Cargando…

The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage

The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than [Formula: see text] phantom ion chamber poin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhen, Heming, Ouyang, Luo, Bao, Qinan, Qin, Nan, Stojadinovic, Strahinja, Pompos, Arnold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6101
_version_ 1783279520037470208
author Zhen, Heming
Ouyang, Luo
Bao, Qinan
Qin, Nan
Stojadinovic, Strahinja
Pompos, Arnold
author_facet Zhen, Heming
Ouyang, Luo
Bao, Qinan
Qin, Nan
Stojadinovic, Strahinja
Pompos, Arnold
author_sort Zhen, Heming
collection PubMed
description The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than [Formula: see text] phantom ion chamber point‐dose difference relative to planned dose were investigated. For each patient plan, 5 fractions were delivered. DynaLog files were recorded and centi‐MU pulses from dose integrator board for every control point (CP) were counted using a commercial pulse counter. The counter recorded CP MU agrees with DynaLog records, both showing an [Formula: see text] MU overshoot of the first segment of every beam. The 3D patient dose was recalculated from the counter records and compared to the planned dose, showing that the overshoot resulted in on average 2.05% of PTV [Formula: see text] error, and 2.49%, 2.61% and 2.45% of [Formula: see text] error for rectum, bladder, and bowel, respectively. The initial plans were then modified by inserting a specially designed MLC segment to the start of every beam. The modified plans were also delivered five times. The dose from the modified delivery was calculated using counter recorded CP MU. The corresponding [Formula: see text] parameters were all within 0.31% from the original plan. IMRT QA results also show a 2.2% improvement in ion chamber point‐dose agreement. The results demonstrate that the proposed plan modification method effectively eliminates the overdosage from the overshooting phenomenon. PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr, 87.55.km
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900572018-04-02 The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage Zhen, Heming Ouyang, Luo Bao, Qinan Qin, Nan Stojadinovic, Strahinja Pompos, Arnold J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The goal of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric impact of an overshooting phenomenon in step‐and‐shoot IMRT delivery, and to demonstrate a novel method to mitigate the issue. Five pelvis IMRT patients treated on Varian 2100C EX linacs with larger than [Formula: see text] phantom ion chamber point‐dose difference relative to planned dose were investigated. For each patient plan, 5 fractions were delivered. DynaLog files were recorded and centi‐MU pulses from dose integrator board for every control point (CP) were counted using a commercial pulse counter. The counter recorded CP MU agrees with DynaLog records, both showing an [Formula: see text] MU overshoot of the first segment of every beam. The 3D patient dose was recalculated from the counter records and compared to the planned dose, showing that the overshoot resulted in on average 2.05% of PTV [Formula: see text] error, and 2.49%, 2.61% and 2.45% of [Formula: see text] error for rectum, bladder, and bowel, respectively. The initial plans were then modified by inserting a specially designed MLC segment to the start of every beam. The modified plans were also delivered five times. The dose from the modified delivery was calculated using counter recorded CP MU. The corresponding [Formula: see text] parameters were all within 0.31% from the original plan. IMRT QA results also show a 2.2% improvement in ion chamber point‐dose agreement. The results demonstrate that the proposed plan modification method effectively eliminates the overdosage from the overshooting phenomenon. PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr, 87.55.km John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690057/ /pubmed/27455482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6101 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Zhen, Heming
Ouyang, Luo
Bao, Qinan
Qin, Nan
Stojadinovic, Strahinja
Pompos, Arnold
The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
title The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
title_full The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
title_fullStr The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
title_full_unstemmed The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
title_short The step‐and‐shoot IMRT overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
title_sort step‐and‐shoot imrt overshooting phenomenon: a novel method to mitigate patient overdosage
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27455482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6101
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenheming thestepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT ouyangluo thestepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT baoqinan thestepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT qinnan thestepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT stojadinovicstrahinja thestepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT pomposarnold thestepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT zhenheming stepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT ouyangluo stepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT baoqinan stepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT qinnan stepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT stojadinovicstrahinja stepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage
AT pomposarnold stepandshootimrtovershootingphenomenonanovelmethodtomitigatepatientoverdosage