Cargando…
Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT
The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218 |
_version_ | 1783279516423028736 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Masanao Asada, Yasuki Matsubara, Kosuke Suzuki, Shouichi Koshida, Kichiro Matsunaga, Yuta Haba, Tomonobu Kawaguchi, Ai Toyama, Hiroshi Kato, Ryoichi |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Masanao Asada, Yasuki Matsubara, Kosuke Suzuki, Shouichi Koshida, Kichiro Matsunaga, Yuta Haba, Tomonobu Kawaguchi, Ai Toyama, Hiroshi Kato, Ryoichi |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Masanao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA, continuous CTA/cardiac function analysis (CFA), and CTA/CFA modulation. Accordingly, we clarified the CT dose index (CTDI) to determine the relationship between heart rate (HR) and X‐ray exposure. As a secondary objective, we compared radiation doses using modified ImPACT, a whole‐body dosimetry phantom study, and the k‐factor method to verify the validity of the dose results obtained with modified ImPACT. The effective dose determined for the reference person (4.66 mSv at 60 beats per minute (bpm) and 33.43 mSv at 90 bpm) were approximately 10% less than those determined for the phantom study (5.28 mSv and 36.68 mSv). The effective doses according to the k‐factor ([Formula: see text]; 2.57 mSv and 17.10 mSv) were significantly lower than those obtained with the other two methods. In the present study, we have shown that ImPACT, when modified for cardiac applications, can assess both absorbed and effective doses. The results of our dose comparison indicate that modified ImPACT dose assessment is a promising and practical method for evaluating coronary CTA. PACS number(s): 87.57.Q‐, 87.59.Dj, 87.57.uq |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56900422018-04-02 Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT Kobayashi, Masanao Asada, Yasuki Matsubara, Kosuke Suzuki, Shouichi Koshida, Kichiro Matsunaga, Yuta Haba, Tomonobu Kawaguchi, Ai Toyama, Hiroshi Kato, Ryoichi J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging The primary study objective was to assess radiation doses using a modified form of the Imaging Performance Assessment of Computed Tomography (CT) scanner (ImPACT) patient dosimetry for cardiac applications on an Aquilion ONE ViSION Edition scanner, including the Ca score, target computed tomography angiography (CTA), prospective CTA, continuous CTA/cardiac function analysis (CFA), and CTA/CFA modulation. Accordingly, we clarified the CT dose index (CTDI) to determine the relationship between heart rate (HR) and X‐ray exposure. As a secondary objective, we compared radiation doses using modified ImPACT, a whole‐body dosimetry phantom study, and the k‐factor method to verify the validity of the dose results obtained with modified ImPACT. The effective dose determined for the reference person (4.66 mSv at 60 beats per minute (bpm) and 33.43 mSv at 90 bpm) were approximately 10% less than those determined for the phantom study (5.28 mSv and 36.68 mSv). The effective doses according to the k‐factor ([Formula: see text]; 2.57 mSv and 17.10 mSv) were significantly lower than those obtained with the other two methods. In the present study, we have shown that ImPACT, when modified for cardiac applications, can assess both absorbed and effective doses. The results of our dose comparison indicate that modified ImPACT dose assessment is a promising and practical method for evaluating coronary CTA. PACS number(s): 87.57.Q‐, 87.59.Dj, 87.57.uq John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690042/ /pubmed/27455500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Kobayashi, Masanao Asada, Yasuki Matsubara, Kosuke Suzuki, Shouichi Koshida, Kichiro Matsunaga, Yuta Haba, Tomonobu Kawaguchi, Ai Toyama, Hiroshi Kato, Ryoichi Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT |
title | Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT |
title_full | Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT |
title_fullStr | Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT |
title_short | Electrocardiogram‐gated coronary CT angiography dose estimates using ImPACT |
title_sort | electrocardiogram‐gated coronary ct angiography dose estimates using impact |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashimasanao electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT asadayasuki electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT matsubarakosuke electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT suzukishouichi electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT koshidakichiro electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT matsunagayuta electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT habatomonobu electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT kawaguchiai electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT toyamahiroshi electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact AT katoryoichi electrocardiogramgatedcoronaryctangiographydoseestimatesusingimpact |