Cargando…

Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the dose on megavoltage CT (MVCT) images required for tomotherapy. As imaging possibilities are often used before each treatment and usually used several times before the session, we tried to evaluate the dose delivered during the procedure. For each...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mege, Jean‐Pierre, Wenzhao, Sun, Veres, Attila, Auzac, Guillaume, Diallo, Ibrahima, Lefkopoulos, Dimitri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5774
_version_ 1783279555397550080
author Mege, Jean‐Pierre
Wenzhao, Sun
Veres, Attila
Auzac, Guillaume
Diallo, Ibrahima
Lefkopoulos, Dimitri
author_facet Mege, Jean‐Pierre
Wenzhao, Sun
Veres, Attila
Auzac, Guillaume
Diallo, Ibrahima
Lefkopoulos, Dimitri
author_sort Mege, Jean‐Pierre
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the dose on megavoltage CT (MVCT) images required for tomotherapy. As imaging possibilities are often used before each treatment and usually used several times before the session, we tried to evaluate the dose delivered during the procedure. For each scanning mode (fine, normal, and coarse), we first established the relative variation of these doses according to different technical parameters (explored length, patient setup). These dose variations measured with the TomoPhant, also known as Cheese phantom, showed the expected variations (due to the variation of scattered radiation) of 15% according to the explored length and [Formula: see text] according to the phantom setup (due to the variation of the point of measurement in the bore). In order to estimate patient doses, an anthropomorphic phantom was used for thermoluminescent and film dosimetry. The degree of agreement between the two methods was very satisfactory (the differences correspond to 5 mGy per imaging session) for the three sites studied (head & neck, thorax, and abdomen). These measurements allowed us to estimate the delivered dose of between 1 cGy and 4 cGy according to the site and imaging mode. Finally, we attempted to investigate a way to calculate this delivered dose in our patients from the study conducted on a cylindrical phantom and by taking into account data from the initial kV‐CT scan. The results we obtained were close to our measurements, with discrepancies below 5 mGy per MVCT. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56902062018-04-02 Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films Mege, Jean‐Pierre Wenzhao, Sun Veres, Attila Auzac, Guillaume Diallo, Ibrahima Lefkopoulos, Dimitri J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the dose on megavoltage CT (MVCT) images required for tomotherapy. As imaging possibilities are often used before each treatment and usually used several times before the session, we tried to evaluate the dose delivered during the procedure. For each scanning mode (fine, normal, and coarse), we first established the relative variation of these doses according to different technical parameters (explored length, patient setup). These dose variations measured with the TomoPhant, also known as Cheese phantom, showed the expected variations (due to the variation of scattered radiation) of 15% according to the explored length and [Formula: see text] according to the phantom setup (due to the variation of the point of measurement in the bore). In order to estimate patient doses, an anthropomorphic phantom was used for thermoluminescent and film dosimetry. The degree of agreement between the two methods was very satisfactory (the differences correspond to 5 mGy per imaging session) for the three sites studied (head & neck, thorax, and abdomen). These measurements allowed us to estimate the delivered dose of between 1 cGy and 4 cGy according to the site and imaging mode. Finally, we attempted to investigate a way to calculate this delivered dose in our patients from the study conducted on a cylindrical phantom and by taking into account data from the initial kV‐CT scan. The results we obtained were close to our measurements, with discrepancies below 5 mGy per MVCT. PACS numbers: 87.53.Bn, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690206/ /pubmed/26894346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5774 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Mege, Jean‐Pierre
Wenzhao, Sun
Veres, Attila
Auzac, Guillaume
Diallo, Ibrahima
Lefkopoulos, Dimitri
Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films
title Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films
title_full Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films
title_fullStr Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films
title_short Evaluation of MVCT imaging dose levels during helical IGRT: comparison between ion chamber, TLD, and EBT3 films
title_sort evaluation of mvct imaging dose levels during helical igrt: comparison between ion chamber, tld, and ebt3 films
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5774
work_keys_str_mv AT megejeanpierre evaluationofmvctimagingdoselevelsduringhelicaligrtcomparisonbetweenionchambertldandebt3films
AT wenzhaosun evaluationofmvctimagingdoselevelsduringhelicaligrtcomparisonbetweenionchambertldandebt3films
AT veresattila evaluationofmvctimagingdoselevelsduringhelicaligrtcomparisonbetweenionchambertldandebt3films
AT auzacguillaume evaluationofmvctimagingdoselevelsduringhelicaligrtcomparisonbetweenionchambertldandebt3films
AT dialloibrahima evaluationofmvctimagingdoselevelsduringhelicaligrtcomparisonbetweenionchambertldandebt3films
AT lefkopoulosdimitri evaluationofmvctimagingdoselevelsduringhelicaligrtcomparisonbetweenionchambertldandebt3films