Cargando…

Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context

A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Michelle K., Malkoske, Kyle E., Brown, Erika, Diamond, Kevin, Frenière, Normand, Grant, John, Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie, Schella, Jason, Schreiner, L. John, Tantôt, Laurent, Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo, Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27929477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422
_version_ 1783279623485784064
author Nielsen, Michelle K.
Malkoske, Kyle E.
Brown, Erika
Diamond, Kevin
Frenière, Normand
Grant, John
Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie
Schella, Jason
Schreiner, L. John
Tantôt, Laurent
Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo
Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre
author_facet Nielsen, Michelle K.
Malkoske, Kyle E.
Brown, Erika
Diamond, Kevin
Frenière, Normand
Grant, John
Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie
Schella, Jason
Schreiner, L. John
Tantôt, Laurent
Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo
Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre
author_sort Nielsen, Michelle K.
collection PubMed
description A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment; they outline specific performance objectives and criteria that equipment should meet in order to assure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The adopted framework for the development and maintenance of the TQCs ensures the guidelines incorporate input from the medical physics community during development, measures the workload required to perform the QC tests outlined in each TQC, and remain relevant (i.e., “living documents”) through subsequent planned reviews and updates. The framework includes consolidation of existing guidelines and/or literature by expert reviewers, structured stages of public review, external field‐testing, and ratification by COMP. This TQC development framework is a cross‐country initiative that allows for rapid development of robust, community‐driven living guideline documents that are owned by the community and reviewed to keep relevant in a rapidly evolving technical environment. Community engagement and uptake survey data shows 70% of Canadian centers are part of this process and that the data in the guideline documents reflect, and are influencing, the way Canadian radiation treatment centers run their technical quality control programs. For a medium‐sized center comprising six linear accelerators and a comprehensive brachytherapy program, we evaluate the physics workload to 1.5 full‐time equivalent physicists per year to complete all QC tests listed in this suite. PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.56.‐v
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5690511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56905112018-04-02 Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context Nielsen, Michelle K. Malkoske, Kyle E. Brown, Erika Diamond, Kevin Frenière, Normand Grant, John Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie Schella, Jason Schreiner, L. John Tantôt, Laurent Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre J Appl Clin Med Phys COMP Reports and Documents A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment; they outline specific performance objectives and criteria that equipment should meet in order to assure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The adopted framework for the development and maintenance of the TQCs ensures the guidelines incorporate input from the medical physics community during development, measures the workload required to perform the QC tests outlined in each TQC, and remain relevant (i.e., “living documents”) through subsequent planned reviews and updates. The framework includes consolidation of existing guidelines and/or literature by expert reviewers, structured stages of public review, external field‐testing, and ratification by COMP. This TQC development framework is a cross‐country initiative that allows for rapid development of robust, community‐driven living guideline documents that are owned by the community and reviewed to keep relevant in a rapidly evolving technical environment. Community engagement and uptake survey data shows 70% of Canadian centers are part of this process and that the data in the guideline documents reflect, and are influencing, the way Canadian radiation treatment centers run their technical quality control programs. For a medium‐sized center comprising six linear accelerators and a comprehensive brachytherapy program, we evaluate the physics workload to 1.5 full‐time equivalent physicists per year to complete all QC tests listed in this suite. PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.56.‐v John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690511/ /pubmed/27929477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle COMP Reports and Documents
Nielsen, Michelle K.
Malkoske, Kyle E.
Brown, Erika
Diamond, Kevin
Frenière, Normand
Grant, John
Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie
Schella, Jason
Schreiner, L. John
Tantôt, Laurent
Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo
Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre
Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
title Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
title_full Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
title_fullStr Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
title_full_unstemmed Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
title_short Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
title_sort production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
topic COMP Reports and Documents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27929477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenmichellek productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT malkoskekylee productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT brownerika productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT diamondkevin productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT frenierenormand productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT grantjohn productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT pomerleaudalcourtnatalie productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT schellajason productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT schreinerljohn productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT tantotlaurent productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT villarrealbarajasjeduardo productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext
AT bissonnettejeanpierre productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext