Cargando…
A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR
There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X‐ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X‐ray systems. As a result, it is unclear...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6231 |
_version_ | 1783279514282885120 |
---|---|
author | Inaba, Yohei Chida, Koichi Kobayashi, Ryota Zuguchi, Masayuki |
author_facet | Inaba, Yohei Chida, Koichi Kobayashi, Ryota Zuguchi, Masayuki |
author_sort | Inaba, Yohei |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X‐ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X‐ray systems. As a result, it is unclear whether the image quality of the X‐ray equipment currently used in IVR procedures is optimal. We compared the entrance surface doses and image quality of multiple IVR X‐ray systems. This study was conducted in 2014 at 13 medical facilities using 18 IVR X‐ray systems. We evaluated image quality and simultaneously measured the radiation dose. Entrance surface doses for fluoroscopy (duration, 1 min) and cineradiography (duration, 10 s) are measured using a 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate and skin dose monitor. The image quality (such as spatial resolution and low‐contrast detectability) of both fluoroscopy and cineradiography was evaluated using a QC phantom. For fluoroscopy, the average entrance surface dose using the 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate was 13.9 (range 2.1–28.2) mGy/min. For cineradiography, the average entrance surface dose was 24.6 (range 5.1–49.3) mGy/10 s. We found positive correlations between radiation doses and image quality scores, in general, especially for fluoroscopy. The differences in surface dose among the 18 IVR X‐ray systems were high (max/min, 9.7‐fold for cineradiography; 13.4‐fold for fluoroscopy). The differences in image quality scores (spatial resolution, low‐contrast detectability, and dynamic range) were also very large. In general, there tended to be a correlation between radiation dose and image quality. Periodical measurements of the radiation dose and image quality of the X‐ray equipment used for cineradiography and fluoroscopy in IVR are necessary. The need to minimize patient exposure requires that the dose be reduced to the minimum level that will generate an image with an acceptable degree of noise. PACS number(s): 87.57.C, 87.57.uq, 87.59.B, 87.59.bf, 87.59.C, 87.59.cf, 87.59.Dj |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56900332018-04-02 A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR Inaba, Yohei Chida, Koichi Kobayashi, Ryota Zuguchi, Masayuki J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging There are case reports of injuries caused by the radiation from interventional radiology (IVR) X‐ray systems. Therefore, the management of radiation doses in IVR is important. However, no detailed report has evaluated image quality for a large number of IVR X‐ray systems. As a result, it is unclear whether the image quality of the X‐ray equipment currently used in IVR procedures is optimal. We compared the entrance surface doses and image quality of multiple IVR X‐ray systems. This study was conducted in 2014 at 13 medical facilities using 18 IVR X‐ray systems. We evaluated image quality and simultaneously measured the radiation dose. Entrance surface doses for fluoroscopy (duration, 1 min) and cineradiography (duration, 10 s) are measured using a 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate and skin dose monitor. The image quality (such as spatial resolution and low‐contrast detectability) of both fluoroscopy and cineradiography was evaluated using a QC phantom. For fluoroscopy, the average entrance surface dose using the 20‐cm‐thick acrylic plate was 13.9 (range 2.1–28.2) mGy/min. For cineradiography, the average entrance surface dose was 24.6 (range 5.1–49.3) mGy/10 s. We found positive correlations between radiation doses and image quality scores, in general, especially for fluoroscopy. The differences in surface dose among the 18 IVR X‐ray systems were high (max/min, 9.7‐fold for cineradiography; 13.4‐fold for fluoroscopy). The differences in image quality scores (spatial resolution, low‐contrast detectability, and dynamic range) were also very large. In general, there tended to be a correlation between radiation dose and image quality. Periodical measurements of the radiation dose and image quality of the X‐ray equipment used for cineradiography and fluoroscopy in IVR are necessary. The need to minimize patient exposure requires that the dose be reduced to the minimum level that will generate an image with an acceptable degree of noise. PACS number(s): 87.57.C, 87.57.uq, 87.59.B, 87.59.bf, 87.59.C, 87.59.cf, 87.59.Dj John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690033/ /pubmed/27455503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6231 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Inaba, Yohei Chida, Koichi Kobayashi, Ryota Zuguchi, Masayuki A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR |
title | A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR |
title_full | A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR |
title_fullStr | A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR |
title_short | A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR |
title_sort | cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of x‐ray equipment used in ivr |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inabayohei acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT chidakoichi acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT kobayashiryota acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT zuguchimasayuki acrosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT inabayohei crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT chidakoichi crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT kobayashiryota crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr AT zuguchimasayuki crosssectionalstudyoftheradiationdoseandimagequalityofxrayequipmentusedinivr |