Cargando…
Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators
In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188016 |
_version_ | 1783279652724277248 |
---|---|
author | Erdoğan, Cihat Kurt, Zeyneb Diri, Banu |
author_facet | Erdoğan, Cihat Kurt, Zeyneb Diri, Banu |
author_sort | Erdoğan, Cihat |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the hub genes/proteins within the disease-associated gene-gene/protein-protein interaction sub networks were identified. Proteomic data from various cancer types is collected from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA). Correlation and mutual information (MI) based nine association estimators that are commonly used in the literature, were compared in this study. As the gold standard to measure the association estimators’ performance, a multi-layer data integration platform on gene-disease associations (DisGeNET) and the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) was used. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the performance of the association estimators by comparing the created co-expression networks with the disease-associated pathways. It was observed that the MI based estimators provided more successful results than the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, which are used in the estimation of biological networks in the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) package. In correlation-based methods, the best average success rate for five cancer types was 60%, while in MI-based methods the average success ratio was 71% for James-Stein Shrinkage (Shrink) and 64% for Schurmann-Grassberger (SG) association estimator, respectively. Moreover, the hub genes and the inferred sub networks are presented for the consideration of researchers and experimentalists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5690670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56906702017-11-30 Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators Erdoğan, Cihat Kurt, Zeyneb Diri, Banu PLoS One Research Article In this study, the association estimators, which have significant influences on the gene network inference methods and used for determining the molecular interactions, were examined within the co-expression network inference concept. By using the proteomic data from five different cancer types, the hub genes/proteins within the disease-associated gene-gene/protein-protein interaction sub networks were identified. Proteomic data from various cancer types is collected from The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA). Correlation and mutual information (MI) based nine association estimators that are commonly used in the literature, were compared in this study. As the gold standard to measure the association estimators’ performance, a multi-layer data integration platform on gene-disease associations (DisGeNET) and the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) was used. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the performance of the association estimators by comparing the created co-expression networks with the disease-associated pathways. It was observed that the MI based estimators provided more successful results than the Pearson and Spearman correlation approaches, which are used in the estimation of biological networks in the weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) package. In correlation-based methods, the best average success rate for five cancer types was 60%, while in MI-based methods the average success ratio was 71% for James-Stein Shrinkage (Shrink) and 64% for Schurmann-Grassberger (SG) association estimator, respectively. Moreover, the hub genes and the inferred sub networks are presented for the consideration of researchers and experimentalists. Public Library of Science 2017-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5690670/ /pubmed/29145449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188016 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Erdoğan, Cihat Kurt, Zeyneb Diri, Banu Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
title | Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
title_full | Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
title_fullStr | Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
title_short | Estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
title_sort | estimation of the proteomic cancer co-expression sub networks by using association estimators |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5690670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29145449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erdogancihat estimationoftheproteomiccancercoexpressionsubnetworksbyusingassociationestimators AT kurtzeyneb estimationoftheproteomiccancercoexpressionsubnetworksbyusingassociationestimators AT diribanu estimationoftheproteomiccancercoexpressionsubnetworksbyusingassociationestimators |