Cargando…

Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants

There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Sarah L, Beaufort, Catherine L., Millar, Jeremy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.4720
_version_ 1783279547401109504
author Elliott, Sarah L
Beaufort, Catherine L.
Millar, Jeremy L.
author_facet Elliott, Sarah L
Beaufort, Catherine L.
Millar, Jeremy L.
author_sort Elliott, Sarah L
collection PubMed
description There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of patients were implanted using seeds of strength [Formula: see text]. Twenty consecutive patients were selected for this study; ten patients were implanted with 0.4 U seeds and the next ten patients implanted with 0.7 U seeds. Postimplant dosimetry for the target volume, urethra, and rectal wall was compared between the two groups. Our data showed a small and insignificant decrease in the total theatre time when implanting seeds of higher strength. The mean number of seeds required per implant decreased by over 30% for the 0.7 U implants, and the mean number of needles decreased by eight needles. The mean D90 (%) was marginally lower for the 0.7 U group, and spread over a wider range of values. Doses to the rectal wall were slightly higher for the 0.7 U group. At six years postimplant, the symptom scores for urinary and rectal toxicity and erectile function were similar to those reported before brachytherapy, with little differences between the 0.4 U and 0.7 U groups. Our experiences and practical advice in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants are reported in this paper. PACS number: 87.53.Jw
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56901722018-04-02 Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants Elliott, Sarah L Beaufort, Catherine L. Millar, Jeremy L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of patients were implanted using seeds of strength [Formula: see text]. Twenty consecutive patients were selected for this study; ten patients were implanted with 0.4 U seeds and the next ten patients implanted with 0.7 U seeds. Postimplant dosimetry for the target volume, urethra, and rectal wall was compared between the two groups. Our data showed a small and insignificant decrease in the total theatre time when implanting seeds of higher strength. The mean number of seeds required per implant decreased by over 30% for the 0.7 U implants, and the mean number of needles decreased by eight needles. The mean D90 (%) was marginally lower for the 0.7 U group, and spread over a wider range of values. Doses to the rectal wall were slightly higher for the 0.7 U group. At six years postimplant, the symptom scores for urinary and rectal toxicity and erectile function were similar to those reported before brachytherapy, with little differences between the 0.4 U and 0.7 U groups. Our experiences and practical advice in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants are reported in this paper. PACS number: 87.53.Jw John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690172/ /pubmed/26699289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.4720 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Elliott, Sarah L
Beaufort, Catherine L.
Millar, Jeremy L.
Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
title Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
title_full Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
title_fullStr Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
title_full_unstemmed Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
title_short Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
title_sort practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.4720
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottsarahl practicalconsiderationsintheselectionofseedstrengthforprostateimplants
AT beaufortcatherinel practicalconsiderationsintheselectionofseedstrengthforprostateimplants
AT millarjeremyl practicalconsiderationsintheselectionofseedstrengthforprostateimplants