Cargando…
Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model
We have previously developed a retrospective 4D‐MRI technique using body area as the respiratory surrogate, but generally, the reconstructed 4D MR images suffer from severe or mild artifacts mainly caused by irregular motion during image acquisition. Those image artifacts may potentially affect the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5165 |
_version_ | 1783279527685783552 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Juan Wang, Hongjun Yin, Yong Li, Dengwang |
author_facet | Yang, Juan Wang, Hongjun Yin, Yong Li, Dengwang |
author_sort | Yang, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have previously developed a retrospective 4D‐MRI technique using body area as the respiratory surrogate, but generally, the reconstructed 4D MR images suffer from severe or mild artifacts mainly caused by irregular motion during image acquisition. Those image artifacts may potentially affect the accuracy of tumor target delineation or the shape representation of surrounding nontarget tissues and organs. So the purpose of this study is to propose an approach employing principal component analysis (PCA), combined with a linear polynomial fitting model, to remodel the displacement vector fields (DVFs) obtained from deformable image registration (DIR), with the main goal of reducing the motion artifacts in 4D MR images. Seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (2/7) or liver metastases (5/7) in the liver, as well as a patient with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), were enrolled in an IRB‐approved prospective study. Both CT and MR simulations were performed for each patient for treatment planning. Multiple‐slice, multiple‐phase, cine‐MRI images were acquired in the axial plane for 4D‐MRI reconstruction. Single‐slice 2D cine‐MR images were acquired across the center of the tumor in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. For a 4D MR image dataset, the DVFs in three orthogonal direction (inferior–superior (SI), anterior–posterior (AP), and medial–lateral (ML)) relative to a specific reference phase were calculated using an in‐house DIR algorithm. The DVFs were preprocessed in three temporal and spatial dimensions using a polynomial fitting model, with the goal of correcting the potential registration errors introduced by three‐dimensional DIR. Then PCA was used to decompose each fitted DVF into a linear combination of three principal motion bases whose spanned subspaces combined with their projections had been validated to be sufficient to represent the regular respiratory motion. By wrapping the reference MR image using the remodeled DVFs, ‘synthetic’ MR images with reduced motion artifacts were generated at selected phase. Tumor motion trajectories derived from cine‐MRI, 4D CT, original 4D MRI, and ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI were analyzed in the SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. Their correlation coefficient (CC) and difference (D) in motion amplitude were calculated for comparison. Of all the patients, the means and standard deviations (SDs) of CC comparing ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI and cine‐MRI were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The [Formula: see text] Ds were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP and ML directions, respectively. The means and SDs of CC comparing ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI and 4D CT were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The [Formula: see text] Ds were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The means and SDs of CC comparing ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI and original 4D MRI were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The [Formula: see text] Ds were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. In this study we have proposed an approach employing PCA combined with a linear polynomial fitting model to capture the regular respiratory motion from a 4D MR image dataset. And its potential usefulness in reducing motion artifacts and improving image quality has been demonstrated by the preliminary results in oncological patients. PACS numbers: 87.57.cp, 87.57.nj, 87.61.‐c |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56900922018-04-02 Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model Yang, Juan Wang, Hongjun Yin, Yong Li, Dengwang J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We have previously developed a retrospective 4D‐MRI technique using body area as the respiratory surrogate, but generally, the reconstructed 4D MR images suffer from severe or mild artifacts mainly caused by irregular motion during image acquisition. Those image artifacts may potentially affect the accuracy of tumor target delineation or the shape representation of surrounding nontarget tissues and organs. So the purpose of this study is to propose an approach employing principal component analysis (PCA), combined with a linear polynomial fitting model, to remodel the displacement vector fields (DVFs) obtained from deformable image registration (DIR), with the main goal of reducing the motion artifacts in 4D MR images. Seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (2/7) or liver metastases (5/7) in the liver, as well as a patient with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), were enrolled in an IRB‐approved prospective study. Both CT and MR simulations were performed for each patient for treatment planning. Multiple‐slice, multiple‐phase, cine‐MRI images were acquired in the axial plane for 4D‐MRI reconstruction. Single‐slice 2D cine‐MR images were acquired across the center of the tumor in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. For a 4D MR image dataset, the DVFs in three orthogonal direction (inferior–superior (SI), anterior–posterior (AP), and medial–lateral (ML)) relative to a specific reference phase were calculated using an in‐house DIR algorithm. The DVFs were preprocessed in three temporal and spatial dimensions using a polynomial fitting model, with the goal of correcting the potential registration errors introduced by three‐dimensional DIR. Then PCA was used to decompose each fitted DVF into a linear combination of three principal motion bases whose spanned subspaces combined with their projections had been validated to be sufficient to represent the regular respiratory motion. By wrapping the reference MR image using the remodeled DVFs, ‘synthetic’ MR images with reduced motion artifacts were generated at selected phase. Tumor motion trajectories derived from cine‐MRI, 4D CT, original 4D MRI, and ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI were analyzed in the SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. Their correlation coefficient (CC) and difference (D) in motion amplitude were calculated for comparison. Of all the patients, the means and standard deviations (SDs) of CC comparing ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI and cine‐MRI were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The [Formula: see text] Ds were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP and ML directions, respectively. The means and SDs of CC comparing ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI and 4D CT were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The [Formula: see text] Ds were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The means and SDs of CC comparing ‘synthetic’ 4D MRI and original 4D MRI were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. The [Formula: see text] Ds were [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] in SI, AP, and ML directions, respectively. In this study we have proposed an approach employing PCA combined with a linear polynomial fitting model to capture the regular respiratory motion from a 4D MR image dataset. And its potential usefulness in reducing motion artifacts and improving image quality has been demonstrated by the preliminary results in oncological patients. PACS numbers: 87.57.cp, 87.57.nj, 87.61.‐c John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690092/ /pubmed/26103185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5165 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yang, Juan Wang, Hongjun Yin, Yong Li, Dengwang Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
title | Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
title_full | Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
title_fullStr | Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
title_short | Reducing motion artifacts in 4D MR images using principal component analysis (PCA) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
title_sort | reducing motion artifacts in 4d mr images using principal component analysis (pca) combined with linear polynomial fitting model |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjuan reducingmotionartifactsin4dmrimagesusingprincipalcomponentanalysispcacombinedwithlinearpolynomialfittingmodel AT wanghongjun reducingmotionartifactsin4dmrimagesusingprincipalcomponentanalysispcacombinedwithlinearpolynomialfittingmodel AT yinyong reducingmotionartifactsin4dmrimagesusingprincipalcomponentanalysispcacombinedwithlinearpolynomialfittingmodel AT lidengwang reducingmotionartifactsin4dmrimagesusingprincipalcomponentanalysispcacombinedwithlinearpolynomialfittingmodel |