Cargando…
Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context
A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27929477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422 |
_version_ | 1783279623485784064 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Michelle K. Malkoske, Kyle E. Brown, Erika Diamond, Kevin Frenière, Normand Grant, John Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie Schella, Jason Schreiner, L. John Tantôt, Laurent Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre |
author_facet | Nielsen, Michelle K. Malkoske, Kyle E. Brown, Erika Diamond, Kevin Frenière, Normand Grant, John Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie Schella, Jason Schreiner, L. John Tantôt, Laurent Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre |
author_sort | Nielsen, Michelle K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment; they outline specific performance objectives and criteria that equipment should meet in order to assure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The adopted framework for the development and maintenance of the TQCs ensures the guidelines incorporate input from the medical physics community during development, measures the workload required to perform the QC tests outlined in each TQC, and remain relevant (i.e., “living documents”) through subsequent planned reviews and updates. The framework includes consolidation of existing guidelines and/or literature by expert reviewers, structured stages of public review, external field‐testing, and ratification by COMP. This TQC development framework is a cross‐country initiative that allows for rapid development of robust, community‐driven living guideline documents that are owned by the community and reviewed to keep relevant in a rapidly evolving technical environment. Community engagement and uptake survey data shows 70% of Canadian centers are part of this process and that the data in the guideline documents reflect, and are influencing, the way Canadian radiation treatment centers run their technical quality control programs. For a medium‐sized center comprising six linear accelerators and a comprehensive brachytherapy program, we evaluate the physics workload to 1.5 full‐time equivalent physicists per year to complete all QC tests listed in this suite. PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.56.‐v |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56905112018-04-02 Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context Nielsen, Michelle K. Malkoske, Kyle E. Brown, Erika Diamond, Kevin Frenière, Normand Grant, John Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie Schella, Jason Schreiner, L. John Tantôt, Laurent Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre J Appl Clin Med Phys COMP Reports and Documents A close partnership between the Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR) and the Canadian Organization of Medical Physicist's (COMP) Quality Assurance and Radiation Safety Advisory Committee (QARSAC) has resulted in the development of a suite of Technical Quality Control (TQC) guidelines for radiation treatment equipment; they outline specific performance objectives and criteria that equipment should meet in order to assure an acceptable level of radiation treatment quality. The adopted framework for the development and maintenance of the TQCs ensures the guidelines incorporate input from the medical physics community during development, measures the workload required to perform the QC tests outlined in each TQC, and remain relevant (i.e., “living documents”) through subsequent planned reviews and updates. The framework includes consolidation of existing guidelines and/or literature by expert reviewers, structured stages of public review, external field‐testing, and ratification by COMP. This TQC development framework is a cross‐country initiative that allows for rapid development of robust, community‐driven living guideline documents that are owned by the community and reviewed to keep relevant in a rapidly evolving technical environment. Community engagement and uptake survey data shows 70% of Canadian centers are part of this process and that the data in the guideline documents reflect, and are influencing, the way Canadian radiation treatment centers run their technical quality control programs. For a medium‐sized center comprising six linear accelerators and a comprehensive brachytherapy program, we evaluate the physics workload to 1.5 full‐time equivalent physicists per year to complete all QC tests listed in this suite. PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc, 87.56.‐v John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5690511/ /pubmed/27929477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422 Text en © 2016 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | COMP Reports and Documents Nielsen, Michelle K. Malkoske, Kyle E. Brown, Erika Diamond, Kevin Frenière, Normand Grant, John Pomerleau‐Dalcourt, Natalie Schella, Jason Schreiner, L. John Tantôt, Laurent Villarreal‐Barajas, J. Eduardo Bissonnette, Jean‐Pierre Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
title | Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
title_full | Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
title_fullStr | Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
title_full_unstemmed | Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
title_short | Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
title_sort | production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context |
topic | COMP Reports and Documents |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27929477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielsenmichellek productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT malkoskekylee productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT brownerika productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT diamondkevin productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT frenierenormand productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT grantjohn productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT pomerleaudalcourtnatalie productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT schellajason productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT schreinerljohn productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT tantotlaurent productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT villarrealbarajasjeduardo productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext AT bissonnettejeanpierre productionreviewandimpactoftechnicalqualitycontrolguidelinesinanationalcontext |