Cargando…

Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system

The objective for this work was to develop a commissioning methodology for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system, as well as to establish a routine quality assurance program and appropriate guidance for clinical use based on the commissioning results. Various tests were developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iftimia, Ileana, Talmadge, Mike, Ladd, Ron, Halvorsen, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5156
_version_ 1783279524566269952
author Iftimia, Ileana
Talmadge, Mike
Ladd, Ron
Halvorsen, Per
author_facet Iftimia, Ileana
Talmadge, Mike
Ladd, Ron
Halvorsen, Per
author_sort Iftimia, Ileana
collection PubMed
description The objective for this work was to develop a commissioning methodology for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system, as well as to establish a routine quality assurance program and appropriate guidance for clinical use based on the commissioning results. Various tests were developed: 1) assessment of the accuracy of the displayed separation value; 2) validation of the dwell positions within each applicator; 3) assessment of the accuracy and precision of the applicator localization system; 4) assessment of the combined dose profile of two opposed applicators to confirm that they are coaxial; 5) measurement of the absolute dose delivered with each applicator to confirm acceptable agreement with dose based on Monte Carlo modeling; 6) measurements of the skin‐to‐center dose ratio using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters; and 7) assessment of the mammopad cushion's effect on the center dose. We found that the difference between the measured and the actual paddle separation is [Formula: see text] for the separation range of 3 cm to 7.5 cm. Radiochromic film measurements demonstrated that the number of dwell positions inside the applicators agree with the values from the vendor, for each applicator type and size. The shift needed for a good applicator‐grid alignment was within 0.2 cm. The dry‐run test using film demonstrated that the shift of the dosimetric center is within 0.15 cm. Dose measurements in water converted to polystyrene agreed within 5.0% with the Monte Carlo data in polystyrene for the same applicator type, size, and depth. A solid water‐to‐water (phantom) factor was obtained for each applicator, and all future annual quality assurance tests will be performed in solid water using an average value of 1.07 for the solid water‐to‐water factor. The skin‐to‐center dose ratio measurements support the Monte Carlo‐based values within 5.0% agreement. For the treatment separation range of 4 cm to 8 cm, the change in center dose would be [Formula: see text] for all applicators when using a compressed pad of 0.2 cm to 0.3 cm. The tests performed ensured that all treatment components of the AccuBoost system are functional and that a treatment plan can be delivered with acceptable accuracy. Based on the commissioning results, a quality assurance manual and guidance documents for clinical use were developed. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Da, 87.90.+y
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56900792018-04-02 Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system Iftimia, Ileana Talmadge, Mike Ladd, Ron Halvorsen, Per J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The objective for this work was to develop a commissioning methodology for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system, as well as to establish a routine quality assurance program and appropriate guidance for clinical use based on the commissioning results. Various tests were developed: 1) assessment of the accuracy of the displayed separation value; 2) validation of the dwell positions within each applicator; 3) assessment of the accuracy and precision of the applicator localization system; 4) assessment of the combined dose profile of two opposed applicators to confirm that they are coaxial; 5) measurement of the absolute dose delivered with each applicator to confirm acceptable agreement with dose based on Monte Carlo modeling; 6) measurements of the skin‐to‐center dose ratio using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters; and 7) assessment of the mammopad cushion's effect on the center dose. We found that the difference between the measured and the actual paddle separation is [Formula: see text] for the separation range of 3 cm to 7.5 cm. Radiochromic film measurements demonstrated that the number of dwell positions inside the applicators agree with the values from the vendor, for each applicator type and size. The shift needed for a good applicator‐grid alignment was within 0.2 cm. The dry‐run test using film demonstrated that the shift of the dosimetric center is within 0.15 cm. Dose measurements in water converted to polystyrene agreed within 5.0% with the Monte Carlo data in polystyrene for the same applicator type, size, and depth. A solid water‐to‐water (phantom) factor was obtained for each applicator, and all future annual quality assurance tests will be performed in solid water using an average value of 1.07 for the solid water‐to‐water factor. The skin‐to‐center dose ratio measurements support the Monte Carlo‐based values within 5.0% agreement. For the treatment separation range of 4 cm to 8 cm, the change in center dose would be [Formula: see text] for all applicators when using a compressed pad of 0.2 cm to 0.3 cm. The tests performed ensured that all treatment components of the AccuBoost system are functional and that a treatment plan can be delivered with acceptable accuracy. Based on the commissioning results, a quality assurance manual and guidance documents for clinical use were developed. PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Da, 87.90.+y John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690079/ /pubmed/26103184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5156 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Iftimia, Ileana
Talmadge, Mike
Ladd, Ron
Halvorsen, Per
Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system
title Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system
title_full Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system
title_fullStr Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system
title_short Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system
title_sort commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the accuboost system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5156
work_keys_str_mv AT iftimiaileana commissioningandqualityassuranceforthetreatmentdeliverycomponentsoftheaccuboostsystem
AT talmadgemike commissioningandqualityassuranceforthetreatmentdeliverycomponentsoftheaccuboostsystem
AT laddron commissioningandqualityassuranceforthetreatmentdeliverycomponentsoftheaccuboostsystem
AT halvorsenper commissioningandqualityassuranceforthetreatmentdeliverycomponentsoftheaccuboostsystem