Cargando…
Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants
There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of pati...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.4720 |
_version_ | 1783279547401109504 |
---|---|
author | Elliott, Sarah L Beaufort, Catherine L. Millar, Jeremy L. |
author_facet | Elliott, Sarah L Beaufort, Catherine L. Millar, Jeremy L. |
author_sort | Elliott, Sarah L |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of patients were implanted using seeds of strength [Formula: see text]. Twenty consecutive patients were selected for this study; ten patients were implanted with 0.4 U seeds and the next ten patients implanted with 0.7 U seeds. Postimplant dosimetry for the target volume, urethra, and rectal wall was compared between the two groups. Our data showed a small and insignificant decrease in the total theatre time when implanting seeds of higher strength. The mean number of seeds required per implant decreased by over 30% for the 0.7 U implants, and the mean number of needles decreased by eight needles. The mean D90 (%) was marginally lower for the 0.7 U group, and spread over a wider range of values. Doses to the rectal wall were slightly higher for the 0.7 U group. At six years postimplant, the symptom scores for urinary and rectal toxicity and erectile function were similar to those reported before brachytherapy, with little differences between the 0.4 U and 0.7 U groups. Our experiences and practical advice in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants are reported in this paper. PACS number: 87.53.Jw |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56901722018-04-02 Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants Elliott, Sarah L Beaufort, Catherine L. Millar, Jeremy L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics There are advantages in using lower numbers of higher activity seeds for prostate seed implants. This work investigated the use of higher strength seeds for our manually optimized prostate implants. Following a planning study using a range of seeds strengths between 0.4 U and 0.7 U, a series of patients were implanted using seeds of strength [Formula: see text]. Twenty consecutive patients were selected for this study; ten patients were implanted with 0.4 U seeds and the next ten patients implanted with 0.7 U seeds. Postimplant dosimetry for the target volume, urethra, and rectal wall was compared between the two groups. Our data showed a small and insignificant decrease in the total theatre time when implanting seeds of higher strength. The mean number of seeds required per implant decreased by over 30% for the 0.7 U implants, and the mean number of needles decreased by eight needles. The mean D90 (%) was marginally lower for the 0.7 U group, and spread over a wider range of values. Doses to the rectal wall were slightly higher for the 0.7 U group. At six years postimplant, the symptom scores for urinary and rectal toxicity and erectile function were similar to those reported before brachytherapy, with little differences between the 0.4 U and 0.7 U groups. Our experiences and practical advice in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants are reported in this paper. PACS number: 87.53.Jw John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690172/ /pubmed/26699289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.4720 Text en © 2015 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Elliott, Sarah L Beaufort, Catherine L. Millar, Jeremy L. Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
title | Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
title_full | Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
title_fullStr | Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
title_short | Practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
title_sort | practical considerations in the selection of seed strength for prostate implants |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26699289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.4720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliottsarahl practicalconsiderationsintheselectionofseedstrengthforprostateimplants AT beaufortcatherinel practicalconsiderationsintheselectionofseedstrengthforprostateimplants AT millarjeremyl practicalconsiderationsintheselectionofseedstrengthforprostateimplants |