varied over 1.0–5.0 mm and 0.85–3.30 mGy, respectively, and several reconstruction kernels were used. Physical detectability index values were calculated from measurements of resolution, noise, and slice thickness properties for all image sets. Five radiologists and one thoracic surgeon, blind to one another's observations, evaluated GGO visibility using a five‐point scoring system. The physical detectability index correlated reasonably well with the GGO visibility ([Formula: see text] for 6 mm HGGO and [Formula: see text] for 10 mm LGGO), and was nearly proportional to the CTDI(vol). Consequently, the [Formula: see text] also correlated reasonably well with the GGO visibility ([Formula: see text] for 6 mm HGGO and [Formula: see text] for 10 mm LGGO). As a result, the [Formula: see text] was nearly dominant in the GGO visibility for image sets with different reconstruction kernels and slice thicknesses, used in this study. PACS numbers: 81.70.Tx, 87.57.Q‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900052018-04-02 A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography Ichikawa, Katsuhiro Kobayashi, Takeshi Sagawa, Motoyasu Katagiri, Ayako Uno, Yukiko Nishioka, Ryo Matsuyama, Jun J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging In this study, the relationship between ground‐glass opacity (GGO) visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening was investigated. An anthropomorphic chest phantom that included synthetic GGOs with CT numbers of [Formula: see text] Hounsfield units (HU; high attenuation GGO: HGGO) and [Formula: see text] HU (low attenuation GGO: LGGO), and three phantoms for physical measurements were employed. The phantoms were scanned using 12 CT systems located in 11 screening centers in Japan. The slice thicknesses and CT dose indices ([Formula: see text]) varied over 1.0–5.0 mm and 0.85–3.30 mGy, respectively, and several reconstruction kernels were used. Physical detectability index values were calculated from measurements of resolution, noise, and slice thickness properties for all image sets. Five radiologists and one thoracic surgeon, blind to one another's observations, evaluated GGO visibility using a five‐point scoring system. The physical detectability index correlated reasonably well with the GGO visibility ([Formula: see text] for 6 mm HGGO and [Formula: see text] for 10 mm LGGO), and was nearly proportional to the CTDI(vol). Consequently, the [Formula: see text] also correlated reasonably well with the GGO visibility ([Formula: see text] for 6 mm HGGO and [Formula: see text] for 10 mm LGGO). As a result, the [Formula: see text] was nearly dominant in the GGO visibility for image sets with different reconstruction kernels and slice thicknesses, used in this study. PACS numbers: 81.70.Tx, 87.57.Q‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690005/ /pubmed/26218991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5001 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
Kobayashi, Takeshi
Sagawa, Motoyasu
Katagiri, Ayako
Uno, Yukiko
Nishioka, Ryo
Matsuyama, Jun
A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
title A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
title_full A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
title_fullStr A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
title_short A phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
title_sort phantom study investigating the relationship between ground‐glass opacity visibility and physical detectability index in low‐dose chest computed tomography
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5001
work_keys_str_mv AT ichikawakatsuhiro aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT kobayashitakeshi aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT sagawamotoyasu aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT katagiriayako aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT unoyukiko aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT nishiokaryo aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT matsuyamajun aphantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT ichikawakatsuhiro phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT kobayashitakeshi phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT sagawamotoyasu phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT katagiriayako phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT unoyukiko phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT nishiokaryo phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography
AT matsuyamajun phantomstudyinvestigatingtherelationshipbetweengroundglassopacityvisibilityandphysicaldetectabilityindexinlowdosechestcomputedtomography