Cargando…

A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR

There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X‐ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X‐ray systems. As a result, it is unclear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inaba, Yohei, Chida, Koichi, Kobayashi, Ryota, Zuguchi, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6231
_version_ 1783279514282885120
author Inaba, Yohei
Chida, Koichi
Kobayashi, Ryota
Zuguchi, Masayuki
author_facet Inaba, Yohei
Chida, Koichi
Kobayashi, Ryota
Zuguchi, Masayuki
author_sort Inaba, Yohei
collection PubMed
description There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X‐ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X‐ray systems. As a result, it is unclear whether the image quality of the X‐ray equipment currently used in IVR procedures is optimal. We compared the entrance surface doses and image quality of multiple IVR X‐ray systems. This study was conducted in 2014 at 13 medical facilities using 18 IVR X‐ray systems. We evaluated image quality and simultaneously measured the radiation dose. Entrance surface doses for fluoroscopy (duration, 1 min) and cineradiography (duration, 10 s) are measured using a 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate and skin dose monitor. The image quality (such as spatial resolution and low‐contrast detectability) of both fluoroscopy and cineradiography was evaluated using a QC phantom. For fluoroscopy, the average entrance surface dose using the 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate was 13.9 (range 2.1–28.2) mGy/min. For cineradiography, the average entrance surface dose was 24.6 (range 5.1–49.3) mGy/10 s. We found positive correlations between radiation doses and image quality scores, in general, especially for fluoroscopy. The differences in surface dose among the 18 IVR X‐ray systems were high (max/min, 9.7‐fold for cineradiography; 13.4‐fold for fluoroscopy). The differences in image quality scores (spatial resolution, low‐contrast detectability, and dynamic range) were also very large. In general, there tended to be a correlation between radiation dose and image quality. Periodical measurements of the radiation dose and image quality of the X‐ray equipment used for cineradiography and fluoroscopy in IVR are necessary. The need to minimize patient exposure requires that the dose be reduced to the minimum level that will generate an image with an acceptable degree of noise. PACS number(s): 87.57.C, 87.57.uq, 87.59.B, 87.59.bf, 87.59.C, 87.59.cf, 87.59.Dj
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900332018-04-02 A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR Inaba, Yohei Chida, Koichi Kobayashi, Ryota Zuguchi, Masayuki J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X‐ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X‐ray systems. As a result, it is unclear whether the image quality of the X‐ray equipment currently used in IVR procedures is optimal. We compared the entrance surface doses and image quality of multiple IVR X‐ray systems. This study was conducted in 2014 at 13 medical facilities using 18 IVR X‐ray systems. We evaluated image quality and simultaneously measured the radiation dose. Entrance surface doses for fluoroscopy (duration, 1 min) and cineradiography (duration, 10 s) are measured using a 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate and skin dose monitor. The image quality (such as spatial resolution and low‐contrast detectability) of both fluoroscopy and cineradiography was evaluated using a QC phantom. For fluoroscopy, the average entrance surface dose using the 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate was 13.9 (range 2.1–28.2) mGy/min. For cineradiography, the average entrance surface dose was 24.6 (range 5.1–49.3) mGy/10 s. We found positive correlations between radiation doses and image quality scores, in general, especially for fluoroscopy. The differences in surface dose among the 18 IVR X‐ray systems were high (max/min, 9.7‐fold for cineradiography; 13.4‐fold for fluoroscopy). The differences in image quality scores (spatial resolution, low‐contrast detectability, and dynamic range) were also very large. In general, there tended to be a correlation between radiation dose and image quality. Periodical measurements of the radiation dose and image quality of the X‐ray equipment used for cineradiography and fluoroscopy in IVR are necessary. The need to minimize patient exposure requires that the dose be reduced to the minimum level that will generate an image with an acceptable degree of noise. PACS number(s): 87.57.C, 87.57.uq, 87.59.B, 87.59.bf, 87.59.C, 87.59.cf, 87.59.Dj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690033/ /pubmed/27455503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6231 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Inaba, Yohei
Chida, Koichi
Kobayashi, Ryota
Zuguchi, Masayuki
A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
title A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
title_full A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
title_fullStr A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
title_full_unstemmed A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
title_short A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
title_sort cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of x‐ray equipment used in ivr
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6231
work_keys_str_mv AT inabayohei acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT chidakoichi acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT kobayashiryota acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT zuguchimasayuki acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT inabayohei crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT chidakoichi crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT kobayashiryota crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr
AT zuguchimasayuki crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr