Cargando…

Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy

Calibrating the dose per monitor unit (DMU) for individual patients is important to deliver the prescribed dose in radiation therapy. We have developed a DMU calculation method combining measurement data and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for the double scattering system in proton...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hotta, Kenji, Kohno, Ryosuke, Nagafuchi, Kohsuke, Yamaguchi, Hidenori, Tansho, Ryohei, Takada, Yoshihisa, Akimoto, Tetsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419
_version_ 1783279542198075392
author Hotta, Kenji
Kohno, Ryosuke
Nagafuchi, Kohsuke
Yamaguchi, Hidenori
Tansho, Ryohei
Takada, Yoshihisa
Akimoto, Tetsuo
author_facet Hotta, Kenji
Kohno, Ryosuke
Nagafuchi, Kohsuke
Yamaguchi, Hidenori
Tansho, Ryohei
Takada, Yoshihisa
Akimoto, Tetsuo
author_sort Hotta, Kenji
collection PubMed
description Calibrating the dose per monitor unit (DMU) for individual patients is important to deliver the prescribed dose in radiation therapy. We have developed a DMU calculation method combining measurement data and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for the double scattering system in proton beam therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East in Japan. The DMU calculation method determines the clinical DMU by the multiplication of three factors: a beam spreading device factor [Formula: see text] , a patient‐specific device factor [Formula: see text] , and a field‐size correction factor [Formula: see text]. We compared the calculated and the measured DMU for 75 dose fields in clinical cases. The calculated DMUs were in agreement with measurements in [Formula: see text] for all of 25 fields in prostate cancer cases, and in [Formula: see text] for 94% of 50 fields in head and neck (H&N) and lung cancer cases, including irregular shape fields and small fields. Although the [Formula: see text] in the DMU calculations is dominant as expected, we found that the patient‐specific device factor and field‐size correction also contribute significantly to the calculated DMU. This DMU calculation method will be able to substitute the conventional DMU measurement for the majority of clinical cases with a reasonable calculation time required for clinical use. PACS number: 87.55.kh
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56901522018-04-02 Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy Hotta, Kenji Kohno, Ryosuke Nagafuchi, Kohsuke Yamaguchi, Hidenori Tansho, Ryohei Takada, Yoshihisa Akimoto, Tetsuo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Calibrating the dose per monitor unit (DMU) for individual patients is important to deliver the prescribed dose in radiation therapy. We have developed a DMU calculation method combining measurement data and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for the double scattering system in proton beam therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East in Japan. The DMU calculation method determines the clinical DMU by the multiplication of three factors: a beam spreading device factor [Formula: see text] , a patient‐specific device factor [Formula: see text] , and a field‐size correction factor [Formula: see text]. We compared the calculated and the measured DMU for 75 dose fields in clinical cases. The calculated DMUs were in agreement with measurements in [Formula: see text] for all of 25 fields in prostate cancer cases, and in [Formula: see text] for 94% of 50 fields in head and neck (H&N) and lung cancer cases, including irregular shape fields and small fields. Although the [Formula: see text] in the DMU calculations is dominant as expected, we found that the patient‐specific device factor and field‐size correction also contribute significantly to the calculated DMU. This DMU calculation method will be able to substitute the conventional DMU measurement for the majority of clinical cases with a reasonable calculation time required for clinical use. PACS number: 87.55.kh John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690152/ /pubmed/26699303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Hotta, Kenji
Kohno, Ryosuke
Nagafuchi, Kohsuke
Yamaguchi, Hidenori
Tansho, Ryohei
Takada, Yoshihisa
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
title Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
title_full Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
title_short Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
title_sort evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified monte carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419
work_keys_str_mv AT hottakenji evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy
AT kohnoryosuke evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy
AT nagafuchikohsuke evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy
AT yamaguchihidenori evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy
AT tanshoryohei evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy
AT takadayoshihisa evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy
AT akimototetsuo evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy