Cargando…
Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy
Calibrating the dose per monitor unit (DMU) for individual patients is important to deliver the prescribed dose in radiation therapy. We have developed a DMU calculation method combining measurement data and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for the double scattering system in proton...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419 |
_version_ | 1783279542198075392 |
---|---|
author | Hotta, Kenji Kohno, Ryosuke Nagafuchi, Kohsuke Yamaguchi, Hidenori Tansho, Ryohei Takada, Yoshihisa Akimoto, Tetsuo |
author_facet | Hotta, Kenji Kohno, Ryosuke Nagafuchi, Kohsuke Yamaguchi, Hidenori Tansho, Ryohei Takada, Yoshihisa Akimoto, Tetsuo |
author_sort | Hotta, Kenji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Calibrating the dose per monitor unit (DMU) for individual patients is important to deliver the prescribed dose in radiation therapy. We have developed a DMU calculation method combining measurement data and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for the double scattering system in proton beam therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East in Japan. The DMU calculation method determines the clinical DMU by the multiplication of three factors: a beam spreading device factor [Formula: see text] , a patient‐specific device factor [Formula: see text] , and a field‐size correction factor [Formula: see text]. We compared the calculated and the measured DMU for 75 dose fields in clinical cases. The calculated DMUs were in agreement with measurements in [Formula: see text] for all of 25 fields in prostate cancer cases, and in [Formula: see text] for 94% of 50 fields in head and neck (H&N) and lung cancer cases, including irregular shape fields and small fields. Although the [Formula: see text] in the DMU calculations is dominant as expected, we found that the patient‐specific device factor and field‐size correction also contribute significantly to the calculated DMU. This DMU calculation method will be able to substitute the conventional DMU measurement for the majority of clinical cases with a reasonable calculation time required for clinical use. PACS number: 87.55.kh |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56901522018-04-02 Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy Hotta, Kenji Kohno, Ryosuke Nagafuchi, Kohsuke Yamaguchi, Hidenori Tansho, Ryohei Takada, Yoshihisa Akimoto, Tetsuo J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Calibrating the dose per monitor unit (DMU) for individual patients is important to deliver the prescribed dose in radiation therapy. We have developed a DMU calculation method combining measurement data and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for the double scattering system in proton beam therapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East in Japan. The DMU calculation method determines the clinical DMU by the multiplication of three factors: a beam spreading device factor [Formula: see text] , a patient‐specific device factor [Formula: see text] , and a field‐size correction factor [Formula: see text]. We compared the calculated and the measured DMU for 75 dose fields in clinical cases. The calculated DMUs were in agreement with measurements in [Formula: see text] for all of 25 fields in prostate cancer cases, and in [Formula: see text] for 94% of 50 fields in head and neck (H&N) and lung cancer cases, including irregular shape fields and small fields. Although the [Formula: see text] in the DMU calculations is dominant as expected, we found that the patient‐specific device factor and field‐size correction also contribute significantly to the calculated DMU. This DMU calculation method will be able to substitute the conventional DMU measurement for the majority of clinical cases with a reasonable calculation time required for clinical use. PACS number: 87.55.kh John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690152/ /pubmed/26699303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Hotta, Kenji Kohno, Ryosuke Nagafuchi, Kohsuke Yamaguchi, Hidenori Tansho, Ryohei Takada, Yoshihisa Akimoto, Tetsuo Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
title | Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
title_full | Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
title_short | Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
title_sort | evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified monte carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hottakenji evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy AT kohnoryosuke evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy AT nagafuchikohsuke evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy AT yamaguchihidenori evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy AT tanshoryohei evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy AT takadayoshihisa evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy AT akimototetsuo evaluationofmonitorunitcalculationbasedonmeasurementandcalculationwithasimplifiedmontecarlomethodforpassivebeamdeliverysysteminprotonbeamtherapy |