Cargando…
Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy
The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup uncertainties for brain sites with ExacTrac X‐Ray 6D system and to provide optimal margin guidelines. Fifteen patients with brain tumor were included in this study. Two X‐ray images with ExacTrac X‐Ray 6D system were used to verify patient position and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5102 |
_version_ | 1783279530355458048 |
---|---|
author | Infusino, Erminia Trodella, Lucio Ramella, Sara D'Angelillo, Rolando M. Greco, Carlo Iurato, Aurelia Trodella, Luca E. Nacca, Alessandro Cornacchione, Patrizia Mameli, Alessandra |
author_facet | Infusino, Erminia Trodella, Lucio Ramella, Sara D'Angelillo, Rolando M. Greco, Carlo Iurato, Aurelia Trodella, Luca E. Nacca, Alessandro Cornacchione, Patrizia Mameli, Alessandra |
author_sort | Infusino, Erminia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup uncertainties for brain sites with ExacTrac X‐Ray 6D system and to provide optimal margin guidelines. Fifteen patients with brain tumor were included in this study. Two X‐ray images with ExacTrac X‐Ray 6D system were used to verify patient position and tumor target localization before each treatment. The 6D fusion software first generates various sets of DRRs with position variations in both three translational and three rotational directions (six degrees of freedom) for the CT images. Setup variations (translation and rotation) after correction were recorded and corrected before treatment. The 3D deviations are expressed as [Formula: see text]. The random error [Formula: see text] , systematic error [Formula: see text] , and group systematic error [Formula: see text] for the different X‐ray were calculated using the definitions of van Herk. ((1)) Mean setup errors were calculated from X‐ray images acquired after all fractions. There is moderate patient‐to‐patient variation in the vertical direction and small variations in systematic errors and magnitudes of random errors are smaller. The global systematic errors were measured to be less than 2.0 mm in each direction. Random component of all patients are smaller ranging from 0.1–0.3 mm small. The safety margin (SM) to the lateral, is 0.5 mm and 2.6 mm for van Herk ((1)) and Stroom et al., ((2)) respectively, craniocaudal axis is 1.5 mm and 3.4 mm, respectively, and with respect to the antero–posterior axis, 2.3 mm and 3.9 mm. Daily X‐ray imaging is essential to compare and assess the accuracy of treatment delivery to different anatomical locations. PACS number: 87.55.D |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56901032018-04-02 Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy Infusino, Erminia Trodella, Lucio Ramella, Sara D'Angelillo, Rolando M. Greco, Carlo Iurato, Aurelia Trodella, Luca E. Nacca, Alessandro Cornacchione, Patrizia Mameli, Alessandra J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this study was to evaluate setup uncertainties for brain sites with ExacTrac X‐Ray 6D system and to provide optimal margin guidelines. Fifteen patients with brain tumor were included in this study. Two X‐ray images with ExacTrac X‐Ray 6D system were used to verify patient position and tumor target localization before each treatment. The 6D fusion software first generates various sets of DRRs with position variations in both three translational and three rotational directions (six degrees of freedom) for the CT images. Setup variations (translation and rotation) after correction were recorded and corrected before treatment. The 3D deviations are expressed as [Formula: see text]. The random error [Formula: see text] , systematic error [Formula: see text] , and group systematic error [Formula: see text] for the different X‐ray were calculated using the definitions of van Herk. ((1)) Mean setup errors were calculated from X‐ray images acquired after all fractions. There is moderate patient‐to‐patient variation in the vertical direction and small variations in systematic errors and magnitudes of random errors are smaller. The global systematic errors were measured to be less than 2.0 mm in each direction. Random component of all patients are smaller ranging from 0.1–0.3 mm small. The safety margin (SM) to the lateral, is 0.5 mm and 2.6 mm for van Herk ((1)) and Stroom et al., ((2)) respectively, craniocaudal axis is 1.5 mm and 3.4 mm, respectively, and with respect to the antero–posterior axis, 2.3 mm and 3.9 mm. Daily X‐ray imaging is essential to compare and assess the accuracy of treatment delivery to different anatomical locations. PACS number: 87.55.D John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690103/ /pubmed/26103179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5102 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Infusino, Erminia Trodella, Lucio Ramella, Sara D'Angelillo, Rolando M. Greco, Carlo Iurato, Aurelia Trodella, Luca E. Nacca, Alessandro Cornacchione, Patrizia Mameli, Alessandra Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
title | Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_full | Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_short | Estimation of patient setup uncertainty using BrainLAB Exatrac X‐Ray 6D system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
title_sort | estimation of patient setup uncertainty using brainlab exatrac x‐ray 6d system in image‐guided radiotherapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT infusinoerminia estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT trodellalucio estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT ramellasara estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT dangelillorolandom estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT grecocarlo estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT iuratoaurelia estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT trodellalucae estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT naccaalessandro estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT cornacchionepatrizia estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy AT mamelialessandra estimationofpatientsetupuncertaintyusingbrainlabexatracxray6dsysteminimageguidedradiotherapy |