Cargando…

Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy

The feasibility of using portal dosimetry (PD) to verify 6 MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) IMRT treatments was investigated. An Elekta Synergy linear accelerator with an Agility collimator capable of delivering FFF beams and a standard iViewGT amorphous silicon (aSi) EPID panel (RID 1640 AL5P) at a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chuter, Robert W., Rixham, Philip A., Weston, Steve J., Cosgrove, Vivian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5686
_version_ 1783279553669496832
author Chuter, Robert W.
Rixham, Philip A.
Weston, Steve J.
Cosgrove, Vivian P.
author_facet Chuter, Robert W.
Rixham, Philip A.
Weston, Steve J.
Cosgrove, Vivian P.
author_sort Chuter, Robert W.
collection PubMed
description The feasibility of using portal dosimetry (PD) to verify 6 MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) IMRT treatments was investigated. An Elekta Synergy linear accelerator with an Agility collimator capable of delivering FFF beams and a standard iViewGT amorphous silicon (aSi) EPID panel (RID 1640 AL5P) at a fixed SSD of 160 cm were used. Dose rates for FFF beams are up to four times higher than for conventional flattened beams, meaning images taken at maximum FFF dose rate can saturate the EPID. A dose rate of 800 MU/min was found not to saturate the EPID for open fields. This dose rate was subsequently used to characterize the EPID for FFF portal dosimetry. A range of open and phantom fields were measured with both an ion chamber and the EPID, to allow comparison between the two. The measured data were then used to create a model within The Nederlands Kanker Instituut's (NKI's) portal dosimetry software. The model was verified using simple square fields with a range of field sizes and phantom thicknesses. These were compared to calculations performed with the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS) and isocentric ion chamber measurements. It was found that the results for the FFF verification were similar to those for flattened beams with testing on square fields, indicating a difference in dose between the TPS and portal dosimetry of approximately 1%. Two FFF IMRT plans (prostate and lung SABR) were delivered to a homogeneous phantom and showed an overall dose difference at isocenter of [Formula: see text] and good agreement between the TPS and PD dose distributions. The feasibility of using the NKI software without any modifications for high‐dose‐rate FFF beams and using a standard EPID detector has been investigated and some initial limitations highlighted. PACS number: 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56901982018-04-02 Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy Chuter, Robert W. Rixham, Philip A. Weston, Steve J. Cosgrove, Vivian P. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The feasibility of using portal dosimetry (PD) to verify 6 MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) IMRT treatments was investigated. An Elekta Synergy linear accelerator with an Agility collimator capable of delivering FFF beams and a standard iViewGT amorphous silicon (aSi) EPID panel (RID 1640 AL5P) at a fixed SSD of 160 cm were used. Dose rates for FFF beams are up to four times higher than for conventional flattened beams, meaning images taken at maximum FFF dose rate can saturate the EPID. A dose rate of 800 MU/min was found not to saturate the EPID for open fields. This dose rate was subsequently used to characterize the EPID for FFF portal dosimetry. A range of open and phantom fields were measured with both an ion chamber and the EPID, to allow comparison between the two. The measured data were then used to create a model within The Nederlands Kanker Instituut's (NKI's) portal dosimetry software. The model was verified using simple square fields with a range of field sizes and phantom thicknesses. These were compared to calculations performed with the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS) and isocentric ion chamber measurements. It was found that the results for the FFF verification were similar to those for flattened beams with testing on square fields, indicating a difference in dose between the TPS and portal dosimetry of approximately 1%. Two FFF IMRT plans (prostate and lung SABR) were delivered to a homogeneous phantom and showed an overall dose difference at isocenter of [Formula: see text] and good agreement between the TPS and PD dose distributions. The feasibility of using the NKI software without any modifications for high‐dose‐rate FFF beams and using a standard EPID detector has been investigated and some initial limitations highlighted. PACS number: 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690198/ /pubmed/26894337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5686 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Chuter, Robert W.
Rixham, Philip A.
Weston, Steve J.
Cosgrove, Vivian P.
Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
title Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
title_full Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
title_fullStr Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
title_short Feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
title_sort feasibility of portal dosimetry for flattening filter‐free radiotherapy
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5686
work_keys_str_mv AT chuterrobertw feasibilityofportaldosimetryforflatteningfilterfreeradiotherapy
AT rixhamphilipa feasibilityofportaldosimetryforflatteningfilterfreeradiotherapy
AT westonstevej feasibilityofportaldosimetryforflatteningfilterfreeradiotherapy
AT cosgrovevivianp feasibilityofportaldosimetryforflatteningfilterfreeradiotherapy