Cargando…
Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6188 |
_version_ | 1783279519547785216 |
---|---|
author | Conroy, Leigh Yeung, Rosanna Watt, Elizabeth Quirk, Sarah Long, Karen Hudson, Alana Phan, Tien Smith, Wendy L. |
author_facet | Conroy, Leigh Yeung, Rosanna Watt, Elizabeth Quirk, Sarah Long, Karen Hudson, Alana Phan, Tien Smith, Wendy L. |
author_sort | Conroy, Leigh |
collection | PubMed |
description | A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine portal images from 42 patients. Central chest wall position from field edge and in‐field maximum heart distance (MHD) were manually measured on cine images and compared to the planned positions based on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). An in‐house program was designed to measure left anterior descending artery (LAD) and chest wall separation on the planning DIBH CT scan with respect to breath‐hold level (BHL) during simulation to determine a minimum BHL for VM‐DIBH eligibility. Systematic and random setup uncertainties of 3.0 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively, were found for VM‐DIBH treatment from the chest wall measurements. Intrabeam breath‐hold stability was found to be good, with over 96% of delivered fields within 3 mm. Average treatment MHD was significantly larger for those patients where some of the heart was planned in the field compared to patients whose heart was completely shielded in the plan (p < 0.001). No evidence for a minimum BHL was found, suggesting that all patients who can tolerate DIBH may yield a benefit from it. PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56900552018-04-02 Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy Conroy, Leigh Yeung, Rosanna Watt, Elizabeth Quirk, Sarah Long, Karen Hudson, Alana Phan, Tien Smith, Wendy L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine portal images from 42 patients. Central chest wall position from field edge and in‐field maximum heart distance (MHD) were manually measured on cine images and compared to the planned positions based on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). An in‐house program was designed to measure left anterior descending artery (LAD) and chest wall separation on the planning DIBH CT scan with respect to breath‐hold level (BHL) during simulation to determine a minimum BHL for VM‐DIBH eligibility. Systematic and random setup uncertainties of 3.0 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively, were found for VM‐DIBH treatment from the chest wall measurements. Intrabeam breath‐hold stability was found to be good, with over 96% of delivered fields within 3 mm. Average treatment MHD was significantly larger for those patients where some of the heart was planned in the field compared to patients whose heart was completely shielded in the plan (p < 0.001). No evidence for a minimum BHL was found, suggesting that all patients who can tolerate DIBH may yield a benefit from it. PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690055/ /pubmed/27455494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6188 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Conroy, Leigh Yeung, Rosanna Watt, Elizabeth Quirk, Sarah Long, Karen Hudson, Alana Phan, Tien Smith, Wendy L. Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
title | Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
title_full | Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
title_short | Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
title_sort | evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conroyleigh evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT yeungrosanna evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT wattelizabeth evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT quirksarah evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT longkaren evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT hudsonalana evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT phantien evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy AT smithwendyl evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy |