Cargando…

Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?

Tobacco product displays are a pervasive presence in convenience stores, supermarkets, pharmacies, and other retailers nationwide. The influence that tobacco product displays have on purchases and tobacco product initiation, particularly on young people and other vulnerable populations, is well know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Combs, Todd B., Moreland-Russell, Sarah, Roche, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIMS Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29188220
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.810
_version_ 1783279610242269184
author Combs, Todd B.
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Roche, Jason
author_facet Combs, Todd B.
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Roche, Jason
author_sort Combs, Todd B.
collection PubMed
description Tobacco product displays are a pervasive presence in convenience stores, supermarkets, pharmacies, and other retailers nationwide. The influence that tobacco product displays have on purchases and tobacco product initiation, particularly on young people and other vulnerable populations, is well known. An objective measurement tool that is valid, reliable, and feasible to use is needed to assess product displays in the retail setting. This study reports on the relative accuracy of various tools that measure area and/or distance in photos and thus could be applied to product displays. We compare results of repeated trials using five tools. Three tools are smartphone apps that measure objects in photos taken on the device; these are narrowed down from a list of 284 candidate apps. Another tool uses photos taken with any device and calculates relative area via a built-in function in the Microsoft Office Suite. The fifth uses photos taken with the Narrative Clip, a “life-logging” wearable camera. To evaluate validity and reliability, we assess each instrument's measurements and calculate intra-class correlation coefficients. Mean differences between observed measurements (via tape measure) and those from the five tools range from just over one square foot to just over two square feet. Most instruments produce reliable estimates though some are sensitive to the size of the display. Results of this study indicate need for future research to test innovative measurement tools. This paper also solicits further discussion on how best to transform anecdotal knowledge of product displays as targeted and disproportionate marketing tactics into a scientific evidence base for public policy change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AIMS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56904452017-11-27 Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that? Combs, Todd B. Moreland-Russell, Sarah Roche, Jason AIMS Public Health Commentary Tobacco product displays are a pervasive presence in convenience stores, supermarkets, pharmacies, and other retailers nationwide. The influence that tobacco product displays have on purchases and tobacco product initiation, particularly on young people and other vulnerable populations, is well known. An objective measurement tool that is valid, reliable, and feasible to use is needed to assess product displays in the retail setting. This study reports on the relative accuracy of various tools that measure area and/or distance in photos and thus could be applied to product displays. We compare results of repeated trials using five tools. Three tools are smartphone apps that measure objects in photos taken on the device; these are narrowed down from a list of 284 candidate apps. Another tool uses photos taken with any device and calculates relative area via a built-in function in the Microsoft Office Suite. The fifth uses photos taken with the Narrative Clip, a “life-logging” wearable camera. To evaluate validity and reliability, we assess each instrument's measurements and calculate intra-class correlation coefficients. Mean differences between observed measurements (via tape measure) and those from the five tools range from just over one square foot to just over two square feet. Most instruments produce reliable estimates though some are sensitive to the size of the display. Results of this study indicate need for future research to test innovative measurement tools. This paper also solicits further discussion on how best to transform anecdotal knowledge of product displays as targeted and disproportionate marketing tactics into a scientific evidence base for public policy change. AIMS Press 2015-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5690445/ /pubmed/29188220 http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.810 Text en © 2015 Todd B. Combs, licensee AIMS Press This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
spellingShingle Commentary
Combs, Todd B.
Moreland-Russell, Sarah
Roche, Jason
Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?
title Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?
title_full Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?
title_fullStr Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?
title_short Evaluation of Measurement Tools for Tobacco Product Displays: Is there an App for that?
title_sort evaluation of measurement tools for tobacco product displays: is there an app for that?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29188220
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.810
work_keys_str_mv AT combstoddb evaluationofmeasurementtoolsfortobaccoproductdisplaysisthereanappforthat
AT morelandrussellsarah evaluationofmeasurementtoolsfortobaccoproductdisplaysisthereanappforthat
AT rochejason evaluationofmeasurementtoolsfortobaccoproductdisplaysisthereanappforthat