Cargando…

Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group

This report describes the current state of flattening filter‐free (FFF) radiotherapy beams implemented on conventional linear accelerators, and is aimed primarily at practicing medical physicists. The Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Ying, Kry, Stephen F., Popple, Richard, Yorke, Ellen, Papanikolaou, Niko, Stathakis, Sotirios, Xia, Ping, Huq, Saiful, Bayouth, John, Galvin, James, Yin, Fang‐Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219
_version_ 1783279531542446080
author Xiao, Ying
Kry, Stephen F.
Popple, Richard
Yorke, Ellen
Papanikolaou, Niko
Stathakis, Sotirios
Xia, Ping
Huq, Saiful
Bayouth, John
Galvin, James
Yin, Fang‐Fang
author_facet Xiao, Ying
Kry, Stephen F.
Popple, Richard
Yorke, Ellen
Papanikolaou, Niko
Stathakis, Sotirios
Xia, Ping
Huq, Saiful
Bayouth, John
Galvin, James
Yin, Fang‐Fang
author_sort Xiao, Ying
collection PubMed
description This report describes the current state of flattening filter‐free (FFF) radiotherapy beams implemented on conventional linear accelerators, and is aimed primarily at practicing medical physicists. The Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed a writing group to assess FFF technology. The published literature on FFF technology was reviewed, along with technical specifications provided by vendors. Based on this information, supplemented by the clinical experience of the group members, consensus guidelines and recommendations for implementation of FFF technology were developed. Areas in need of further investigation were identified. Removing the flattening filter increases beam intensity, especially near the central axis. Increased intensity reduces treatment time, especially for high‐dose stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS). Furthermore, removing the flattening filter reduces out‐of‐field dose and improves beam modeling accuracy. FFF beams are advantageous for small field (e.g., SRS) treatments and are appropriate for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). For conventional 3D radiotherapy of large targets, FFF beams may be disadvantageous compared to flattened beams because of the heterogeneity of FFF beam across the target (unless modulation is employed). For any application, the nonflat beam characteristics and substantially higher dose rates require consideration during the commissioning and quality assurance processes relative to flattened beams, and the appropriate clinical use of the technology needs to be identified. Consideration also needs to be given to these unique characteristics when undertaking facility planning. Several areas still warrant further research and development. Recommendations pertinent to FFF technology, including acceptance testing, commissioning, quality assurance, radiation safety, and facility planning, are presented. Examples of clinical applications are provided. Several of the areas in which future research and development are needed are also indicated. PACS number: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.55.N‐, 87.56.bc
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56901082018-04-02 Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group Xiao, Ying Kry, Stephen F. Popple, Richard Yorke, Ellen Papanikolaou, Niko Stathakis, Sotirios Xia, Ping Huq, Saiful Bayouth, John Galvin, James Yin, Fang‐Fang J Appl Clin Med Phys AAPM Reports & Documents This report describes the current state of flattening filter‐free (FFF) radiotherapy beams implemented on conventional linear accelerators, and is aimed primarily at practicing medical physicists. The Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed a writing group to assess FFF technology. The published literature on FFF technology was reviewed, along with technical specifications provided by vendors. Based on this information, supplemented by the clinical experience of the group members, consensus guidelines and recommendations for implementation of FFF technology were developed. Areas in need of further investigation were identified. Removing the flattening filter increases beam intensity, especially near the central axis. Increased intensity reduces treatment time, especially for high‐dose stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRT/SRS). Furthermore, removing the flattening filter reduces out‐of‐field dose and improves beam modeling accuracy. FFF beams are advantageous for small field (e.g., SRS) treatments and are appropriate for intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). For conventional 3D radiotherapy of large targets, FFF beams may be disadvantageous compared to flattened beams because of the heterogeneity of FFF beam across the target (unless modulation is employed). For any application, the nonflat beam characteristics and substantially higher dose rates require consideration during the commissioning and quality assurance processes relative to flattened beams, and the appropriate clinical use of the technology needs to be identified. Consideration also needs to be given to these unique characteristics when undertaking facility planning. Several areas still warrant further research and development. Recommendations pertinent to FFF technology, including acceptance testing, commissioning, quality assurance, radiation safety, and facility planning, are presented. Examples of clinical applications are provided. Several of the areas in which future research and development are needed are also indicated. PACS number: 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.55.N‐, 87.56.bc John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690108/ /pubmed/26103482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle AAPM Reports & Documents
Xiao, Ying
Kry, Stephen F.
Popple, Richard
Yorke, Ellen
Papanikolaou, Niko
Stathakis, Sotirios
Xia, Ping
Huq, Saiful
Bayouth, John
Galvin, James
Yin, Fang‐Fang
Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group
title Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group
title_full Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group
title_fullStr Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group
title_full_unstemmed Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group
title_short Flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group
title_sort flattening filter‐free accelerators: a report from the aapm therapy emerging technology assessment work group
topic AAPM Reports & Documents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5219
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoying flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT krystephenf flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT popplerichard flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT yorkeellen flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT papanikolaouniko flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT stathakissotirios flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT xiaping flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT huqsaiful flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT bayouthjohn flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT galvinjames flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup
AT yinfangfang flatteningfilterfreeacceleratorsareportfromtheaapmtherapyemergingtechnologyassessmentworkgroup