Cargando…

Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter

This study investigated the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter, the RaySafe Xi transparent detector, by comparing its performance to a reference‐class ionization chamber. Firstly a comparison of dosimeter response “free‐in‐air” with standard beam qualities was made, fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tse, Jason, McLean, Donald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26219009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5439
_version_ 1783279508980236288
author Tse, Jason
McLean, Donald
author_facet Tse, Jason
McLean, Donald
author_sort Tse, Jason
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter, the RaySafe Xi transparent detector, by comparing its performance to a reference‐class ionization chamber. Firstly a comparison of dosimeter response “free‐in‐air” with standard beam qualities was made, followed by an investigation into its relative transparency in an X‐ray field and angular sensitivity dependence. The second part of the study looked at the overall performance of the transparent detector under scatter conditions with a number of beam qualities, including standard beam and those hardened by copper (Cu) filtration of thickness up to 0.9 mm, as would be encountered in the equipment testing of fluoroscopy systems. Overall, the transparent detector has demonstrated equivalent measurement properties to the ionization chamber under standard conditions and provided similar X‐ray attenuation as reflected by the nearly identical radiographic parameters selected for both dosimeters by the automatic dose rate control (ADRC) system. Yet, it also possessed an asymmetric angular response which respectively under‐ and overestimated the dose contribution from the rear and lateral directions by the same amount of 50%. The transparent detector provided comparable dose reading of [Formula: see text] to the ionization chamber with standard beam qualities and backscatter radiation present. These results were in good agreement with those of free‐in‐air measurement, indicating that the angular under‐ and overresponse might potentially compensate one another for accurate measurement. However, for identical Cu filtered beam qualities and setups, the transparent detector on average overresponded by 5.4% across the useful tube voltage range. In conclusion, the transparent detector, with its novel design, is essentially equivalent, within a 5% tolerance, to an ionization chamber, except in situations where beams hardened with Cu filtration are used with backscatter radiation present requiring larger uncertainty error estimations. PACS numbers: 87.57 uq, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.Dj
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900122018-04-02 Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter Tse, Jason McLean, Donald J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging This study investigated the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter, the RaySafe Xi transparent detector, by comparing its performance to a reference‐class ionization chamber. Firstly a comparison of dosimeter response “free‐in‐air” with standard beam qualities was made, followed by an investigation into its relative transparency in an X‐ray field and angular sensitivity dependence. The second part of the study looked at the overall performance of the transparent detector under scatter conditions with a number of beam qualities, including standard beam and those hardened by copper (Cu) filtration of thickness up to 0.9 mm, as would be encountered in the equipment testing of fluoroscopy systems. Overall, the transparent detector has demonstrated equivalent measurement properties to the ionization chamber under standard conditions and provided similar X‐ray attenuation as reflected by the nearly identical radiographic parameters selected for both dosimeters by the automatic dose rate control (ADRC) system. Yet, it also possessed an asymmetric angular response which respectively under‐ and overestimated the dose contribution from the rear and lateral directions by the same amount of 50%. The transparent detector provided comparable dose reading of [Formula: see text] to the ionization chamber with standard beam qualities and backscatter radiation present. These results were in good agreement with those of free‐in‐air measurement, indicating that the angular under‐ and overresponse might potentially compensate one another for accurate measurement. However, for identical Cu filtered beam qualities and setups, the transparent detector on average overresponded by 5.4% across the useful tube voltage range. In conclusion, the transparent detector, with its novel design, is essentially equivalent, within a 5% tolerance, to an ionization chamber, except in situations where beams hardened with Cu filtration are used with backscatter radiation present requiring larger uncertainty error estimations. PACS numbers: 87.57 uq, 87.59.C‐, 87.59.Dj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690012/ /pubmed/26219009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5439 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Tse, Jason
McLean, Donald
Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
title Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
title_full Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
title_fullStr Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
title_short Investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
title_sort investigation of the clinical performance of a novel solid‐state diagnostic dosimeter
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26219009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5439
work_keys_str_mv AT tsejason investigationoftheclinicalperformanceofanovelsolidstatediagnosticdosimeter
AT mcleandonald investigationoftheclinicalperformanceofanovelsolidstatediagnosticdosimeter