Cargando…

Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

VMAT is an important tool in the treatment of head and neck cancers, many of which also require treatment to the supraclavicular lymph nodes. However, full VMAT arcs treating this nodal region necessarily cause entrance beam to pass through patients' shoulders. Thus, interfractional variations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casey, Kevin E., Wong, Pei‐Fong, Tung, Samuel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5206
_version_ 1783279507786956800
author Casey, Kevin E.
Wong, Pei‐Fong
Tung, Samuel S.
author_facet Casey, Kevin E.
Wong, Pei‐Fong
Tung, Samuel S.
author_sort Casey, Kevin E.
collection PubMed
description VMAT is an important tool in the treatment of head and neck cancers, many of which also require treatment to the supraclavicular lymph nodes. However, full VMAT arcs treating this nodal region necessarily cause entrance beam to pass through patients' shoulders. Thus, interfractional variations in shoulder position may cause unwanted dose perturbations. To assess this possibility, six patients undergoing treatment at our institution for head and neck cancers with associated supraclavicular lymph node treatment were imaged with in‐room CT‐on‐rails during the course of their treatments. This allowed for the establishment of a true record of the actual shoulder position during selected treatment fractions. Then, a full VMAT plan and a plan with VMAT arcs superior to the shoulder and a static anteroposterior field inferiorly were copied onto the patients' weekly image sets. The average one‐dimensional shoulder motion was generally within 10 mm of the simulated position, with some notable exceptions. The standard deviation in week‐to‐week shoulder position relative to simulation was 4.3 mm and 4.2 mm in the SI and AP dimensions, respectively. The average nodal target mean dose across all fractions sampled was within 5% of planned for all patients and both plans. Similarly, the average D95 for the nodal target was within 5% of planned across all fractions sampled, with the single exception of the full VMAT plan for one patient. In most cases, the standard deviation in both target mean dose and D95 was smaller with the VMAT+static AP field plan than it was with the full VMAT plan. PACS number: 87.55.‐x
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900062018-04-02 Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Casey, Kevin E. Wong, Pei‐Fong Tung, Samuel S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics VMAT is an important tool in the treatment of head and neck cancers, many of which also require treatment to the supraclavicular lymph nodes. However, full VMAT arcs treating this nodal region necessarily cause entrance beam to pass through patients' shoulders. Thus, interfractional variations in shoulder position may cause unwanted dose perturbations. To assess this possibility, six patients undergoing treatment at our institution for head and neck cancers with associated supraclavicular lymph node treatment were imaged with in‐room CT‐on‐rails during the course of their treatments. This allowed for the establishment of a true record of the actual shoulder position during selected treatment fractions. Then, a full VMAT plan and a plan with VMAT arcs superior to the shoulder and a static anteroposterior field inferiorly were copied onto the patients' weekly image sets. The average one‐dimensional shoulder motion was generally within 10 mm of the simulated position, with some notable exceptions. The standard deviation in week‐to‐week shoulder position relative to simulation was 4.3 mm and 4.2 mm in the SI and AP dimensions, respectively. The average nodal target mean dose across all fractions sampled was within 5% of planned for all patients and both plans. Similarly, the average D95 for the nodal target was within 5% of planned across all fractions sampled, with the single exception of the full VMAT plan for one patient. In most cases, the standard deviation in both target mean dose and D95 was smaller with the VMAT+static AP field plan than it was with the full VMAT plan. PACS number: 87.55.‐x John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690006/ /pubmed/26218996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5206 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Casey, Kevin E.
Wong, Pei‐Fong
Tung, Samuel S.
Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
title Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
title_full Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
title_fullStr Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
title_short Effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
title_sort effect of interfractional shoulder motion on low neck nodal targets for patients treated using volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (vmat)
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5206
work_keys_str_mv AT caseykevine effectofinterfractionalshouldermotiononlownecknodaltargetsforpatientstreatedusingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT wongpeifong effectofinterfractionalshouldermotiononlownecknodaltargetsforpatientstreatedusingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat
AT tungsamuels effectofinterfractionalshouldermotiononlownecknodaltargetsforpatientstreatedusingvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyvmat