Cargando…

Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy

A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conroy, Leigh, Yeung, Rosanna, Watt, Elizabeth, Quirk, Sarah, Long, Karen, Hudson, Alana, Phan, Tien, Smith, Wendy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6188
_version_ 1783279519547785216
author Conroy, Leigh
Yeung, Rosanna
Watt, Elizabeth
Quirk, Sarah
Long, Karen
Hudson, Alana
Phan, Tien
Smith, Wendy L.
author_facet Conroy, Leigh
Yeung, Rosanna
Watt, Elizabeth
Quirk, Sarah
Long, Karen
Hudson, Alana
Phan, Tien
Smith, Wendy L.
author_sort Conroy, Leigh
collection PubMed
description A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine portal images from 42 patients. Central chest wall position from field edge and in‐field maximum heart distance (MHD) were manually measured on cine images and compared to the planned positions based on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). An in‐house program was designed to measure left anterior descending artery (LAD) and chest wall separation on the planning DIBH CT scan with respect to breath‐hold level (BHL) during simulation to determine a minimum BHL for VM‐DIBH eligibility. Systematic and random setup uncertainties of 3.0 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively, were found for VM‐DIBH treatment from the chest wall measurements. Intrabeam breath‐hold stability was found to be good, with over 96% of delivered fields within 3 mm. Average treatment MHD was significantly larger for those patients where some of the heart was planned in the field compared to patients whose heart was completely shielded in the plan (p < 0.001). No evidence for a minimum BHL was found, suggesting that all patients who can tolerate DIBH may yield a benefit from it. PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900552018-04-02 Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy Conroy, Leigh Yeung, Rosanna Watt, Elizabeth Quirk, Sarah Long, Karen Hudson, Alana Phan, Tien Smith, Wendy L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A low‐resource visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold (VM‐DIBH) technique was successfully implemented in our clinic to reduce cardiac dose in left‐sided breast radiotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively characterized the chest wall and heart positioning accuracy of VM‐DIBH using cine portal images from 42 patients. Central chest wall position from field edge and in‐field maximum heart distance (MHD) were manually measured on cine images and compared to the planned positions based on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). An in‐house program was designed to measure left anterior descending artery (LAD) and chest wall separation on the planning DIBH CT scan with respect to breath‐hold level (BHL) during simulation to determine a minimum BHL for VM‐DIBH eligibility. Systematic and random setup uncertainties of 3.0 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively, were found for VM‐DIBH treatment from the chest wall measurements. Intrabeam breath‐hold stability was found to be good, with over 96% of delivered fields within 3 mm. Average treatment MHD was significantly larger for those patients where some of the heart was planned in the field compared to patients whose heart was completely shielded in the plan (p < 0.001). No evidence for a minimum BHL was found, suggesting that all patients who can tolerate DIBH may yield a benefit from it. PACS number(s): 87.53.Jw, 87.53.Kn, 87.55.D‐ John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690055/ /pubmed/27455494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6188 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Conroy, Leigh
Yeung, Rosanna
Watt, Elizabeth
Quirk, Sarah
Long, Karen
Hudson, Alana
Phan, Tien
Smith, Wendy L.
Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
title Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of target and cardiac position during visually monitored deep inspiration breath‐hold for breast radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6188
work_keys_str_mv AT conroyleigh evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT yeungrosanna evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT wattelizabeth evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT quirksarah evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT longkaren evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT hudsonalana evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT phantien evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy
AT smithwendyl evaluationoftargetandcardiacpositionduringvisuallymonitoreddeepinspirationbreathholdforbreastradiotherapy