Cargando…
Radiographic prediction of meningioma grade by semantic and radiomic features
OBJECTIVES: The clinical management of meningioma is guided by tumor grade and biological behavior. Currently, the assessment of tumor grade follows surgical resection and histopathologic review. Reliable techniques for pre-operative determination of tumor grade may enhance clinical decision-making....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187908 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: The clinical management of meningioma is guided by tumor grade and biological behavior. Currently, the assessment of tumor grade follows surgical resection and histopathologic review. Reliable techniques for pre-operative determination of tumor grade may enhance clinical decision-making. METHODS: A total of 175 meningioma patients (103 low-grade and 72 high-grade) with pre-operative contrast-enhanced T1-MRI were included. Fifteen radiomic (quantitative) and 10 semantic (qualitative) features were applied to quantify the imaging phenotype. Area under the curve (AUC) and odd ratios (OR) were computed with multiple-hypothesis correction. Random-forest classifiers were developed and validated on an independent dataset (n = 44). RESULTS: Twelve radiographic features (eight radiomic and four semantic) were significantly associated with meningioma grade. High-grade tumors exhibited necrosis/hemorrhage (OR(sem) = 6.6, AUC(rad) = 0.62–0.68), intratumoral heterogeneity (OR(sem) = 7.9, AUC(rad) = 0.65), non-spherical shape (AUC(rad) = 0.61), and larger volumes (AUC(rad) = 0.69) compared to low-grade tumors. Radiomic and sematic classifiers could significantly predict meningioma grade (AUC(sem) = 0.76 and AUC(rad) = 0.78). Furthermore, combining them increased the classification power (AUC(radio) = 0.86). Clinical variables alone did not effectively predict tumor grade (AUC(clin) = 0.65) or show complementary value with imaging data (AUC(comb) = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: We found a strong association between imaging features of meningioma and histopathologic grade, with ready application to clinical management. Combining qualitative and quantitative radiographic features significantly improved classification power. |
---|