Cargando…
Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape
OBJECTIVE: The global fight against HIV/AIDS in Africa has long been a focus of US foreign policy, but this could change if the federal budget for 2018 proposed by the US Office of Management and Budget is adopted. We aim to inform public and Congressional debate around this issue by evaluating the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29112075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001669 |
_version_ | 1783279578856292352 |
---|---|
author | McGillen, Jessica B. Sharp, Alana Honermann, Brian Millett, Gregorio Collins, Chris Hallett, Timothy B. |
author_facet | McGillen, Jessica B. Sharp, Alana Honermann, Brian Millett, Gregorio Collins, Chris Hallett, Timothy B. |
author_sort | McGillen, Jessica B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The global fight against HIV/AIDS in Africa has long been a focus of US foreign policy, but this could change if the federal budget for 2018 proposed by the US Office of Management and Budget is adopted. We aim to inform public and Congressional debate around this issue by evaluating the historical and potential future impact of US investment in the African HIV response. DESIGN/METHODS: We use a previously published mathematical model of HIV transmission to characterize the possible impact of a series of financial scenarios for the historical and future AIDS response across Sub-Saharan Africa. RESULTS: We find that US funding has saved nearly five million adults in Sub-Saharan Africa from AIDS-related deaths. In the coming 15 years, if current numbers on antiretroviral treatment are maintained without further expansion of programs (the proposed US strategy), nearly 26 million new HIV infections and 4.4 million AIDS deaths may occur. A 10% increase in US funding, together with ambitious domestic spending and focused attention on optimizing resources, can avert up to 22 million HIV infections and save 2.3 million lives in Sub-Saharan Africa compared with the proposed strategy. CONCLUSION: Our synthesis of available evidence shows that the United States has played, and could continue to play, a vital role in the global HIV response. Reduced investment could allow more than two million avoidable AIDS deaths by 2032, whereas continued leadership by the United States and other countries could bring UNAIDS targets for ending the epidemic into reach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56903042017-11-29 Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape McGillen, Jessica B. Sharp, Alana Honermann, Brian Millett, Gregorio Collins, Chris Hallett, Timothy B. AIDS Fast Track OBJECTIVE: The global fight against HIV/AIDS in Africa has long been a focus of US foreign policy, but this could change if the federal budget for 2018 proposed by the US Office of Management and Budget is adopted. We aim to inform public and Congressional debate around this issue by evaluating the historical and potential future impact of US investment in the African HIV response. DESIGN/METHODS: We use a previously published mathematical model of HIV transmission to characterize the possible impact of a series of financial scenarios for the historical and future AIDS response across Sub-Saharan Africa. RESULTS: We find that US funding has saved nearly five million adults in Sub-Saharan Africa from AIDS-related deaths. In the coming 15 years, if current numbers on antiretroviral treatment are maintained without further expansion of programs (the proposed US strategy), nearly 26 million new HIV infections and 4.4 million AIDS deaths may occur. A 10% increase in US funding, together with ambitious domestic spending and focused attention on optimizing resources, can avert up to 22 million HIV infections and save 2.3 million lives in Sub-Saharan Africa compared with the proposed strategy. CONCLUSION: Our synthesis of available evidence shows that the United States has played, and could continue to play, a vital role in the global HIV response. Reduced investment could allow more than two million avoidable AIDS deaths by 2032, whereas continued leadership by the United States and other countries could bring UNAIDS targets for ending the epidemic into reach. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-11-28 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5690304/ /pubmed/29112075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001669 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. |
spellingShingle | Fast Track McGillen, Jessica B. Sharp, Alana Honermann, Brian Millett, Gregorio Collins, Chris Hallett, Timothy B. Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape |
title | Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape |
title_full | Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape |
title_fullStr | Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape |
title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape |
title_short | Consequences of a changing US strategy in the global HIV investment landscape |
title_sort | consequences of a changing us strategy in the global hiv investment landscape |
topic | Fast Track |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29112075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001669 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgillenjessicab consequencesofachangingusstrategyintheglobalhivinvestmentlandscape AT sharpalana consequencesofachangingusstrategyintheglobalhivinvestmentlandscape AT honermannbrian consequencesofachangingusstrategyintheglobalhivinvestmentlandscape AT millettgregorio consequencesofachangingusstrategyintheglobalhivinvestmentlandscape AT collinschris consequencesofachangingusstrategyintheglobalhivinvestmentlandscape AT halletttimothyb consequencesofachangingusstrategyintheglobalhivinvestmentlandscape |