Cargando…

On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors

We investigate the sensitivity of IMRT commissioning using the TG‐119 C‐shape phantom and credentialing with the IROC head and neck phantom to treatment planning system commissioning errors. We introduced errors into the various aspects of the commissioning process for a 6X photon energy modeled usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McVicker, Drew, Yin, Fang‐Fang, Adamson, Justus D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5452
_version_ 1783279552502431744
author McVicker, Drew
Yin, Fang‐Fang
Adamson, Justus D.
author_facet McVicker, Drew
Yin, Fang‐Fang
Adamson, Justus D.
author_sort McVicker, Drew
collection PubMed
description We investigate the sensitivity of IMRT commissioning using the TG‐119 C‐shape phantom and credentialing with the IROC head and neck phantom to treatment planning system commissioning errors. We introduced errors into the various aspects of the commissioning process for a 6X photon energy modeled using the analytical anisotropic algorithm within a commercial treatment planning system. Errors were implemented into the various components of the dose calculation algorithm including primary photons, secondary photons, electron contamination, and MLC parameters. For each error we evaluated the probability that it could be committed unknowingly during the dose algorithm commissioning stage, and the probability of it being identified during the verification stage. The clinical impact of each commissioning error was evaluated using representative IMRT plans including low and intermediate risk prostate, head and neck, mesothelioma, and scalp; the sensitivity of the TG‐119 and IROC phantoms was evaluated by comparing dosimetric changes to the dose planes where film measurements occur and change in point doses where dosimeter measurements occur. No commissioning errors were found to have both a low probability of detection and high clinical severity. When errors do occur, the IROC credentialing and TG 119 commissioning criteria are generally effective at detecting them; however, for the IROC phantom, OAR point‐dose measurements are the most sensitive despite being currently excluded from IROC analysis. Point‐dose measurements with an absolute dose constraint were the most effective at detecting errors, while film analysis using a gamma comparison and the IROC film distance to agreement criteria were less effective at detecting the specific commissioning errors implemented here. PACS number: 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56901932018-04-02 On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors McVicker, Drew Yin, Fang‐Fang Adamson, Justus D. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We investigate the sensitivity of IMRT commissioning using the TG‐119 C‐shape phantom and credentialing with the IROC head and neck phantom to treatment planning system commissioning errors. We introduced errors into the various aspects of the commissioning process for a 6X photon energy modeled using the analytical anisotropic algorithm within a commercial treatment planning system. Errors were implemented into the various components of the dose calculation algorithm including primary photons, secondary photons, electron contamination, and MLC parameters. For each error we evaluated the probability that it could be committed unknowingly during the dose algorithm commissioning stage, and the probability of it being identified during the verification stage. The clinical impact of each commissioning error was evaluated using representative IMRT plans including low and intermediate risk prostate, head and neck, mesothelioma, and scalp; the sensitivity of the TG‐119 and IROC phantoms was evaluated by comparing dosimetric changes to the dose planes where film measurements occur and change in point doses where dosimeter measurements occur. No commissioning errors were found to have both a low probability of detection and high clinical severity. When errors do occur, the IROC credentialing and TG 119 commissioning criteria are generally effective at detecting them; however, for the IROC phantom, OAR point‐dose measurements are the most sensitive despite being currently excluded from IROC analysis. Point‐dose measurements with an absolute dose constraint were the most effective at detecting errors, while film analysis using a gamma comparison and the IROC film distance to agreement criteria were less effective at detecting the specific commissioning errors implemented here. PACS number: 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690193/ /pubmed/26894330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5452 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
McVicker, Drew
Yin, Fang‐Fang
Adamson, Justus D.
On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors
title On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors
title_full On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors
title_fullStr On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors
title_full_unstemmed On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors
title_short On the sensitivity of TG‐119 and IROC credentialing to TPS commissioning errors
title_sort on the sensitivity of tg‐119 and iroc credentialing to tps commissioning errors
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5452
work_keys_str_mv AT mcvickerdrew onthesensitivityoftg119andiroccredentialingtotpscommissioningerrors
AT yinfangfang onthesensitivityoftg119andiroccredentialingtotpscommissioningerrors
AT adamsonjustusd onthesensitivityoftg119andiroccredentialingtotpscommissioningerrors