Cargando…

Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery

2.5 MV electronic portal imaging, available on Varian TrueBeam machines, was characterized using various phantoms in this study. Its low‐contrast detectability, spatial resolution, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were compared with those of conventional 6 MV and kV planar imaging. Scatter effect i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Kwang Hyun, Snyder, Karen Chin, Kim, Jinkoo, Li, Haisen, Ning, Wen, Rusnac, Robert, Jackson, Paul, Gordon, James, Siddiqui, Salim M., Chetty, Indrin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6247
_version_ 1783279515961655296
author Song, Kwang Hyun
Snyder, Karen Chin
Kim, Jinkoo
Li, Haisen
Ning, Wen
Rusnac, Robert
Jackson, Paul
Gordon, James
Siddiqui, Salim M.
Chetty, Indrin J.
author_facet Song, Kwang Hyun
Snyder, Karen Chin
Kim, Jinkoo
Li, Haisen
Ning, Wen
Rusnac, Robert
Jackson, Paul
Gordon, James
Siddiqui, Salim M.
Chetty, Indrin J.
author_sort Song, Kwang Hyun
collection PubMed
description 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging, available on Varian TrueBeam machines, was characterized using various phantoms in this study. Its low‐contrast detectability, spatial resolution, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were compared with those of conventional 6 MV and kV planar imaging. Scatter effect in large patient body was simulated by adding solid water slabs along the beam path. The 2.5 MV imaging mode was also evaluated using clinically acquired images from 24 patients for the sites of brain, head and neck, lung, and abdomen. With respect to 6 MV, the 2.5 MV achieved higher contrast and preserved sharpness on bony structures with only half of the imaging dose. The quality of 2.5 MV imaging was comparable to that of kV imaging when the lateral separation of patient was greater than 38 cm, while the kV image quality degraded rapidly as patient separation increased. Based on the results of patient images, 2.5 MV imaging was better for cranial and extracranial SRS than the 6 MV imaging. PACS number(s): 87.57.C
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900402018-04-02 Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery Song, Kwang Hyun Snyder, Karen Chin Kim, Jinkoo Li, Haisen Ning, Wen Rusnac, Robert Jackson, Paul Gordon, James Siddiqui, Salim M. Chetty, Indrin J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging, available on Varian TrueBeam machines, was characterized using various phantoms in this study. Its low‐contrast detectability, spatial resolution, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) were compared with those of conventional 6 MV and kV planar imaging. Scatter effect in large patient body was simulated by adding solid water slabs along the beam path. The 2.5 MV imaging mode was also evaluated using clinically acquired images from 24 patients for the sites of brain, head and neck, lung, and abdomen. With respect to 6 MV, the 2.5 MV achieved higher contrast and preserved sharpness on bony structures with only half of the imaging dose. The quality of 2.5 MV imaging was comparable to that of kV imaging when the lateral separation of patient was greater than 38 cm, while the kV image quality degraded rapidly as patient separation increased. Based on the results of patient images, 2.5 MV imaging was better for cranial and extracranial SRS than the 6 MV imaging. PACS number(s): 87.57.C John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690040/ /pubmed/27455505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6247 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Song, Kwang Hyun
Snyder, Karen Chin
Kim, Jinkoo
Li, Haisen
Ning, Wen
Rusnac, Robert
Jackson, Paul
Gordon, James
Siddiqui, Salim M.
Chetty, Indrin J.
Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
title Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
title_full Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
title_fullStr Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
title_full_unstemmed Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
title_short Characterization and evaluation of 2.5 MV electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
title_sort characterization and evaluation of 2.5 mv electronic portal imaging for accurate localization of intra‐ and extracranial stereotactic radiosurgery
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6247
work_keys_str_mv AT songkwanghyun characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT snyderkarenchin characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT kimjinkoo characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT lihaisen characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT ningwen characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT rusnacrobert characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT jacksonpaul characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT gordonjames characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT siddiquisalimm characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery
AT chettyindrinj characterizationandevaluationof25mvelectronicportalimagingforaccuratelocalizationofintraandextracranialstereotacticradiosurgery