Cargando…

Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT

The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Masanao, Asada, Yasuki, Matsubara, Kosuke, Suzuki, Shouichi, Koshida, Kichiro, Matsunaga, Yuta, Haba, Tomonobu, Kawaguchi, Ai, Toyama, Hiroshi, Kato, Ryoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218
_version_ 1783279516423028736
author Kobayashi, Masanao
Asada, Yasuki
Matsubara, Kosuke
Suzuki, Shouichi
Koshida, Kichiro
Matsunaga, Yuta
Haba, Tomonobu
Kawaguchi, Ai
Toyama, Hiroshi
Kato, Ryoichi
author_facet Kobayashi, Masanao
Asada, Yasuki
Matsubara, Kosuke
Suzuki, Shouichi
Koshida, Kichiro
Matsunaga, Yuta
Haba, Tomonobu
Kawaguchi, Ai
Toyama, Hiroshi
Kato, Ryoichi
author_sort Kobayashi, Masanao
collection PubMed
description The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA, continuous CTA/cardiac function analysis (CFA), and CTA/CFA modulation. Accordingly, we clarified the CT dose index (CTDI) to determine the relationship between heart rate (HR) and X‐ray exposure. As a secondary objective, we compared radiation doses using modified ImPACT, a whole‐body dosimetry phantom study, and the k‐factor method to verify the validity of the dose results obtained with modified ImPACT. The effective dose determined for the reference person (4.66 mSv at 60 beats per minute (bpm) and 33.43 mSv at 90 bpm) were approximately 10% less than those determined for the phantom study (5.28 mSv and 36.68 mSv). The effective doses according to the k‐factor ([Formula: see text]; 2.57 mSv and 17.10 mSv) were significantly lower than those obtained with the other two methods. In the present study, we have shown that ImPACT, when modified for cardiac applications, can assess both absorbed and effective doses. The results of our dose comparison indicate that modified ImPACT dose assessment is a promising and practical method for evaluating coronary CTA. PACS number(s): 87.57.Q‐, 87.59.Dj, 87.57.uq
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900422018-04-02 Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT Kobayashi, Masanao Asada, Yasuki Matsubara, Kosuke Suzuki, Shouichi Koshida, Kichiro Matsunaga, Yuta Haba, Tomonobu Kawaguchi, Ai Toyama, Hiroshi Kato, Ryoichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA, continuous CTA/cardiac function analysis (CFA), and CTA/CFA modulation. Accordingly, we clarified the CT dose index (CTDI) to determine the relationship between heart rate (HR) and X‐ray exposure. As a secondary objective, we compared radiation doses using modified ImPACT, a whole‐body dosimetry phantom study, and the k‐factor method to verify the validity of the dose results obtained with modified ImPACT. The effective dose determined for the reference person (4.66 mSv at 60 beats per minute (bpm) and 33.43 mSv at 90 bpm) were approximately 10% less than those determined for the phantom study (5.28 mSv and 36.68 mSv). The effective doses according to the k‐factor ([Formula: see text]; 2.57 mSv and 17.10 mSv) were significantly lower than those obtained with the other two methods. In the present study, we have shown that ImPACT, when modified for cardiac applications, can assess both absorbed and effective doses. The results of our dose comparison indicate that modified ImPACT dose assessment is a promising and practical method for evaluating coronary CTA. PACS number(s): 87.57.Q‐, 87.59.Dj, 87.57.uq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690042/ /pubmed/27455500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Kobayashi, Masanao
Asada, Yasuki
Matsubara, Kosuke
Suzuki, Shouichi
Koshida, Kichiro
Matsunaga, Yuta
Haba, Tomonobu
Kawaguchi, Ai
Toyama, Hiroshi
Kato, Ryoichi
Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
title Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
title_full Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
title_fullStr Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
title_full_unstemmed Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
title_short Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
title_sort electrocardiogram‐gated coronary ct angiography dose estimates using impact
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashimasanao electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT asadayasuki electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT matsubarakosuke electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT suzukishouichi electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT koshidakichiro electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT matsunagayuta electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT habatomonobu electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT kawaguchiai electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT toyamahiroshi electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact
AT katoryoichi electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact