Cargando…

The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning

Atlas‐based autosegmentation is an established tool for segmenting structures for CT‐planned head and neck radiotherapy. MRI is being increasingly integrated into the planning process. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of MRI‐based, atlas‐based autosegmentation for organs at risk (O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wardman, Kieran, Prestwich, Robin J.D., Gooding, Mark J., Speight, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6051
_version_ 1783279517132914688
author Wardman, Kieran
Prestwich, Robin J.D.
Gooding, Mark J.
Speight, Richard J.
author_facet Wardman, Kieran
Prestwich, Robin J.D.
Gooding, Mark J.
Speight, Richard J.
author_sort Wardman, Kieran
collection PubMed
description Atlas‐based autosegmentation is an established tool for segmenting structures for CT‐planned head and neck radiotherapy. MRI is being increasingly integrated into the planning process. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of MRI‐based, atlas‐based autosegmentation for organs at risk (OAR) and lymph node levels, and to compare the segmentation accuracy with CT‐based autosegmentation. Fourteen patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer in a prospective imaging study underwent a T1‐weighted MRI and a PET‐CT (with dedicated contrast‐enhanced CT) in an immobilization mask. Organs at risk (orbits, parotids, brainstem, and spinal cord) and the left level II lymph node region were manually delineated on the CT and MRI separately. A ‘leave one out’ approach was used to automatically segment structures onto the remaining images separately for CT and MRI. Contour comparison was performed using multiple positional metrics: Dice index, mean distance to conformity (MDC), sensitivity index (Se Idx), and inclusion index (Incl Idx). Automatic segmentation using MRI of orbits, parotids, brainstem, and lymph node level was acceptable with a DICE coefficient of [Formula: see text] , MDC [Formula: see text] , Se Idx [Formula: see text] , Incl Idx [Formula: see text] Segmentation of the spinal cord was poor (Dice coefficient 0.37). The process of automatic segmentation was significantly better on MRI compared to CT for orbits, parotid glands, brainstem, and left lymph node level II by multiple positional metrics; spinal cord segmentation based on MRI was inferior compared with CT. Accurate atlas‐based automatic segmentation of OAR and lymph node levels is feasible using T1‐MRI; segmentation of the spinal cord was found to be poor. Comparison with CT‐based automatic segmentation suggests that the process is equally as, or more accurate, using MRI. These results support further translation of MRI‐based segmentation methodology into clinical practice. PACS number(s): 87.55.de
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900452018-04-02 The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning Wardman, Kieran Prestwich, Robin J.D. Gooding, Mark J. Speight, Richard J. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Atlas‐based autosegmentation is an established tool for segmenting structures for CT‐planned head and neck radiotherapy. MRI is being increasingly integrated into the planning process. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of MRI‐based, atlas‐based autosegmentation for organs at risk (OAR) and lymph node levels, and to compare the segmentation accuracy with CT‐based autosegmentation. Fourteen patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer in a prospective imaging study underwent a T1‐weighted MRI and a PET‐CT (with dedicated contrast‐enhanced CT) in an immobilization mask. Organs at risk (orbits, parotids, brainstem, and spinal cord) and the left level II lymph node region were manually delineated on the CT and MRI separately. A ‘leave one out’ approach was used to automatically segment structures onto the remaining images separately for CT and MRI. Contour comparison was performed using multiple positional metrics: Dice index, mean distance to conformity (MDC), sensitivity index (Se Idx), and inclusion index (Incl Idx). Automatic segmentation using MRI of orbits, parotids, brainstem, and lymph node level was acceptable with a DICE coefficient of [Formula: see text] , MDC [Formula: see text] , Se Idx [Formula: see text] , Incl Idx [Formula: see text] Segmentation of the spinal cord was poor (Dice coefficient 0.37). The process of automatic segmentation was significantly better on MRI compared to CT for orbits, parotid glands, brainstem, and left lymph node level II by multiple positional metrics; spinal cord segmentation based on MRI was inferior compared with CT. Accurate atlas‐based automatic segmentation of OAR and lymph node levels is feasible using T1‐MRI; segmentation of the spinal cord was found to be poor. Comparison with CT‐based automatic segmentation suggests that the process is equally as, or more accurate, using MRI. These results support further translation of MRI‐based segmentation methodology into clinical practice. PACS number(s): 87.55.de John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690045/ /pubmed/27455480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6051 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wardman, Kieran
Prestwich, Robin J.D.
Gooding, Mark J.
Speight, Richard J.
The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning
title The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning
title_full The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning
title_fullStr The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning
title_short The feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of MRI for H&N radiotherapy planning
title_sort feasibility of atlas‐based automatic segmentation of mri for h&n radiotherapy planning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6051
work_keys_str_mv AT wardmankieran thefeasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT prestwichrobinjd thefeasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT goodingmarkj thefeasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT speightrichardj thefeasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT wardmankieran feasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT prestwichrobinjd feasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT goodingmarkj feasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning
AT speightrichardj feasibilityofatlasbasedautomaticsegmentationofmriforhnradiotherapyplanning