Cargando…

Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs

Geometric or mechanical accuracy of kV and MV imaging systems of two Varian TrueBeam linacs have been monitored by two geomertirc calibration systems, Varian IsoCal geometric calibration system and home‐developed gQA system. Results of both systems are cross‐checked and the long‐term geometric stabi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiu, Tsuicheng D., Yan, Yulong, Foster, Ryan, Mao, Weihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5140
_version_ 1783279510447194112
author Chiu, Tsuicheng D.
Yan, Yulong
Foster, Ryan
Mao, Weihua
author_facet Chiu, Tsuicheng D.
Yan, Yulong
Foster, Ryan
Mao, Weihua
author_sort Chiu, Tsuicheng D.
collection PubMed
description Geometric or mechanical accuracy of kV and MV imaging systems of two Varian TrueBeam linacs have been monitored by two geomertirc calibration systems, Varian IsoCal geometric calibration system and home‐developed gQA system. Results of both systems are cross‐checked and the long‐term geometric stabilities of linacs are evaluated. Two geometric calibration methodologies have been used to assess kV and MV imaging systems and their coincidence periodically on two TrueBeam linacs for about one year. Both systems analyze kV or MV projection images of special designed phantoms to retrieve geometric parameters of the imaging systems. The isocenters — laser isocenter and centers of rotations of kV imager and EPID — are then calculated, based on results of multiple projections from different angles. Long‐term calibration results from both systems are compared for cross‐checking. There are 24 sessions of side‐by‐side calibrations performed by both systems on two TrueBeam linacs. All the disagreements of isocenters between two calibrations systems are less than 1 mm with [Formula: see text] SD. Most of the large disagreements occurred in vertical direction (AP direction), with an averaged disagreement of 0.45 mm. The average disagreements of isocenters are 0.09 mm in other directions. Additional to long‐term calibration monitoring, for the accuracy test, special tests were performed by misaligning QA phantoms on purpose (5 mm away from setup isocenter in AP, SI, and lateral directions) to test the liability performance of both systems with the known deviations. The errors are within 0.5 mm. Both geometric calibration systems, IsoCal and gQA, are capable of detecting geometric deviations of kV and MV imaging systems of linacs. The long‐term evaluation also shows that the deviations of geometric parameters and the geometric accuracies of both linacs are small and very consistent during the one‐year study period. PACS number: 87.56.Fc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900182018-04-02 Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs Chiu, Tsuicheng D. Yan, Yulong Foster, Ryan Mao, Weihua J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Geometric or mechanical accuracy of kV and MV imaging systems of two Varian TrueBeam linacs have been monitored by two geomertirc calibration systems, Varian IsoCal geometric calibration system and home‐developed gQA system. Results of both systems are cross‐checked and the long‐term geometric stabilities of linacs are evaluated. Two geometric calibration methodologies have been used to assess kV and MV imaging systems and their coincidence periodically on two TrueBeam linacs for about one year. Both systems analyze kV or MV projection images of special designed phantoms to retrieve geometric parameters of the imaging systems. The isocenters — laser isocenter and centers of rotations of kV imager and EPID — are then calculated, based on results of multiple projections from different angles. Long‐term calibration results from both systems are compared for cross‐checking. There are 24 sessions of side‐by‐side calibrations performed by both systems on two TrueBeam linacs. All the disagreements of isocenters between two calibrations systems are less than 1 mm with [Formula: see text] SD. Most of the large disagreements occurred in vertical direction (AP direction), with an averaged disagreement of 0.45 mm. The average disagreements of isocenters are 0.09 mm in other directions. Additional to long‐term calibration monitoring, for the accuracy test, special tests were performed by misaligning QA phantoms on purpose (5 mm away from setup isocenter in AP, SI, and lateral directions) to test the liability performance of both systems with the known deviations. The errors are within 0.5 mm. Both geometric calibration systems, IsoCal and gQA, are capable of detecting geometric deviations of kV and MV imaging systems of linacs. The long‐term evaluation also shows that the deviations of geometric parameters and the geometric accuracies of both linacs are small and very consistent during the one‐year study period. PACS number: 87.56.Fc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690018/ /pubmed/26218992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5140 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Chiu, Tsuicheng D.
Yan, Yulong
Foster, Ryan
Mao, Weihua
Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
title Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
title_full Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
title_fullStr Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
title_short Long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kV and MV imaging systems for Linacs
title_sort long‐term evaluation and cross‐checking of two geometric calibrations of kv and mv imaging systems for linacs
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5140
work_keys_str_mv AT chiutsuichengd longtermevaluationandcrosscheckingoftwogeometriccalibrationsofkvandmvimagingsystemsforlinacs
AT yanyulong longtermevaluationandcrosscheckingoftwogeometriccalibrationsofkvandmvimagingsystemsforlinacs
AT fosterryan longtermevaluationandcrosscheckingoftwogeometriccalibrationsofkvandmvimagingsystemsforlinacs
AT maoweihua longtermevaluationandcrosscheckingoftwogeometriccalibrationsofkvandmvimagingsystemsforlinacs